ふるやの森

地球文明の再生に向かう
(当ブログはリンクフリーです、また相互リンク先を募集中です)

One World Government - A look into the Future

2017-11-02 02:45:38 | 闇の世界史

Signs we see them everyday traffic signs
promotional signs informational signs
signs of every kind all communicating
some sort of message to all sorts of
viewers the consequences of responding
to most signs are obvious the
consequences of ignoring others can be
deadly
for close to  years the John Birch
Society has kept a watchful eye on the
agendas and progression of the United
Nations the Society has one of the
largest research facilities of its kind
which also houses countless articles and
documents that analyze and detail UN
activity using this information along
with commentaries from a host of
authorities some of which you are about
to hear the John Birch Society presents
the United Nations a look into the
future
continuing its practice of financing
abortion the United Nations will not
only promote and even enforce abortion
as a population control measure it will
criminalize any activity opposing the
practice all pro-life organizations will
be closed down their membership lists
confiscated and the identity of their
supporters catalog as persons to be
watched
anyone continuing to protest abortion
will be the recipient of punitive action
should the UN decide for whatever reason
that a larger population is desirable
then its pro-abortion policy will
suddenly be reversed in a totalitarian
society people are considered
commodities just like automobiles or
widget with government planners in
determining the desired number and then
fashioning policies accordingly morality
is not a factor United Nations has given
NGO or nongovernmental organizations
status to all of the very militant
pro-abortion population control
organizations from the United States and
Europe and from around the world most of
whom many of whom at least are funded by
tax-exempt foundations like Carnegie
Ford Rockefeller Foundation's and by the
US government the United Nations is
pro-abortion it is that nobody in
principle not only in its policies but
also in practice it is estimated that
million babies are killed every year
this is a no small measure due to the
United Nations and - it's both its
policy of promoting it intellectually as
well as promoting it in the practical
field so they're very much involved in
population control which means that
they're pro-abortion and they support
abortion worldwide both by funding and
by changing the laws to support abortion
so if there's anybody in this country
who believes in the sanctity of life
they should question the authenticity of
the United Nations
parents who have chosen to teach their
children at home or in private schools
will be notified that they must now
enroll them in government schools no
exceptions will be allowed for
totalitarian policymakers intend to have
the state supplant the family as the
most important institution in the heart
and mind of the child there has been
historically an irreducible conflict
between the state and the family they
each have contended with the other four
premise II in human affairs because to
the extent that the family functions
properly there's very little for the
state to do and every state is of course
run by men and women who want to
increase their powers over other human
beings the way you do that is by giving
the state more and more to do to the
extent that the family operates
efficiently and properly the state is
left without a whole lot to do so it
cannot expand it can only expand by
absorbing functions which are carried
out by non-government entities the
family of course is the most important
the church is another speaker and author
of what's right for all Americans is
Zola Foster I taught high school for
years  years were in Watts South
Central Los Angeles I have seen
firsthand the influence of the United
Nations on our public education system
the United Nations Educational
Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNESCO is the education arm of the
United Nations UNESCO is fast becoming
an international school board this means
parents will have no choice parents will
have no say all children will be under
the direction of UNESCO in  UNESCO
published a ten-part series for teachers
entitled taught world understanding let
me read just one statement
as we have pointed out it is frequently
the family that infects the child with
extreme nationalism the state should
therefore use the means described
earlier to combat family attitudes
that's UNESCO founder and principal of
East Moline Christian school in Illinois
Reverend James R Patrick has authored
America , Gold's , moving the
nation educationally to a new world
order his book analyzes the dangerous
implications of Gold's  the UN
approved educate America Act if we
continue to put the goals  program
in which is an international program
we're going to destroy the very
philosophy that this nation was built
upon so the humanistic philosophy the
status philosophy that has permeated our
curriculum is absolutely destroying our
young people the American people must
run and control their own educational
program to do that they have got to have
the control at the local level which
means that where they've consolidated
the schools moved to the state the state
to the federal and now the federal is
merging into the United Nations and the
philosophy that is coming down through
is absolutely destructive of the ideals
that our nation was founded upon we've
got to start right at that area and go
back to realizing that we're putting in
an international educational program it
is coming down through the United
Nations that has got to be eliminated
first we need to go back to the basics
we need to build families not divide
families and most of all we must get our
nation out of the United Nations
the right to keep and bear arms will be
abolished those retaining ownership of
weapons will be required to turn in all
arms they possess or face severe
penalties
organizations built upon this god-given
right will be raided and all their
records including membership lists will
be seized and forwarded to world
government officials persons whose names
appear in these records will be visited
to assure that all of their weapons have
been delivered to the authorities
Aaron Zelman is chairman of Jews for the
preservation of firearms and has
authored numerous publications including
gun control gateway to tyranny every
single genocide is at one thing in
common first the government will
