和英特許翻訳メモ

便利そうな表現、疑問、謎、その他メモ書き。思いつきで書いてます。
拾った用例は必ずしも典型例、模範例ではありません。

語順

2024-08-14 10:20:47 | ChatGPT
Me: In technical writing, such as for the purpose of filing patent applications and writing manuals, which of the following do you think is better from the viewpoints of usage, grammar, readability, and so on?
 
1) The substrate has formed thereon a number of transistors.
2) A number of transistors are formed on the substrate.
Option 2, "A number of transistors are formed on the substrate," is generally better for technical writing, especially when considering usage, grammar, and readability. Here's why:
  1. Clarity and Readability: Option 2 is more straightforward and easier to understand. It follows the typical subject-verb-object (SVO) sentence structure, which is familiar to most readers and therefore easier to process.

  2. Grammar: Option 2 uses the active voice, which is often preferred in technical writing because it makes the sentence clearer and more direct. Option 1 uses a somewhat passive construction ("has formed thereon"), which can be more difficult to follow.

  3. Usage: Technical writing should be as clear and precise as possible. Option 2 clearly states what is formed (transistors) and where they are formed (on the substrate) without any unnecessary complexity.

  4. Conciseness: Option 2 is more concise, avoiding the somewhat archaic or overly formal construction found in Option 1.

Overall, Option 2 is likely to be more effective in technical writing contexts.

Me: Are there situations or contexts in which Option 1 is better? For instance, consider the following passage: This device includes a power supply and a substrate. In this case, when the writer wants to add the information that a number of transistors are formed on the substrate, wouldn't it sound better or be more appropriate if he or she started the next sentence by saying, "The substrate has formed thereon a number of transistors" or "The substrate has a number of transistors formed thereon", because he or she has just mentioned "a substrate" and so it is more natural to start the next sentence using the "substrate" as the subject, isn't it?
ChatGPT said:
You're correct that there can be contexts where Option 1, or a slight variation of it, might be more appropriate or effective, particularly in maintaining continuity and emphasis in a passage. Here’s why this might be the case:
  1. Continuity and Flow: When a paragraph introduces an element like "the substrate," it can be more natural and fluid to continue discussing this element as the subject of subsequent sentences. This helps maintain the focus on the substrate and creates a smoother narrative flow.

  2. Emphasis on the Substrate: If the writer wants to emphasize the substrate and what is on it, starting the sentence with "The substrate" keeps the focus on that element. In technical writing, where specific elements need to be highlighted, this structure can be useful.

  3. Contextual Relevance: In a context where the substrate is the primary focus, and the transistors are additional details, saying, "The substrate has a number of transistors formed thereon," emphasizes the substrate first, making the sentence feel more connected to the preceding one.

In the passage you provided:

Example Context: "This device includes a power supply and a substrate. The substrate has a number of transistors formed thereon."

This version maintains continuity by keeping "the substrate" as the subject, which might feel more cohesive and natural in the flow of the paragraph. However, a more modern and clearer version that still maintains this continuity might be:

Alternative Suggestion: "This device includes a power supply and a substrate. The substrate has a number of transistors formed on it."

This variation is a good compromise, maintaining readability and clarity while keeping the substrate as the subject.

In summary, while Option 2 is generally better for clarity and simplicity, Option 1 or a variation might be preferable in contexts where maintaining the subject's focus or ensuring smooth narrative flow is important.

Me:

Thanks! I'm counting on you!
ChatGPT said:
You're very welcome! I'm glad I could help. If you have any more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask. I'm here whenever you need me! 😊
コメント    この記事についてブログを書く
  • X
  • Facebookでシェアする
  • はてなブックマークに追加する
  • LINEでシェアする
« 容量蓄積 | トップ | 開閉自在に »
最新の画像もっと見る

コメントを投稿

ChatGPT」カテゴリの最新記事