空

Japanese and Koreans invaded Asia. We apologize.

バカ右翼

2019年09月22日 19時08分43秒 | Weblog



英単語を並べても・・・

2019年09月22日 19時00分48秒 | Weblog
ネタとしてはちょっと古いが、FBでとりあげられていたので・・








challenge the impossibleといいたかったんだろうね。

"海外でしがらみのない人”

2019年09月22日 18時38分51秒 | Weblog
buveryさんがリツイート



JAKE ADELSTEIN should read these articles.

2019年09月22日 14時50分45秒 | Weblog


What is Criminal Negligence?
Criminal negligence is different from civil negligence in that it involves more extreme behavior or actions.

Also, civil negligence cases involve a lesser “burden of proof” compared to criminal negligence cases.


In other words, criminal negligence cases involve higher "budren of proof"

Actual and Proximate Cause
In other words, the plaintiff will have to show that the injuries were the natural and direct consequence of the proximate cause, without which the injuries would not have occurred.



反原発運動」に利用された東京電力刑事裁判
2019年09月21日 06:01
加藤 成一
For a claim in negligence to succeed, it is necessary to establish that
1) the incident was foreseeable based on the concrete evidence.
2) the incident would have been avoided if the appropriate measures had been taken.


判決は３人が接した長期評価について「具体的な根拠がなく、専門家から疑問が示され、自治体の防災計画にも反映されないものだった」と指摘。予見可能性を生じさせる情報だったとはいえず、大きな影響を生じさせてまで運転を止める判断をするには相当の困難があったとした。

判決は、３人が１０メートルを超す津波の情報に接したのは０８年６月～０９年２月ごろで、それから浸水対策や高台への施設移転などの工事を始めても東日本大震災までに完了したか明らかでないと指摘


The long-term evaluation of earthquake occurrence the defendants received was not entirely reliable.

Even if they had started the construction to prevent the accident as suggested, it is not necessarily clear that the incident would have been avoided.

東電裁判 “見えた新事実”
2019年9月20日

(JAKE ADELSTEIN)




わかりやすい政策宣伝動画を

2019年09月22日 14時14分14秒 | Weblog



via FB

議員が支援者と飲んで歌っている様子のお知らせなんて、ソーシャルメディアでみたくないんよ。


こんくらいわかりやすい政策動画を作ってどんどん流してよ。


MUST READ” Anti-Jpn sentiment has always been a political weapon”

2019年09月22日 04時21分52秒 | Weblog
september 2019

The Perils of Populist Nationalism
Gi-Wook Shin


Disputes over historical issues are another candidate. Japan’s colonial rule and its insufficient apologies or compensation for the same are a frequent target of criticism. A careful examination of history, however, reveals that China invaded the Korean Peninsula far more often than Japan. Moreover, the Korean Peninsula may have been unified if China had not intervened in the Korean War. The catastrophic human cost of 3 million casualties could also have been avoided. It is puzzling
that South Koreans—who denounce Japan’s past history—do not apply the same standard to China.
This arises from the unique psychological attitude among Koreans toward China and Japan. Simply put, the origins of this attitude can be found in Korean nationalist sentiment, which was formed amidst the rise of modern Japan and Japanese colonial rule over Korea. Korea had recognized
Chinese hegemony over Northeast Asia, even adopting an attitude of sadae (submission to greater powers) in bilateral relations. By contrast, there was resistance toward recognizing Japan in the same way when it became a regional power in the modern era. This only intensified after Japan, which Koreans had regarded as a lesser power, annexed and colonized Korea. The gap between this perception and reality developed into a psychological complex. It is this factor that underlies the intense reaction toward Japan’s economic retaliation and the lack of a similar response in the face of similar actions by China

Opposing Japan has been a powerful political weapon for both North and South Korea, which also explains the excesses of nationalism during the era of division on the peninsula.
Nationalism has historically been an ideology of the right. The left criticized nationalism as an invention of the bourgeoisie. On the Korean Peninsula, however, nationalism is deeply ingrained in both Koreas and both the political left and right. One need not look any further than the current wave of anti-Japanese sentiment in South Korea, which is being led by the left. The right, anxious about being branded as traitors or collaborators, is reluctantly joining in the anti-Japanese struggle.China was accepted as a great power,but the Japanese were belittled with epithets like waegu or waenom.


The concept of ressentiment provides valuable insight into the current conflict between South Korea and Japan. Koreans possessed a conscious and subconscious sense of superiority toward Japan, just as Germany did toward the United Kingdom and France.


Consider, for example, the dispute over historical issues. Japan’s attitude is clearly problematic. ,,,,, no amount of apology by Japan will be truly regarded as sincere by Koreans. Most Koreans believe that Japan has not apologized for its past actions. Deep down, Koreans wish to deny the fact that Japan has ever apologized because its attitude was never sincere. This will not change until the day that South Korea
becomes more powerful than Japan


Nationalism can be the basis for anti-imperialist, anti-colonial movements,and it can also provide the psychological impetus for modernization among developing countries. In Korea, nationalism was the ideological foundation of both the struggle against Japanese colonial rule and economic modernization under Park Chung-hee.On the other hand, nationalism can also underlie imperialist or fascist ideology in autocratic regimes. Both North and South Korea aggressively used nationalism to build and consolidate authoritarian rule.


Two factors created an environment in which nationalism fused with chauvinism and populism: worsening economic inequality due to neoliberal globalization, and efforts to advance the rights and interests of minorities and immigrants. The former fueled chauvinism on the left, while the latter did so on the right. In South America, where left-wing populism is widespread, governments are stoking public sentiment by blaming the neoliberal economic order for economic collapse. In Europe and the United States, where right-wing chauvinism is on the rise, minorities and immigrants have become the political scapegoat



Inciting anti-Japanese sentiment with references to “Admiral Yi Sun-shin’s twelve ships” and the National Debt Repayment Movement of 1907, and by calling for a boycott of Japanese products is the very archetype of nationalistic or chauvinistic populism. By bringing this misguided patriotism to the fore, the Moon administration has avoided taking responsibility for ongoing economic difficulties and its neglect of bilateral relations with Japan.

By asserting the binary distinction of “pro- or anti-Japanese” and “patriots or traitors” and thus maximizing anti-Japanese sentiment, the Moon administration avoided taking the blame for its diplomatic misstep. There is no political weapon more effective than anti-Japanese sentiment.

As expected, approval ratings for President Moon and the ruling party skyrocketed.


The history of colonial rule and division has led to an excess of nationalism and a dearth of liberalism on the Korean Peninsula. Both North and South Korea, as well as the political left and the right, have unduly relied on nationalism instead of looking to liberalism



What would Popper make of South Korean society today?
He might have to revise his typology of the enemies of an open society. In South Korea, the enemy of open society is left-wing chauvinism, not right-wing fascism or left-wingMarxism





ナショナリズム論としても優れている。

ただ、小規模とはいえ、移民の受け入れを推進している安倍を欧州の極右と比べれるのは無理があろう。

結局、日本叩きの裡には華夷秩序に基づく日本に対する根深い民族差別意識があるわけで、韓国朝鮮のこの人種差別意識を今後はもっと訴えていくべき。