The Tokyo Trials branded pre-war Japan as a militaristic nation.
The U.S. military was surprised at how strong the Japanese forces were in the Pacific War
Immediately after the occupation, judo and kendo were banned in school classes
And he was a so-called mother's boy. He was not a man of character at all.
Top 50 searches for the past week 2021/12/2
Kapitel 5: Botschaft an das japanische Volk
Kapitel 5: Meddelande till det japanska folket
The Brainwashing Project that castrated the Japanese
Глава 5: Послание к японскому народу
The following chapters are re-disseminated from the middle of the previous chapters, with errors, paragraphs, etc., corrected.
I was amazed when I was working on this because there were parts where Naoki Komuro and I were in perfect synchronization.
Was Prewar Japan Militaristic?
The Tokyo Trials branded pre-war Japan as a militaristic nation.
So what is militarism?
If militarism is the concentration of the total power of any nation on war, then the United States was completely militaristic.
Japan was not militaristic in the slightest.
We can see this by looking at the world's most powerful weapons used in World War II.
The U.S. used the atomic bomb. Germany used missiles and jets. The British used radar. Japan used the Zero fighter and the Yamato. In the case of Japan, they simply took technologies that already existed and improved them to the best of their abilities. No new discoveries, no new inventions.
However, suppose Japan had competent leaders and had made preparations earlier. In that case, it might have invented and discovered radar, V.T. fuse (proximity fuse), other radio weapons, and acoustic weapons such as sonar, which would have been competitive with the Allies.
It was a possibility.
In fact, the design and development of jet aircraft were underway.
If we had prepared for this before the war, we might not have lost.
However, in the field of social sciences, there was a massive gap between the U.S. and Japan.
In the U.S., not only natural scientists but also social scientists were mobilized for total war.
A famous example is Ruth Benedict, a social anthropologist who wrote "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword," a book on the Japanese, initially studying the war against Japan.
The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is a social anthropological study of Japan's enemy nation and what it means to be Japanese.
It is just one example.
The U.S. had done an enormous amount of research on the Japanese.
The U.S. feared Japan's retaliatory war.
However, Japan did not even have the idea of using social science for war purposes.
What kind of country is America?
What kind of people are Americans?
We have not done any sociological, psychological, or political research on how Japan should fight against America.
I will leave the details to my book, "The Greater East Asia War: Here It Comes Again" (Crest Publishing), but it is impossible to call such a nation a militarist nation.
If Japan had researched the United States, the Greater East Asia War outcome would have been very different.
When Roosevelt was elected president, he promised that he would never go to war unless the Stars and Stripes were attacked head-on.
The president of the United States must keep his campaign promises.
If the Japanese had understood this and had the first-class strategic thinking to use Roosevelt's pledge for war purposes, they would not have chosen the option of attacking Pearl Harbor. Instead, we could have appealed directly to the American public that stopping the oil supply through the ABCD siege would lead to a war between the U.S. and Japan.
Japan would have won if it had not attacked Pearl Harbor but had attacked the Dutch East Indies (today's Indonesia) and fought only against the Dutch and British.
In fact, except for the Imphal campaign, the Japanese army won all the battles against the British army (see my book above for details).
However, the Japanese did not know American politics.
They did not even know the meaning of campaign promises.
Even today's prime ministers do not know what they are talking about, so the Japanese of that time did not know either.
Many pre-war politicians in Japan were military men or members of noble families.
Of the House of Peers members, the imperial family and the dukes and marquises were not even elected.
Counts, viscounts, and barons were elected from among themselves.
There were no elections for military personnel either.
The prime ministers after Tsuyoshi Inuyo's cabinet were either soldiers or aristocrats.
For example, let's go back to the cabinets before the war started. All the prime ministers, including Fumimaro Konoe, Mitsumasa Yonai, Nobuyuki Abe, and Kiichiro Hiranuma, became politicians without going through elections.
Therefore, they did not know the meaning of campaign promises.
Along with the study of Japanese people, the U.S. made a concerted effort to study history. The U.S. conducted a thorough investigation of history and military history.
The lesson learned was that they must not allow Japan to launch a war of retaliation against the United States. Modern warfare is a war of revenge.
After Napoleon destroyed the Prussian army in Jena (a city in the southwestern part of former East Germany) in 1806, the Prussians became vengeful demons.
When France lost the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71), the French became vengeful demons.
When Germany lost World War I, they became vengeful, and when Hitler came to power, they wanted to kick the Treaty of Versailles to the curb.
The United States learned from modern history.
The primary objective of its occupation policy was to prevent Japan from waging a retaliatory war against the U.S.
The U.S. military was surprised at how strong the Japanese forces were in the Pacific War.
They calculated that if they invaded the Japanese mainland, a million American youths would die.
The U.S. felt that this was no longer something they wanted to deal with.
So it was only natural that the occupying forces disarmed Japan and even went so far as to conduct a sword hunt.
On September 2, 1945, GHQ issued "Order No. 1," declaring that swords found in private homes in the Kanto and Tokai regions were considered weapons and collected at the U.S. Eighth Army Ordnance Supply Depot Akabane, Tokyo. (Evening edition of Asahi Shimbun dated November 1, 1995)
The occupying forces feared that Japan would retaliate against the United States.
