と重なる：overlap, overlap with

Translate: 排気管の、開口と重なる部分

ChatGPT:

ChatGPT

"Portion of the exhaust pipe that overlaps with the opening"

あなた:

How about

1. Portion of the exhaust pipe that overlaps the opening

2. Portion of the exhaust pipe overlapping with the opening

3. Portion of the exhaust pipe overlapping the opening

ChatGPT:

ChatGPT

Each of these options conveys the meaning effectively, with slight differences in style and emphasis:

1. "Portion of the exhaust pipe that overlaps the opening"
   This option is clear and direct, using "that overlaps" to specify the relationship. It’s slightly more formal, which can be beneficial in precise technical contexts.

2. "Portion of the exhaust pipe overlapping with the opening"
   Using "overlapping with" keeps it natural and slightly less formal. It’s concise and works well if you prefer a smoother flow.

3. "Portion of the exhaust pipe overlapping the opening"
   This is the most streamlined and direct option, omitting "with" for maximum brevity. It’s very efficient and reads naturally in technical descriptions.

Recommendation

Option 3 ("Portion of the exhaust pipe overlapping the opening") is likely the best choice if conciseness and readability are priorities, as it communicates the relationship clearly and efficiently.

あなた:

Are "overlap" and "overlap with" almost identical in meaning?

ChatGPT:

ChatGPT

Yes, "overlap" and "overlap with" are nearly identical in meaning, but there is a subtle difference:

• "Overlap" alone can imply a more direct or inherent connection, suggesting that one object covers or extends over part of another.

• "Overlap with" slightly emphasizes the interaction between two separate entities, highlighting that one item interacts or aligns with another in space.

In most contexts, especially technical writing, these differences are minimal, and the two are often interchangeable. However, "overlap with" can sometimes provide additional clarity when emphasizing the relationship between two distinct parts.