第三次世界大戦の書籍はすでに販売されているのですね！それを避ける結論はフランスやイギリス、ドイツがＮＡＴＯから離脱することだと訴えている！ＮＡＴＯがアメリカの世界戦略の尖兵ということだね。日本、アメリカとの軍事同盟大丈夫？
http://eigokiji.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2015/12/post-ae90.html←マスコミに載らない海外記事さんが翻訳していました！（1月2日気がついた！）
Why World War III is on the Horizon
Image: Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 gave birth to a dangerous American ideology called neoconservativism. The Soviet Union had served as a constraint on US unilateral action. With the removal of this constraint on Washington, neoconservatives declared their agenda of US world hegemony. America was now the “sole superpower,” the “unipower,” that could act without restraint anywhere in the world.1991年のソビエト連邦の崩壊により単独のスーパーパワーとして世界に君臨しているＵＳ．Ｕｎｉｐｏｗｅｒ，Ｓｏｌｏ ｓｕｐｅｒｐｏｗｅｒ 新保守主義（ネオコン）
The Washington Post neoconservative journalist Charles Krauthammer summed up the “new reality” as follows:
“We have overwhelming global power. We are history’s designated custodians of the international system. When the Soviet Union fell, something new was born, something utterly new–a unipolar world dominated by a single superpower unchecked by any rival and with decisive reach in every corner of the globe. This is a stagering new development in history, not seen since the fall of Rome. Even Rome was no model for what America is today.”ローマ帝国以来の世界に君臨する、世界システムの後見人になったアメリカ！
The staggering unipolar power that history has given to Washington has to be protected at all costs. In 1992 top Pentagon official Undersecretary Paul Wolfowitz penned the Wolfowitz Doctrine, which became the basis for Washington’s foreign policy.
Paul Wolfowitz
The Wolfowitz Doctrine states that the “first objective” of American foreign and military policy is “to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat [to US unilateral action] on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.” (A “hostile power” is a country sufficiently strong to have a foreign policy independent from Washington’s.)Ｗｏｌｆｏｗｉｔｚドクトリンはアメリカの単独の世界支配構図・構造の維持である。どの国でもアメリカに楯突くのは押しつぶす姿勢か。
The unilateral assertion of American power begin in ernest during the Clinton regime with the interventions in Yugoslavia, Serbia, Kosovo, and the no-fly zone imposed on Iraq. In 1997 the neoconservatives penned their “Project for a New American Century.” In 1998, three years prior to 9/11, the neoconservatives sent a letter to President Clinton calling for regime change in Iraq and “the removal of Saddam Hussein from power.” Neoconservatives set out their program for removing seven governments in five years.クリントン政権時代にユーゴスロバキアやコソボなどに介入、イラクに飛行禁止ゾーンを設けた。新アメリカの世紀の野望はフセイン大統領を引きずりおろすことであり、5年以内に7つの政権を剥奪することだった。やっているね。
The events of September 11, 2001, are regarded by informed people as “the new Pearl harbor” that the neoconservatives said was necessary in order to begin their wars of conquest in the Middle East. Paul O’Neil, President George W. Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, has stated publicly that the agenda of President Bush’s first meeting with his cabinet was the invasion of Iraq. This invasion was planned prior to 9/11. Since 9/11 Washington has destroyed in whole or part eight countries and now confronts Russia both in Syria and Ukraine.９・１１は新パールハーバーで中東の支配のために不可欠だった。イラクの侵略は目的であり、それらは９・１１以前に仕組まれた。八カ国のほとんどあるいは一部を破壊し、シリアとウクライナでロシアと対峙している。
Russia cannot allow a jihadist Caliphate to be established in an area comprising Syria/Iraq, because it would be a base for exporting destabilization into Muslim parts of the Russian Federation. Henry Kissinger himself has stated this fact, and it is clear enough to any person with a brain. However, the power-crazed fanatical neoconservatives, who have controlled the Clinton, Bush, and Obama regimes, are so absorbed in their own hubris and arrogance that they are prepared to push Russia to the point of having their Turkish puppet shoot down a Russian airplane and to overthrow the democratically-elected government in Ukraine that was on good terms with Russia, substituting in its place an American puppet government.狂的な権力志向の新保守主義（ネオコン）の連中はクリントン、ブッシュ、オバマ政権を支配し、神のような傲慢さでトルコにロシア戦闘機を狙撃させることを企て、民主的に選ばれたウクライナ政府をアメリカの傀儡政権に摩り替えた。