They thought swords were meant as a symbol, even if they were not effective in actual warfare.
So they thought that if they let people carry swords, they might revolt at any moment like Geronimo.
Immediately after the occupation, judo and kendo were banned in school classes.
*I laughed many times while translating this chapter into English.
Diet resolution praising MacArthur as a "savior."
However, the Japanese people welcomed the occupation forces led by MacArthur not as conquerors but as liberators.
On April 16, 1951, the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors passed a resolution of thanks to General MacArthur, praising him as "the savior of the troubled and defeated people of Japan" and saying, "The outstanding achievement of promoting the momentum of Japan's independence is something that the whole nation cannot help but be impressed by.
The mass media was also full of praise.
For more information on the circumstances during this period, see Shiro Takahashi's "Verification and Postwar Education (Hiroike Gakuen Publishing For more information on the circumstances during this period, see Shiro Takahashi's "Verification of Postwar Education (Hiroike Gakuen Publishing Department)," but the Mainichi Shimbun article quoted there is an extremely masterpiece.
"Oh, General MacArthur, the General who saved Japan from chaos and starvation, General! Did you see the green wheat blowing in the breeze from your window? The harvest will be abundant this year. It is the result of your efforts over the past five years and eight months, and at the same time, it is a sign of the gratitude of the Japanese people. General! Japan is now able to walk on its own. What can I say to thank you? General! Please take care of yourself." (Evening newspaper, April 17, 1951)
It sounds like an article from the newspaper of some new religion praising its leader, but this was published in one of the three major newspapers in Japan.
Many of the Japanese people also paid MacArthur the utmost praise, calling him "a great saint," "an eternal savior," "a messenger of freedom and fairness," "a respected personality," "an angel," and "the object of admiration for female students. (See Takahashi, above).
Even in the Heisei era, 50 years after the end of World War II, a monument to MacArthur stands in the circumstances ("Friday," September 8, 1995).
However, MacArthur was neither an "upright man" nor a "great saint" as the Japanese revered him as their "savior.
Yes, he was brilliant. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at the top of his class. He had an unprecedented average score of over 98 points during his time at the school.
It was the result of his mother's education.
MacArthur's mother followed her son everywhere he went, repeating the importance of creating an environment conducive to a child's learning.
The MacArthur family permanently moved in search of the best educational environment.
However, MacArthur was just a class curve, talented person.
And he was a so-called mother's boy.
He was not a man of character at all.
According to Noboru Kojima's "Commanding Officer, Bottom" (Bunshun Bunko), his subordinates even sang a song to satirize MacArthur.
Mr. Kojima describes the song as "full of rebellion against the schemes of an elite consciousness that is supremely based on profit and safety. It may be slander, but to invite that kind of slander from one's own subordinates may be judged as a failure as a commander."
It would be an exaggeration to say that MacArthur was a class-curve-talented person, which is the reason why class-curve talented persons were so prevalent in postwar Japan.
In any case, MacArthur's occupation policy was a resounding success.
Japan's public opinion took a 180-degree turn from "Americans and English people are satanic animals that are the Great Satan" to "Japan-US goodwill.
The "Brainwashing Project" that castrated the Japanese
As mentioned in the previous chapter, the Japanese people's personalities, which the Perry Shock had dismantled, were rebuilt in the Japanese Empire.
As a result, a complex of "Perry was good after all" was established.
This Perry became a double image of MacArthur, and the MacArthur Shock reconstructed the Japanese character in postwar Japan.
It is the fundamental reason for the unprecedented success of the MacArthur complex in controlling the Japanese mind.
Never in the history of the world has the occupation policy of a victorious nation been so successful.
The history of the world is that the defeated countries hate the occupying forces, as the occupying troops feared at the outset and rose to take revenge if they were intimidated.
France, for example, Germany, for example.
The Japanese, however, instead of vowing revenge, hailed the soldiers of the victorious nation as "saviors."
Why were the Japanese so easily brainwashed?
The key to solving this mystery is the GHQ (General Headquarters of the Allied Powers), and the existence of the "Japanese Brainwashing Program" (War Guilt Information Program) conducted there.
The War Guilt Information Program objectives were as follows (see "Verification: Postwar Education" above).
(1) To show that the punishment of those found guilty of planning, preparing, initiating, carrying out, or contributing to wars of aggression is ethically justified.
(2) To demonstrate that the ongoing prosecution of suspected war criminals is in the interest of all humankind.
(3) Demonstrate that the punishment of war criminals is necessary to reconstruct a peaceful and prosperous Japan and the future security of the world.
(4)The war criminals are most responsible for the present plight of the Japanese people, but the people themselves are also jointly responsible for allowing or actively supporting the militarist era.
(5) Clarify the responsibility of the Japanese people to avoid the revival of the system that tolerated war crimes.
(6) Demonstrate that various groups in Japan, including politicians, business people, and leading agitators, are responsible for the war.
(7) Demonstrate that war criminals will receive fair and open trials.
(8) Make it clear that honor is not a consideration in determining the form of punishment for those responsible for atrocities to forestall possible criticism of the death sentence, as in the case of General Tomoyuki Yamashita.
(9) Encourage the Japanese people to debate war crimes and war criminals.