register firearms and then confiscate
firearms and then demonize a targeted
group of people and you created the
public's mind the attitude well the
government does something forceful to
these people that's alright they
probably had it coming and then once the
government has has disarmed its targeted
group and it's easy for the government
to murder those people is called
genocide registration is the key this is
the it is so crucial that if you want to
control people and you might get their
firearms from them you have to know
where the firearms are and the way to do
that systematically is through
registration the United States is
engaged in doing the very same thing
that's been done in Canada where they've
been disarming people Australia where
they've been disarming people in the
United Nations is that an active hand in
this
I believe those individuals in this
country and there are plenty who believe
that we should have the right to own and
bear arms ought to be concerned what's
happening in innovations because they
are a threat to us they would confiscate
our guns there have been proposals made
at some of their conventions where they
would literally repeal the Second
Amendment and I think that everybody
should be alert to this and realize that
this is not just fun and games and this
is just not a discussion club that we're
dealing with the United Nations is an
organ
Asian that if anybody's interested in
saving life when they hear the name
United Nation they should run in the
opposite direction
the UN will require that the Western
world standard of living including such
achievements as the private automobile
in the single family home be reduced to
a sustainable level such sacrifices will
be mandatory to counter real or imagined
threat such as global warming
destruction of the ozone layer and
rising levels of carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere no real scientific evidence
need be produced the doomsday claims of
course of utopians will survive hence
limitations on family size will be
strictly enforced as an added measure to
protect the world's environment and
government licenses will be required for
couples desiring children William Norman
Gregg has also written freedom on the
altar the UN's crusade against God and
family the President's Council on
sustainable development has put out this
booklet which is entitled population
consumption a taskforce report that
calls for the installation in federal
policy of the goals which were created
the Cairo population control summit back
in  which have to do once again with
what they call stabilizing popular
population i stabilized they're talking
about controlling they're talking about
adopting numerical guidelines and
objectives defined by the united nations
enshrining them in federal policy and
reconfiguring our education policy and
our health care policy to meet the goal
of population stabilization it is a
matter of formal federal policy in our
country to pursue the population goals
outlined by the united nations so not
only do they think they can do it
they're actively pursuing it right now
as we speak it has to do with this
notion that human beings are resource to
be managed rather than individuals with
rights that the state has to protect as
to the environmental aspect of this
there is a dogma in the environmental
movement that holds that human beings
are simply part of the democratic
biosphere that we have no more innate
right to be here than any other species
there are too many of us and we are
exercising our influence the biosphere
in ways that are improper in in order to
reduce the burden upon our holy sacred
mother earth
necessary to reduce the aggregate
numbers of the human population I think
it's rather interesting to note as well
that the type of people who fret about
excess population never considered
themselves to be among the surplus
no longer will anyone be allowed to
protest or counter the ongoing
destruction of property rights planned
by various enforcers of environmental
laws the use of land will no longer be
decided by those who hold title to it in
order to assure a natural and unmanaged
environment along with the recommended
control of the land agents of world
government will spread throughout our
nation to ensure compliance dr. Michael
Kaufman environmental analyst for
sovereignty international and author of
saviors of the earth the politics and
religion of the environmental movement
this particular belief system is really
that philosophical expression of what we
would normally call pantheism the belief
that nature is God God has found in all
things and this is really the official
religion or belief or philosophy of the
United Nations and it's expressed it has
some real downsides to it because it
means basically if a law benefits man at
the expense of nature then that law is
bad because it violates the basic theory
of theology of their belief system that
everything should be equal humans
shouldn't benefit at the expense of
nature now you carry that far enough and
ultimately you get to the point where no
law is good because every law benefits
man at the expense of nature and man
himself is bad this perversion of our US
Constitution were now species has more
rights than the human comes right out of
the United Nations it comes in the form
of the United Nations treaty called sy
T's the convention on the international
trade of endangered species and this is
a United Nations treaty and this is how
the United Nations is beginning to limit
our sovereignty is through these types
of treaties individuals who believe in
the right to own property ought to be
concerned Americans believe in that
they're careless about it sometimes they
allow our governments to regulate too
much into taxes too much but really the
wider private property ownership is
severely threatened by our own
government it's going to be a lot worse
if the united nation gets involved there
is no way that you can have the concept
of private property right they believe
in welfare redistribution socialist
redistribution that everybody
owns everything and they would take from
the wealthy and give to the poor to get
an equal bounce same old story we've
heard for years but they do not protect
the right to own private property by
anything promoted by the United Nations
all members of the US Armed Forces will
be given United Nations insignia along
with the UN military manual this manual
spells out the new requirements