With this background, we cn understand that the dangerous situation facing the world is the product of the neoconservative’s arrogant policy of US world hegemony. The failures of judgment and the dangers in the Syrian and Ukrainian conflicts are themselves the consequences of the neoconservative ideology.世界が直面している危険な状況はネオコンの傲慢なアメリカの世界支配（ヘゲモニー）ゆえである。
To perpetuate American hegemony, the neoconservatives threw away the guarantees that Washington gave Gorbachev that NATO would not move one inch to the East. The neoconservatives pulled the US out of the ABM Treaty, which specified that neither the US nor Russia would develop and deploy anti-ballistic missiles. The neoconservatives re-wrote US war doctrine and elevated nuclear weapons from their role as a retaliatory force to a pre-emptive first strike force. The neoconservatives began putting ABM bases on Russia’s borders, claiming that the bases were for the purpose of protecting Europe from non-existent Iranian nuclear ICBMs.彼らは防御のためのＡＢＭ基地ではなく、核を先行攻撃として使用することも辞しない体制にもっていった。存在しないイランのＩＣＢＭシステムからＥＵを護るという詭弁でＡＢＭをロシア国境に配備している。
Russia and Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, have been demonized by neoconservatives and their puppets in the US government and media. For example, Hillary Clinton, a candidate for the Democratic nomination for president, declared Putin to be “the new Hitler.” A former CIA official called for Putin’s assassination. Presidential candidates in both parties are competing in terms of who can be the most aggressive toward Russia and the most insulting toward Russia’s president.大統領候補のヒラリー・クリントンも共和党の候補もプーチンを新ヒットラーだと宣言している。前ＣＩＡ長官はプーチンの暗殺を呼びかけている。彼らは誰がよりロシアやロシア大統領を侮蔑するか、競い合っている。
The effect has been to destroy the trust between nuclear powers. The Russian government has learned that Washington does not respect Washington’s own laws, much less international law, and that Washington cannot be trusted to keep any agreement. This lack of trust, together with the aggression toward Russia spewing from Washington and the presstitute media and echoing in the idiotic European capitals, has established the ground for nuclear war. As NATO (essentially the US) has no prospect of defeating Russia in conventional war, much less defeating an alliance of Russia and China, war will be nuclear.通常兵器ではなく核兵器でロシアや中国に対峙する構えのアメリカである。ロシアはアメリカが国際法を遵守しないと想定している。核にたいする信頼関係の欠如、ロシアへのワシントンの敵意の噴出メディアのプロパガンダ圧力、白痴的ＥＵの国々の有様が核戦争の条件を作っている。
To avoid war, Putin is non-provocative and low-key in his responses to Western provocations. Putin’s responsible behavior, however, is misinterpreted by neoconservatives as a sign of weakness and fear. The neoconservatives tell President Obama to keep the pressure on Russia, and Russia will give in. However, Putin has made it clear that Russia will not give in. Putin has sent this message on many occasions. For example, on September 28, 2015, at the 70th anniversary of the United Nations, Putin said that Russia can no longer tolerate the state of affairs in the world. Two days later Putin took command of the war against ISIS in Syria.戦争を避けるためにワシントンの挑発にプーチンは慎重に対応しているがネオコンの連中は弱さや恐怖ゆえだと誤解している。オバマにもっとロシアに圧力をかけるよう指図しているが、プーチンは9月28日の国際連合70周年記念にロシアは世界の状況にこれ以上甘んじられないと宣言、二日後にシリアのＩＳＩＳに対する指令を出した。
The European governments, especially Germany and the UK, are complicit in the move toward nuclear war. These two American vassal states enable Washington’s reckless aggression toward Russia by repeating Washington’s propaganda and supporting Washington’s sanctions and interventions against other countries. As long as Europe remains nothing but an extension of Washington, the prospect of Armegeddon will continue to rise.ドイツとＵＫは対核戦争に共謀している。ＥＵがワシントンの隷属の立場でいる限り、アルメガドンは起こりえる。
At this point in time, nuclear war can only be avoided in two ways.この時点で核戦争は避けえる.
One way is for Russia and China to surrender and accept Washington’s hegemony.ロシアと中国がワシントンの支配に屈服すること
The other way is for an independent leader in Germany, the UK, or France to rise to office and withdraw from NATO.ドイツ、英国、フランスがＮＡＴＯから離脱すること
That would begin a stampede to leave NATO, which is Washington’s prime tool for causing conflict with Russia and, thereby, is the most dangerous force on earth to every European country and to the entire world. If NATO continues to exist, NATO together with the neoconservative ideology of American hegemony will make nuclear war inevitable.あらゆるＥＵ諸国や世界にとって最も危険な力がＮＡＴＯであり、ワシントンはロシアとの問題を引き起こす主な手段（戦術）にしている。もしＮＡＴＯがアメリカヘゲモニーの新保守主義（ネオコン）イデオロギーと共存し続ける限り、核戦争は避けられない。