In short, the goal was to make it clear that the Tokyo Trials were "ethically justified" and that the Japanese people were "responsible" for waging a "war of aggression" and to instill a sense of war guilt.
The GHQ controlled the mass media and school education to castrate the Japanese people based on this brainwashing plan.
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
I laughed many times while translating this chapter into English.
Diet resolution praising MacArthur as a "savior."
However, the Japanese people welcomed the occupation forces led by MacArthur not as conquerors but as liberators.
On April 16, 1951, the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors passed a resolution of thanks to General MacArthur, praising him as "the savior of the troubled and defeated people of Japan" and saying, "The outstanding achievement of promoting the momentum of Japan's independence is something that the whole nation cannot help but be impressed by.
The mass media was also full of praise.
For more information on the circumstances during this period, see Shiro Takahashi's "Verification and Postwar Education (Hiroike Gakuen Publishing For more information on the circumstances during this period, see Shiro Takahashi's "Verification of Postwar Education (Hiroike Gakuen Publishing Department)," but the Mainichi Shimbun article quoted there is an extremely masterpiece.
"Oh, General MacArthur, the General who saved Japan from chaos and starvation, General! Did you see the green wheat blowing in the breeze from your window? The harvest will be abundant this year. It is the result of your efforts over the past five years and eight months, and at the same time, it is a sign of the gratitude of the Japanese people. General! Japan is now able to walk on its own. What can I say to thank you? General! Please take care of yourself." (Evening newspaper, April 17, 1951)
It sounds like an article from the newspaper of some new religion praising its leader, but this was published in one of the three major newspapers in Japan.
Many of the Japanese people also paid MacArthur the utmost praise, calling him "a great saint," "an eternal savior," "a messenger of freedom and fairness," "a respected personality," "an angel," and "the object of admiration for female students. (See Takahashi, above).
Even in the Heisei era, 50 years after the end of World War II, a monument to MacArthur stands in the circumstances ("Friday," September 8, 1995).
However, MacArthur was neither an "upright man" nor a "great saint" as the Japanese revered him as their "savior.
Yes, he was brilliant. He graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at the top of his class. He had an unprecedented average score of over 98 points during his time at the school.
It was the result of his mother's education.
MacArthur's mother followed her son everywhere he went, repeating the importance of creating an environment conducive to a child's learning.
The MacArthur family permanently moved in search of the best educational environment.
However, MacArthur was just a class curve, talented person.
And he was a so-called mother's boy.
He was not a man of character at all.
According to Noboru Kojima's "Commanding Officer, Bottom" (Bunshun Bunko), his subordinates even sang a song to satirize MacArthur.
Mr. Kojima describes the song as "full of rebellion against the schemes of an elite consciousness that is supremely based on profit and safety. It may be slander, but to invite that kind of slander from one's own subordinates may be judged as a failure as a commander."
It would be an exaggeration to say that MacArthur was a class-curve-talented person, which is the reason why class-curve talented persons were so prevalent in postwar Japan.
In any case, MacArthur's occupation policy was a resounding success.
Japan's public opinion took a 180-degree turn from "Americans and English people are satanic animals that are the Great Satan" to "Japan-US goodwill.
This article contines.
The following chapters are re-disseminated from the middle of the previous chapters, with errors, paragraphs, etc., corrected.
I was amazed when I was working on this because there were parts where Naoki Komuro and I were in perfect synchronization.
Was Prewar Japan Militaristic?
The Tokyo Trials branded pre-war Japan as a militaristic nation.
So what is militarism?
If militarism is the concentration of the total power of any nation on war, then the United States was completely militaristic.
Japan was not militaristic in the slightest.
We can see this by looking at the world's most powerful weapons used in World War II.
The U.S. used the atomic bomb. Germany used missiles and jets. The British used radar. Japan used the Zero fighter and the Yamato. In the case of Japan, they simply took technologies that already existed and improved them to the best of their abilities. No new discoveries, no new inventions.
However, suppose Japan had competent leaders and had made preparations earlier. In that case, it might have invented and discovered radar, V.T. fuse (proximity fuse), other radio weapons, and acoustic weapons such as sonar, which would have been competitive with the Allies.
It was a possibility.
In fact, the design and development of jet aircraft were underway.
If we had prepared for this before the war, we might not have lost.
However, in the field of social sciences, there was a massive gap between the U.S. and Japan.
In the U.S., not only natural scientists but also social scientists were mobilized for total war.
A famous example is Ruth Benedict, a social anthropologist who wrote "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword," a book on the Japanese, initially studying the war against Japan.
The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is a social anthropological study of Japan's enemy nation and what it means to be Japanese.
It is just one example.
The U.S. had done an enormous amount of research on the Japanese.
The U.S. feared Japan's retaliatory war.
However, Japan did not even have the idea of using social science for war purposes.
What kind of country is America?
What kind of people are Americans?
We have not done any sociological, psychological, or political research on how Japan should fight against America.
I will leave the details to my book, "The Greater East Asia War: Here It Comes Again" (Crest Publishing), but it is impossible to call such a nation a militarist nation.
If Japan had researched the United States, the Greater East Asia War outcome would have been very different.
When Roosevelt was elected president, he promised that he would never go to war unless the Stars and Stripes were attacked head-on.