regarding conduct duties and chain of
command u.s. markings will continue to
appear on American uniforms soldiers
wearing them will be employed primarily
as enforcers of peace throughout the
world allowing the rest of mankind to
know that the United States is
cooperating in the establishment of the
New World Order author of changing
commands the betrayal of America's
military John McManus the central thesis
of my book is that our military is being
delivered to the United Nations now I
say that very carefully it's not a case
of the UN taking it over as much as our
own leaders are delivering our military
to the United Nations President John
Kennedy went to the United Nations
September  and he presented the
United States program for general and
complete disarmament in a peaceful world
during a speech and he said this is the
official program of the United States of
America it's a disarmament program it
calls for the United States to turn over
its military to the United Nations let
that sit for a second it calls for the
United States to turn over its military
to the United Nations the program ends
by saying progressive control
disarmament would proceed to a point
where no state would have the military
power to challenge the progressively
strengthened UN peace force the UN would
have all military power one of the great
oxymorons of our time is peace force if
it's forced it's not peace if you define
peace as peace with justice it could be
the Peace of the grave it could be peace
of submission there's all kinds of peace
and there are some people who use the
word peace meaning something quite
different from what the ordinary
American would mean he means peace with
justice peace with freedom peace with a
rule of law that limits the government
not himself so much is this program
still in effect from  well I have
personally called a head of the Arms
Control
disarmament agency in Washington DC in
recent years man named dr. William nari
and asked is this program still the
official policy of the government the
United States oh yes he said yes and
much of it has already been accomplished
which is so so he's confirming what has
been obvious to many of us over many
many years that was   the State
Department finances a document called a
world effectively controlled by the
United Nations all right written by an
MIT professor Massachusetts Institute of
Technology professor named Lincoln P
Bloomfield who certainly happens to be a
member of the Council on Foreign
Relations I just want to read a couple
of things out of it here in the
definitions section he says finally to
avoid endless euphemism and evasive
verbiage the contemplated regime will
occasionally be referred to unblushing
Lee as world government world government
means scrap this scrap the declaration
scrapped the Constitution we're not
going to have world government if the UN
had a monopoly on it on military force
what it would do is what it says in its
own Universal Declaration of Human
Rights it says the rights and freedoms
that we Americans take for granted and
of course we shouldn't they came from
God they came from the Creator the
rights and freedoms may in no case be
exercised
contrary to the purposes and principles
of the United Nations now we've already
gone over the fact that the purpose and
the principles of the United Nations is
to establish a world government with a
monopoly of political and military power
it's it's very clear to me and what we
hope is that it will become far more
clear to an awful lot more of the
American people we've got to get out of
the United Nations
the election process will become the
task of world government monitors the US
Congress president judicial system and
state and local government shall exist
only as a facade to assure American
citizens that they still have a voice in
government checks and balances among
branches of government will be
eliminated the states will become mere
subdivisions of the national government
just as the national government will
become a subdivision of the world
government the Bill of Rights portion of
the US Constitution will be superseded
by the UN Convention on Civil and
Political Rights the US Constitution
will be supplanted by the UN Charter and
consigned to the ash heap of history a
useless relic of the past all other UN
conventions will take effect appointed
officials for state and local regions
will be forced to comply with these
international rules when representing
their sectors there is a fundamental
dichotomy between the United States
system and the United Nations system and
almost every other system and that
fundamental dichotomy comes from the the
thunderous assertion in the declaration
of independence men are endowed by their
creator with certain unalienable rights
we get our rights from God and then they
went on to say to secure these rights
governments are instituted so the United
Nations comes along the United Nations
no God has never been God at the United
Nations so where the rights come from
the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights and they go over and
they list one after another after
another the right of peaceful assembly
shall be recognized no restrictions may
be placed on the exercise of this right
other than those imposed in conformity
with the law in other words we pass a
law you don't have the right the
American system says rights come from
God says government should be limited
and then the Bill of Rights comes along
and says Congress shall make no law
respecting those fundamental rights the
difference between the u.s. system and
the United Nations system couldn't be
more obvious many years ago when I was
in high school in college like millions
of other American
I was an avid supporter of the United
Nations I believed all the many things
that I had learned in grade school and
in high school that after World War two
the founders of the United Nations had
come together to form this beneficent
organization to create world harmony
Brotherhood peace and understanding and
who could be opposed to that it wasn't
until later in my college years that I
began reading the actual United Nations
documents and books which were critical
of the United Nations I began to see the
real problem and it became very apparent
to me that we were headed under the
United Nations toward a convergence of
countries into a global tyranny that's
the title for my book global tyranny
step-by-step we were under the United
Nations and under the rubric of world
