Peace@Syria & Pentagon (PART 2 OF 3)

　
　
Peace@Syria & Pentagon (PART 2 OF 3)


Chretien reflects on Iraq war

<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/waj60i0CD3Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Do you think the current Canadian prime minister reject Obama's proposal?



I doubt.

Why is that?

Stephen Harper (the current prime minister) once wanted Canada to join the war in Iraq.

<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/iPVOhva_cwI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



I don't think that Harper has enough courage and reason to stand up against the United States.



So, Kato, do you think that Obama might have made up a story in order to make an attack?

I think Obama has getting some pressures from the American Establishment.

Why is that?

If you take a close look at the American history, the past presidents have been pressurized to take an awkward action.

... like what?

For example, look at the U2 spy plane incident.


(lib30907c.gif)

■“Actual Catalogue Page”

Spt in the Sky (Trailer)

<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/1WUOkC9_lQw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Kato's Comment


(u2plane.jpg)


(u2pilot.jpg)

On May 1, 1960 U-2 pilot Francis Gary Powers was shot down and captured while trying to photograph a Russian transcontinental missile base.
Four days after Powers disappeared, NASA issued a very detailed press release noting that an aircraft had "gone missing" north of Turkey.
The press release speculated that the pilot might have fallen unconscious while the autopilot was still engaged, even falsely claiming that "the pilot reported over the emergency frequency that he was experiencing oxygen difficulties."
To bolster this, a U-2 plane was quickly painted in NASA colors and shown to the media.
Under the impression that the pilot had died and that the plane had been destroyed, the Americans decided to use the NASA cover up plan.

Nikita Khrushchev used the American mistake to embarrass president Eisenhower and his administration.
After Nikita Khrushchev found out about the cover story that the Americans released, he developed a political trap for Eisenhower.
His plan began with the release of information to the world that a spy plane had been shot down in Soviet territory, but he did not reveal that the pilot of this plane had also been found and that he was alive.

The cover-up story said that the pilot of the U-2 weather plane had radioed in that he was experiencing oxygen difficulties while flying over Turkey.
It also claimed that the plane could have continued on its path because of auto-pilot, and that this could be the plane that crashed in the Soviet Union.

On 7 May, Khrushchev sprang his trap and announced: "I must tell you a secret. When I made my first report I deliberately did not say that the pilot was alive and well... and now just look how many silly things the Americans have said." As the trap began to come together, it became clear that Gary Powers was alive and that he had told his mission to the Soviets. Because of the release of some photographs of the plane, there was evidence that most of the covert U-2 technologies had survived the crash. So Nikita Khrushchev was able to openly embarrass the Eisenhower administration because he had revealed the lie of their attempted cover up.

When he stepped down, he televised his speech, which implies that he was getting pressures from the Military-industrial complex (or American Establishment).

Eisenhower warns us of

the military-industrial complex.

<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/8y06NSBBRtY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>



Do you think that President Eisenhouwer was somewht remorseful at the end of his term?



I suppose so. 　Therefore he said, "We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex."

Do you think that President Obama guards against the acquisition of unwarranted influence by the military–industrial complex?

I doubt. 　He seems acting just like George Bush during the 9/11 crisis.


(lib30907.gif)

■“Actual Catalogue Page”

911 IN PLANE SITE

(Full Movie)

<iframe width="500" height="350" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/tcbGIdeNnTQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Kato's Comment

This is a 2004 72-minute documentary which explains a number of 9/11 conspiracy theories.
Producer and writer Dave Vonkleist says, "The public was not given all of the facts surrounding the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history."
Dave points out the largest coverup in modern U.S. history.
He also asks the audience, "Why was there no Boeing debris outside the Pentagon building immediately after the event?"

Come to think of it, I've never seen any part of the plane debris on the news clips.
Have you?

If you see all the Video & photographic evidences, you might believe that some of the top U.S. brass might have fascilitated the disaster as President Roosevelt didn't prevent the Pearl Harbor attack while knowing the attack was imminent.
Dave implies that some of the U.S. government officials made money, making wars in Afganistan and Iraq.

Several of the claims made in the film, however, have been rejected by some individuals in the 9/11 Truth movement.
The film is quite agitating yet thought-provoking.

I think, Obama might've been getting pressures from the military–industrial complex or the American Establishment.


(question.gif)

【Himiko's Monologue】



Do you think that President Obama is getting pressures from the military–industrial complex or the American Establishment?

During the Eisenhower Administration, an immense military establishment and a large arms industry came into being---quite new in the American experience.
President Eisenhower said that the total influence (economic, political, even spiritual) was felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government.
He recognized the imperative need for this development.
Yet he warned that we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications.

"Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved," said Eisenhower, "So is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex.
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist."

In any case, I hope Kato will write another interesting article soon.
So please come back to see me.

Have a nice day!
Bye bye ...


(hand.gif)

(To be followed)