The president of the United States must keep his campaign promises.
If the Japanese had understood this and had the first-class strategic thinking to use Roosevelt's pledge for war purposes, they would not have chosen the option of attacking Pearl Harbor. Instead, we could have appealed directly to the American public that stopping the oil supply through the ABCD siege would lead to a war between the U.S. and Japan.
Japan would have won if it had not attacked Pearl Harbor but had attacked the Dutch East Indies (today's Indonesia) and fought only against the Dutch and British.
In fact, except for the Imphal campaign, the Japanese army won all the battles against the British army (see my book above for details).
However, the Japanese did not know American politics.
They did not even know the meaning of campaign promises.
Even today's prime ministers do not know what they are talking about, so the Japanese of that time did not know either.
Many pre-war politicians in Japan were military men or members of noble families.
Of the House of Peers members, the imperial family and the dukes and marquises were not even elected.
Counts, viscounts, and barons were elected from among themselves.
There were no elections for military personnel either.
The prime ministers after Tsuyoshi Inuyo's cabinet were either soldiers or aristocrats.
For example, let's go back to the cabinets before the war started. All the prime ministers, including Fumimaro Konoe, Mitsumasa Yonai, Nobuyuki Abe, and Kiichiro Hiranuma, became politicians without going through elections.
Therefore, they did not know the meaning of campaign promises.
Along with the study of Japanese people, the U.S. made a concerted effort to study history. The U.S. conducted a thorough investigation of history and military history.
The lesson learned was that they must not allow Japan to launch a war of retaliation against the United States. Modern warfare is a war of revenge.
After Napoleon destroyed the Prussian army in Jena (a city in the southwestern part of former East Germany) in 1806, the Prussians became vengeful demons.
When France lost the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71), the French became vengeful demons.
When Germany lost World War I, they became vengeful, and when Hitler came to power, they wanted to kick the Treaty of Versailles to the curb.
The United States learned from modern history.
The primary objective of its occupation policy was to prevent Japan from waging a retaliatory war against the U.S.
The U.S. military was surprised at how strong the Japanese forces were in the Pacific War.
They calculated that if they invaded the Japanese mainland, a million American youths would die.
The U.S. felt that this was no longer something they wanted to deal with.
So it was only natural that the occupying forces disarmed Japan and even went so far as to conduct a sword hunt.
On September 2, 1945, GHQ issued "Order No. 1," declaring that swords found in private homes in the Kanto and Tokai regions were considered weapons and collected at the U.S. Eighth Army Ordnance Supply Depot Akabane, Tokyo. (Evening edition of Asahi Shimbun dated November 1, 1995)
The occupying forces feared that Japan would retaliate against the United States.
They thought swords were meant as a symbol, even if they were not effective in actual warfare.
So they thought that if they let people carry swords, they might revolt at any moment like Geronimo.
Immediately after the occupation, judo and kendo were banned in school classes.
This article continues.
The following chapters are re-disseminated from the middle of the previous chapters, with errors, paragraphs, etc., corrected.
I was amazed when I was working on this because there were parts where Naoki Komuro and I were in perfect synchronization.
Was Prewar Japan Militaristic?
The Tokyo Trials branded pre-war Japan as a militaristic nation.
So what is militarism?
If militarism is the concentration of the total power of any nation on war, then the United States was completely militaristic.
Japan was not militaristic in the slightest.
We can see this by looking at the world's most powerful weapons used in World War II.
The U.S. used the atomic bomb. Germany used missiles and jets. The British used radar. Japan used the Zero fighter and the Yamato. In the case of Japan, they simply took technologies that already existed and improved them to the best of their abilities. No new discoveries, no new inventions.
However, suppose Japan had competent leaders and had made preparations earlier. In that case, it might have invented and discovered radar, V.T. fuse (proximity fuse), other radio weapons, and acoustic weapons such as sonar, which would have been competitive with the Allies.
It was a possibility.
In fact, the design and development of jet aircraft were underway.
If we had prepared for this before the war, we might not have lost.
However, in the field of social sciences, there was a massive gap between the U.S. and Japan.
In the U.S., not only natural scientists but also social scientists were mobilized for total war.
A famous example is Ruth Benedict, a social anthropologist who wrote "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword," a book on the Japanese, initially studying the war against Japan.
The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is a social anthropological study of Japan's enemy nation and what it means to be Japanese.
It is just one example.
The U.S. had done an enormous amount of research on the Japanese.
The U.S. feared Japan's retaliatory war.
However, Japan did not even have the idea of using social science for war purposes.
What kind of country is America?
What kind of people are Americans?
We have not done any sociological, psychological, or political research on how Japan should fight against America.
I will leave the details to my book, "The Greater East Asia War: Here It Comes Again" (Crest Publishing), but it is impossible to call such a nation a militarist nation.
If Japan had researched the United States, the Greater East Asia War outcome would have been very different.
When Roosevelt was elected president, he promised that he would never go to war unless the Stars and Stripes were attacked head-on.
The president of the United States must keep his campaign promises.
If the Japanese had understood this and had the first-class strategic thinking to use Roosevelt's pledge for war purposes, they would not have chosen the option of attacking Pearl Harbor. Instead, we could have appealed directly to the American public that stopping the oil supply through the ABCD siege would lead to a war between the U.S. and Japan.
