Which is more preferable or conventional?
1. This device includes a lens A, a lens B, and a lens C in order from the object side.
2. This device includes, in order from the object side, a lens A, a lens B, and a lens C.
ChatGPT:
ChatGPT
Both sentences are grammatically correct, but the second sentence is generally more preferable and conventional in technical writing, especially in fields like patent applications or scientific descriptions. This is because it places the qualifier ("in order from the object side") closer to the beginning, which makes the structure clearer and smoother to read.
Here’s why the second sentence is often preferred:
- Clarity: Placing the qualifier early on prevents it from being buried in the middle of the sentence, making the relationship between the elements more immediately clear.
- Conventional structure: In technical writing, front-loading qualifiers or conditions is common, as it helps to set up expectations before listing the elements being described.
So, option 2 is a more conventional and clearer choice in formal or technical contexts: "This device includes, in order from the object side, a lens A, a lens B, and a lens C."
※コメント投稿者のブログIDはブログ作成者のみに通知されます