10/16/2012. source. Tokyo Shimbun . Jpn's Cabinet Office.
A monitoring post is protected by decontamination.
If a child is not protected most in Fukushima, either, it which is not a pregnant woman, either is a monitoring post.
It is a report to say.
"Decontamination" / Tokyo Shimbun 10/10/2012 mysterious evening paper "spitball"
The value of the air dose rate of Fukushima Iitate-mura announced in a newspaper etc. carried out nose dive from early next year.
Since there was much snow coverage, I thought this year whether it would be the influence.
But, it went into the village by the 1st year of investigation after the accident at the end of March, and he was surprised to check a monitoring post.
As for the surroundings of the place on which the radiation dosimetry machine is placed, it decontaminated thoroughly and topsoil was also replaced.
when the dose rate 1-meter-above ground was measured with the brought measuring instrument, it was 1.2 microsieverts/h (a unit -- the following -- said), but there were 2.4 at the 5-meter-away place.
And a griddle thick steel under a measuring instrument.
Now, the gamma ray from directly under is interrupted considerably.
The official announcement value of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology is actually less than 1microsieverts/h.
Iitate-mura has a shade in degree of contamination also in the village, although the whole region was polluted with the nuclear power plant disaster by high concentration.
In a southern long mud flat division, there is a place where the value still exceeding 10microsieverts/h is measured.
The value of Iitate-mura announced by the thing is a value of the measuring instrument placed on the place where the comparatively low area was moreover decontaminated.
It will not be able to be said at all that the present condition of a village is represented.
Assistant Professor Tetsuji Imanaka of the Kyoto University nuclear reactor experiment place which accompanied was amazed saying "A Monitoring post don't Work."
If the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology is asked, it will be said that it is not involving since Cabinet Office carried out decontamination.
Cabinet Office answered "Cabinet Office did not recognize that the monitoring post was placed."
They say that it did not adjust in advance.
But, why and an answer did not have that (it looks like) which decontaminated the surroundings of the monitoring post carefully.
(An environmental journalist, Shoji Ozawa)
above.
Govt contrived plot I feel.
pathfinderk.
10/16/2012. source. 東京新聞. 内閣府.
除染で守られるのはモニタリングポストです。
'福島で一番守られているのは、子どもでもなければ妊婦でもない、それはモニタリングポストだ。' という記事です。
不可解な『除染』/東京新聞10/10/2012夕刊『紙つぶて』
新聞などで発表される福島県飯舘村の空間線量率の値が、年明けから急低下した。今年は積雪が多かったので、その影響だろうかと考えていた。
だが、３月末に事故後１年目の調査で村に入り、モニタリングポストを確認して驚いた。線量測定器の置かれている場所の周りは徹底的に除染され、表土も入れ替えられていた。持参した測定器で地上１メートルの線量率を測ってみると毎時1.2マイクロシーベルト（単位は以下同）だったが、５メートル離れた場所では2.4あった。しかも測定器の下には分厚い鉄板。これでは直下からのガンマ線はかなり遮られる。実際に、文部科学省の公表値は１を下回っている。
飯舘村は原発事故で全域が高濃度に汚染されたが、村内でも汚染度に濃淡がある。南部の長泥地区では、いまだに10を超える値が計測されるところがある。なのに発表される飯舘村の値は比較的低い地区の、しかも除染された場所に置かれた測定器の値なのだ。村の現況を代表しているとは到底言えまい。同行した京都大原子炉実験所の今中哲二助教は「モニタリングポストの用をなさない」とあきれた。
文科省に問い合わせると、除染は内閣府が実施したため関与していないという。内閣府は「モニタリングポストが置かれていたことを認識していなかった」と答えた。事前に調整しなかったというのだ。だが、ポストの周りを念入りに除染した（ように見える）のはなぜか、答えはなかった。
（環境ジャーナリスト、小沢祥司）
above.
政府の作為を感じますね。 pathfinderk.