Japan would have won if it had not attacked Pearl Harbor but had attacked the Dutch East Indies (today's Indonesia) and fought only against the Dutch and British.
In fact, except for the Imphal campaign, the Japanese army won all the battles against the British army (see my book above for details).
However, the Japanese did not know American politics.
They did not even know the meaning of campaign promises.
Even today's prime ministers do not know what they are talking about, so the Japanese of that time did not know either.
Many pre-war politicians in Japan were military men or members of noble families.
Of the House of Peers members, the imperial family and the dukes and marquises were not even elected.
Counts, viscounts, and barons were elected from among themselves.
There were no elections for military personnel either.
The prime ministers after Tsuyoshi Inuyo's cabinet were either soldiers or aristocrats.
For example, let's go back to the cabinets before the war started. All the prime ministers, including Fumimaro Konoe, Mitsumasa Yonai, Nobuyuki Abe, and Kiichiro Hiranuma, became politicians without going through elections.
Therefore, they did not know the meaning of campaign promises.
Along with the study of Japanese people, the U.S. made a concerted effort to study history. The U.S. conducted a thorough investigation of history and military history.
The lesson learned was that they must not allow Japan to launch a war of retaliation against the United States. Modern warfare is a war of revenge.
After Napoleon destroyed the Prussian army in Jena (a city in the southwestern part of former East Germany) in 1806, the Prussians became vengeful demons.
When France lost the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71), the French became vengeful demons.
When Germany lost World War I, they became vengeful, and when Hitler came to power, they wanted to kick the Treaty of Versailles to the curb.
The United States learned from modern history.
The primary objective of its occupation policy was to prevent Japan from waging a retaliatory war against the U.S.
The U.S. military was surprised at how strong the Japanese forces were in the Pacific War.
They calculated that if they invaded the Japanese mainland, a million American youths would die.
The U.S. felt that this was no longer something they wanted to deal with.
So it was only natural that the occupying forces disarmed Japan and even went so far as to conduct a sword hunt.
On September 2, 1945, GHQ issued "Order No. 1," declaring that swords found in private homes in the Kanto and Tokai regions were considered weapons and collected at the U.S. Eighth Army Ordnance Supply Depot Akabane, Tokyo. (Evening edition of Asahi Shimbun dated November 1, 1995)
The occupying forces feared that Japan would retaliate against the United States.
They thought swords were meant as a symbol, even if they were not effective in actual warfare.
So they thought that if they let people carry swords, they might revolt at any moment like Geronimo.
Immediately after the occupation, judo and kendo were banned in school classes.
This article continues.
The following chapters are re-disseminated from the middle of the previous chapters, with errors, paragraphs, etc., corrected.
I was amazed when I was working on this because there were parts where Naoki Komuro and I were in perfect synchronization.
Was Prewar Japan Militaristic?
The Tokyo Trials branded pre-war Japan as a militaristic nation.
So what is militarism?
If militarism is the concentration of the total power of any nation on war, then the United States was completely militaristic.
Japan was not militaristic in the slightest.
We can see this by looking at the world's most powerful weapons used in World War II.
The U.S. used the atomic bomb. Germany used missiles and jets. The British used radar. Japan used the Zero fighter and the Yamato. In the case of Japan, they simply took technologies that already existed and improved them to the best of their abilities. No new discoveries, no new inventions.
However, suppose Japan had competent leaders and had made preparations earlier. In that case, it might have invented and discovered radar, V.T. fuse (proximity fuse), other radio weapons, and acoustic weapons such as sonar, which would have been competitive with the Allies.
It was a possibility.
In fact, the design and development of jet aircraft were underway.
If we had prepared for this before the war, we might not have lost.
However, in the field of social sciences, there was a massive gap between the U.S. and Japan.
In the U.S., not only natural scientists but also social scientists were mobilized for total war.
A famous example is Ruth Benedict, a social anthropologist who wrote "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword," a book on the Japanese, initially studying the war against Japan.
The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is a social anthropological study of Japan's enemy nation and what it means to be Japanese.
It is just one example.
The U.S. had done an enormous amount of research on the Japanese.
The U.S. feared Japan's retaliatory war.
However, Japan did not even have the idea of using social science for war purposes.
What kind of country is America?
What kind of people are Americans?
We have not done any sociological, psychological, or political research on how Japan should fight against America.
I will leave the details to my book, "The Greater East Asia War: Here It Comes Again" (Crest Publishing), but it is impossible to call such a nation a militarist nation.
If Japan had researched the United States, the Greater East Asia War outcome would have been very different.
When Roosevelt was elected president, he promised that he would never go to war unless the Stars and Stripes were attacked head-on.
The president of the United States must keep his campaign promises.
If the Japanese had understood this and had the first-class strategic thinking to use Roosevelt's pledge for war purposes, they would not have chosen the option of attacking Pearl Harbor. Instead, we could have appealed directly to the American public that stopping the oil supply through the ABCD siege would lead to a war between the U.S. and Japan.
Japan would have won if it had not attacked Pearl Harbor but had attacked the Dutch East Indies (today's Indonesia) and fought only against the Dutch and British.