Brotherhood an understanding marching
into an intended tearing and it is happe
happening piecemeal gradually
step-by-step tyranny is something which
is fastened upon a people incrementally
because most people have sufficient
sense that they can recognize the
tyrannical proposal Minh has made
explicitly before them the American
perspective is our ticket there by James
Madison is that you discern abuses in
principle and you prevent the abuses by
denying the principle
following the pattern already
established in China only approved
churches adhering strictly to government
dictates regarding religion will be
tolerated all churches desiring to
remain independent of government
compliance will be disbanded their
houses of worship converted to other
uses or simply burned to the ground and
their pastors incarcerated churches
submitting to government regulation will
be forced to modify their beliefs to
conform with the anti-christian attitude
of the Almighty state no exceptions will
be allowed the United Nations hostility
to biblical concepts of faith has to do
once again with the idea that biblical
religions and in this I would include as
well the Islamic religion while it is
not biblical it has similar perspectives
on social responsibilities all these
monotheistic faiths posit something to
which the state is accountable something
to which the state ultimately will have
to give a reckoning for its abuse of
authority to the extent that there is
any doctrine which posits a loyalty
higher to that higher than that which
people had to the state the state is
going to be hostile and something which
proposes to create a global government
as the United Nations unambiguously does
is going to have pitched hostility
towards any doctrine which challenges
its sovereignty over any aspect of human
life the one-world religion will decide
what ethical values they wish to see
brought into each country into each
religion and there will be no choice
because the whole thing is controlled
the entire basis of the one-world
religion is humanism and humanism when
you take it back to its roots is
strictly atheism paganism and eventually
if you trace it back even further you
are actually right into the occult if
United Nations has have has their way
there will be curtailment of our right
to practice religion they are not going
to be believers in in the right to
practice our religious as we have seen
fit throughout this country and
therefore those individuals who are
interested in this subject certainly
cannot be complacent about what the
United Nation
it is certain that these new UN rules
governing the American people won't come
without resistance
but by then resistance will be futile
citizens who attempt to defend whatever
freedoms they have remaining will join
the victims of the inevitable brutality
and bloodbath carried out by a
tyrannical UN dictatorship  though is
still wondering if the United Nations
would actually resort to such atrocities
consider for a moment the UN's lesser
known side the United Nations
organization was originally created by a
small but powerful group of subversives
as a future seat of a one-world
government camouflaged as the world's
last hope for peace and concealed by a
barrage of self-generated propaganda the
UN has been responsible for some of the
most controversial and violent acts of
aggression in history since its founding
in  the UN has made gradual and
significant progress toward the ultimate
goal of its founders world domination
today enormous in size and influence the
UN has a countless number of programs
agendas and conventions ready to
supersede the laws and practices of all
nations most certainly including the
United States
fortunately more and more Americans are
beginning to see the wisdom of what the
John Birch Society has been saying for
well over a tree and a half decades get
us out of the UN March th  Capitol
Hill Texas US Representative Ron Paul
introduces one of the most crucial bills
regarding the future of freedom the
American sovereignty Restoration Act its
purpose to provide for complete
withdrawal of the United States from the
United Nations I don't think we need the
United Nations to be able to talk to
other nations United Nations was
established in  we talked to a lot
of nations before that we have our
embassies we have our ambassadors we can
pick up a telephone these days and talk
to whoever we want around the world so I
do not think that is a legitimate excuse
that is just a an excuse to do the bad
things that the United Nations does
every year since we belong to the United
Nations we have lost a little bit of our
sovereignty and we're moving in that
direction where eventually we will not
have a United States of America and
won't be nothing more than a pawn of the
United Nations it didn't take long for
word to get out soon dr. Paul's office
received messages from other
representatives willing to co-sponsor
the bill and an avalanche of
congratulatory letters from the American
people thanking him for introducing this
crucial bill covered his desk
June th   representatives vote in
favor of the getta south measure a few
years ago it was unlikely if four
representatives would have supported it
even though the measure didn't pass the
numbers are a solid indicator of the
accelerated support for the United
States immediate withdrawal from the UN
and with the help of more and more
Americans Congress will again be forced
to vote whether or not to get us out of
the United Nations for good because
political actors thank you they tend
they tended respond to what they hear
name they think there's enough people in
their district have wanting to vote a
certain way they all of a sudden will
become interested the American people
are starting to wake up I think we're
making a lot of progress and I predict
we're going to get a lot more votes next
time many Americans are working to
influence Congress on important issues
several of which have been discussed in
this program clearly but get us out
issue stands above them all for if we
allow the UN to become an all-powerful
government victories in Congress will
become meaningless and the causes of
single issue activists will be
permanently lost but with your help we
can rescue our nation from the United
Nations and preserve Liberty for
generations to come
effective action is informed organized
action for more information on the UN
threat and what you can do to help get
us out call - guess USA  today ask
for the UN packet



最新の画像もっと見る