In fact, except for the Imphal campaign, the Japanese army won all the battles against the British army (see my book above for details).
However, the Japanese did not know American politics.
They did not even know the meaning of campaign promises.
Even today's prime ministers do not know what they are talking about, so the Japanese of that time did not know either.
Many pre-war politicians in Japan were military men or members of noble families.
Of the House of Peers members, the imperial family and the dukes and marquises were not even elected.
Counts, viscounts, and barons were elected from among themselves.
There were no elections for military personnel either.
The prime ministers after Tsuyoshi Inuyo's cabinet were either soldiers or aristocrats.
For example, let's go back to the cabinets before the war started. All the prime ministers, including Fumimaro Konoe, Mitsumasa Yonai, Nobuyuki Abe, and Kiichiro Hiranuma, became politicians without going through elections.
Therefore, they did not know the meaning of campaign promises.
Along with the study of Japanese people, the U.S. made a concerted effort to study history. The U.S. conducted a thorough investigation of history and military history.
The lesson learned was that they must not allow Japan to launch a war of retaliation against the United States. Modern warfare is a war of revenge.
After Napoleon destroyed the Prussian army in Jena (a city in the southwestern part of former East Germany) in 1806, the Prussians became vengeful demons.
When France lost the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71), the French became vengeful demons.
When Germany lost World War I, they became vengeful, and when Hitler came to power, they wanted to kick the Treaty of Versailles to the curb.
The United States learned from modern history.
The primary objective of its occupation policy was to prevent Japan from waging a retaliatory war against the U.S.
The U.S. military was surprised at how strong the Japanese forces were in the Pacific War.
They calculated that if they invaded the Japanese mainland, a million American youths would die.
The U.S. felt that this was no longer something they wanted to deal with.
So it was only natural that the occupying forces disarmed Japan and even went so far as to conduct a sword hunt.
On September 2, 1945, GHQ issued "Order No. 1," declaring that swords found in private homes in the Kanto and Tokai regions were considered weapons and collected at the U.S. Eighth Army Ordnance Supply Depot Akabane, Tokyo. (Evening edition of Asahi Shimbun dated November 1, 1995)
The occupying forces feared that Japan would retaliate against the United States.
They thought swords were meant as a symbol, even if they were not effective in actual warfare.
So they thought that if they let people carry swords, they might revolt at any moment like Geronimo.
Immediately after the occupation, judo and kendo were banned in school classes.
This article continues.
1
ＣＯＰ２６のポイントは２つある。まず、中国は何一つ譲らず、完全に独り勝ちだった…
2
3
太陽光発電事業に参入している外国資本は多い。とりわけ突出しているのが中国資本や中国系資本だ
4
Per coincidenza, questi tre paesi sono classificati come pro-Cina
5
6
日本側の会員は超党派の国会議員だが、中国側には同等の議員はいないという特殊な構造を持つ
7
uno sforzo per chiarire gli umani che hanno reso Moritomo Gakuen una storia per attaccare Shinzo Abe
8
Sono i tedeschi che si abbonano a questo e ad altri giornali.
9
中国が直面している信じがたい停電の態様は、中国に対する天罰であると言っても過言ではない
10
ＴＢＳが反日的報道をする理由を知っていますか？ 元ＴＢＳ社員の独り言 「うちの局がこんなになってしまった経緯をお話しましょう」
11
It is not only an invisible war but also a war of deception.
12
橋本龍太郎元首相が中国のハニートラップにかかっていた事は歴然たる事実である。ましてや川勝おや、である。
13
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/10/31, 19:51
14
通話の相手にそのＷＴＡではなくＩＯＣを選んだのは中国当局である。
15
A small number of leftists have been at the center of the concessions,
16
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/27, 09:30
17
彼らのこの画策を見破るのも、私たちの「グレイト・アウェイク」なのです
18
Suppose they think they are a decent country made up of decent people
19
中国は軍備増強に投下している天文学的な金額を即刻世界に対する賠償金として支払わなければならない。
20
A symbol of Korea that we can't get along
21
Um símbolo da Coreia com o qual não podemos nos dar bem
22
23
The victims of the comfort women issue are us Japanese,
24
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/29, 23:55
25
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/25, 09:05
26
今のNHKはこれをしない。「著作権NHK」とだけ。これは大問題でしょう。
27
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/25, 22:07
28
It is as if they are strangling themselves on their own.
29
30
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/27, 11:41
31
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/29, 08:38
32
Bach - Cantata Wachet auf, ruft uns die Stimme BWV 140 - Van Veldhoven | Netherlands Bach Society
33
Asahi non si scusò nemmeno in quel momento.
34
日本の外相訪中は完璧に間違ったメッセージを海外に出す事に他ならない
35
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/26, 06:17
36
NHK、TBS、テレビ朝日の偏向報道が何故あれほど酷くて執拗なのかを明らかにしている。
37
Top 50 searches for the past week /2021/12/1
38
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1, 00:42
39
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/11/28, 07:55
40
41
42
Un simbolo della Corea che non possiamo andare d'accordo
43
学問、テレビ、新聞、ネット、映画……あらゆる媒体で反日洗脳工作が行われているのです。
44
the number of U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote is about 200 million
45
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1 on 21:25
46
Un symbole de la Corée que nous ne pouvons pas nous entendre
47
BBC Proms 2010 - Bach Day 10 - Sleepers Wake
48
En symbol för Korea som inte kan komma överens
49
その結果、敗戦から75年、左翼でなければ大学に残ることができないほど、日本の学界は左翼の巣窟として腐敗してしまいました。
50
アメーバでの公式ハッシュタグランクイン記事一覧 2021/12/01
1
A small number of leftists have been at the center of the concessions,
2
A symbol of Korea that we can't get along
3
Um símbolo da Coreia com o qual não podemos nos dar bem
4
5
Top 50 searches for the past week /2021/12/1
6
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1, 00:42
7
Un simbolo della Corea che non possiamo andare d'accordo
8
学問、テレビ、新聞、ネット、映画……あらゆる媒体で反日洗脳工作が行われているのです。
9
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1 on 21:25
10
Un symbole de la Corée que nous ne pouvons pas nous entendre
11
En symbol för Korea som inte kan komma överens
12
その結果、敗戦から75年、左翼でなければ大学に残ることができないほど、日本の学界は左翼の巣窟として腐敗してしまいました。
13
アメーバでの公式ハッシュタグランクイン記事一覧 2021/12/01
14
Ein Symbol für Korea, mit dem wir nicht auskommen
15
16
人の発言を角度をつけて我田引水する新聞ジャーナリズムには注意するしかありません。
17
A symbol of Korea that can't get along
18
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1, 14:20
19
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1 on 19:55
20
そのうえ、特別職の国家公務員であるにもかかわらず、何かにつけて政府を批判しつつ、その政府から支援を受けて懐を肥やしてきました
21
私の知人が勤めていた国立大学では、日本史を韓国人の教授が教えていましたし、
22
「学問の自由」という自分たちだけの聖域で傲慢な態度をとってきた左翼学者たちの欺瞞も、ディープステートの悪事同様、
23
Symbol Korei, która nie może się dogadać
24
25
Rakovinové médiá proti národnému záujmu
26
世界に対して損害賠償金を払うどころか、天文学的な金額を軍備増強に投入している国である中国
27
28
Cancerous Media Against the National Interest
29
30
Top 50 searches for the past week / 12/1
31
Syöpämedia kansallista etua vastaan
32
Kræftmedier mod national interesse
33
34
35
Un símbolo de Corea con el que no podemos llevarnos bien.
36
It is a popular page yesterday on ameba 12/1
37
Media rakowe wbrew interesowi narodowemu
38
Krebserregende Medien gegen das nationale Interesse
39
uno sforzo per chiarire gli umani che hanno reso Moritomo Gakuen una storia per attaccare Shinzo Abe
40
It is a popular page yesterday 2021/12/1
41
こんな人間が、まことしやかな嘘でJRの工事開始を遅らせ、まことしやかな嘘の国を利する態様
42
Kreftmedier mot nasjonal interesse
43
Sono i tedeschi che si abbonano a questo e ad altri giornali.
44
45
46
Media cancerogeni contro l'interesse nazionale
47
Раковые СМИ против национальных интересов
48
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1 on 22:55
49
米はAUKUSやクアッド等、インド太平洋地域で新たな枠組みにコミットし、ここから離れる事はない
50
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/10/31, 19:51
つまり、中国は、自民党政治家を片っ端からハニートラップの対象としていたようである。
越前谷知子のプロフィールを消しているあたり、読売はかなり臭いな。
ノルウェーの主要エアラインの一つブローテン航空がテレビＣＭを作った。夕イトルは「日本人」
彼らは、ただ「自己陶酔型シャッター症候群」にかかっているだけなのです。
合計して8億ドルである。この金額は当時のものであるので、貨幣価値を今の時代に換算してみる。
ハニートラップ工作については、事前に諜報工作について教育を受けている職業外交官ですら、簡単に落と
朝日新聞を筆頭に、自分たちの筋書き通りに持っていこうとしているのだから、とんでもない話です。
先進各国は…自分たちから言い出した…これは、勝手に自分たちの首を絞めているようなものだ
筆者はＮＨＫの放送後、九州国際高校と経営母体の日章学園トップへのインタビューを何度も申し入れた。
日ごろ、日本政府を目の敵にしているくせにこれだけはなぜ信を置くのか。
It is a popular page yesterday on goo 11/28
100点満点とすると、トップクラスの高校入学者は、98点前後、最下位クラスのそれは、５点前後、
中華思想を掲げる中国が、かつてのナチス・ドイツと重なる…生存圏確保の意図が透けて見えます
ところで、有権者登録数、つまり投票資格のあるアメリカ市民は約２億人です。
坂上忍「大人の関係になることで彭帥選手も新たなる権力を」発言が物議「最低すぎる」批判の声集まる
すなわち、在日韓国朝鮮人に各ＴＶ局は、乗っ取られていると云う事です。
日中友好議員連盟…中国共産党の統一戦線工作部などの対日政治工作に利用されることが多い
外国籍市民の意思が反映されることは自治をさらに発展させる！…あっ、 ほ。
De slachtoffers van de troostmeisjeskwestie zijn
外相訪中は完璧に間違ったメッセージを海外に出す事に他ならない…その通り。外相には佐藤氏が適任。
we need to face them with a Great Awakening
岸田首相以下の政治家達へ…即刻、この男がこれ以上ない程に国益を損なっている態様を改めよ
セミナーでは、大城悟・沖縄平和運動センター事務局長から新基地・オスプレイパッド建設反対運動が行わ
勝ちが見えたと思ったか、以後、斎藤智子記者がほぼ専従で「被害者、接種中止訴え」とか「ワクチンを打
日本食が爆売れ…イギリスでは消費者の行動が、このような日本を絶賛する動きを裏付けています。
Top 10 real-time searches on goo 11/29, 23:58
正式には「日中両国政府間の記者交換に関する交換公文」と言われるもので、1972年に橋本恕在中国日
Asahi Shimbun nehovorí o prehreškoch Roh Tae-woo
Top 10 real-time searches 2021/12/1, 00:44
ディレクターの新山賢治はNHK理事、NHKエンタープライズ取締役を歴任した大物。伯父がインパール
NHKの左翼ドキュメンタリー屋にとって目の上のたん瘤だった籾井会長が２０１７年初頭に退任し、
元外交官・孫崎享の娘。蛙の子は蛙。反日親韓で悪名高いジャーナリスト。牧師の息子で日本育ち。
ウイグルジェノサイド、香港、台湾…国際社会で窮地に立つ中国の為に“尽くす時”が来た林氏。
ＩＣＰＯが今年二月に世界ウイグル会議総裁のドルクン・エイサに対するテロリスト認定の指名手配を撤回
Top 10 real-time searches on goo12/1 at19:55
「日本は犯罪者」と発言する一方、韓国の原発は安全と評価している。
Top 50 searches for the past week on goo/ 11/26
Kapittel 5: En melding til det japanske folket - MacArthurs "japanske hjernevaskingsplan" fortsatt i kontroll: "Tokyo Trials History View" dominerende lærebøker
Det er kapittelet jeg sendte ut 24. desember 2019.
På en skole der de beste og nest beste ungdomsskoleelevene i prefekturen samles, utpekte en lærer en elev til å stå på talerstolen og holde et foredrag i stedet for læreren fra da han var ungdomsskoleelev.
Jeg kjenner bare to slike personer, jeg var elev ved Sendai Daini High School og Naoki Komuro som high school-elev i Fukushima.
Det burde overbevise leserne om at hvis jeg først ble født for å studere, ville jeg spurt verden om en bok akkurat som Naoki Komuro hvis jeg hadde levd slik.
Kapittel 5: Melding til det japanske folket
MacArthurs "Japanese Brainwashing Project" har fortsatt kontroll
"Tokyo Trials Historical View" dominerer lærebøker
I kapittel 1 påpekte jeg at lærebøker brukt siden 1997 har inkludert beskrivelser av «trøstekvinner», men problemene med historielærebøker er ikke begrenset til «trøstekvinner.
Beskrivelsene av det moderne Japan siden Meiji-tiden er gjennomsyret av selvironiske, mørke og anti-japanske syn på historien.
La oss ta en titt på noen av "utdragene fra store lærebøker" introdusert i Sankei Shimbun (en syvdelt serie fra 6. til 13. august 1996, med tittelen "Barn bruker disse lærebøkene").
"Japan har truffet fotfeste i kontinental dominans. Og fra rundt denne tiden var det en tendens blant japanere til å se ned på koreanere og kinesere." (Shimizu Shoin)
"For koreanere og taiwanere under kolonistyre blir etternavn i japansk stil (Soshi-kaimei) og tilbedelse ved helligdommer tvunget, og utdanning fremmes for å assimilere japanere." (Nihon Shoseki)
«I Sørøst-Asia og stillehavsøyene så vi på innbyggerne som «urfolk» og slaktet de som kritiserte okkupasjonen». (Kyoiku Shuppan)
"Brukt i angrepskrigen av den japanske keiseren ... Min ungdom og middelaldrende mennesker ble tvangsrekruttert og misbrukt i gruver og fabrikker ... Selv jenter var ofre for angrepskrigen" (Teikoku Shoin)
"Selv i dag, 50 år etter krigen, er harmen til ofrene for den japanske invasjonen et tema som ikke må glemmes" (Tokyo Shoseki).
"Det er mennesker som var trøstkvinner, mennesker som ble utsatt for atombomben i Hiroshima og Nagasaki, og mennesker som ble etterlatt i førkrigstidens japanske territorium Sør-Karafuto på slutten av krigen. Nasjonal kompensasjon for disse områdene i Japan har avsluttet, men personlige unnskyldninger og kompensasjon søkes nå. "(Teikoku Shoin)
Det er nok å nevne dette.
Alle lærebøker i historie omtaler Stor-Øst-Asia-krigen som Stillehavskrigen og sier at det var en "angrepskrig.
De skrev at «militarisme» var utbredt i Japan før krigen.
Den beskriver andre verdenskrig som en «kamp mellom totalitarisme og demokrati».
Det er samme historiesyn som de allierte maktene dømte Japan i Tokyo-rettssakene.
Denne artikkelen fortsetter
Kapitel 5: Et budskab til det japanske folk - MacArthurs "japanske hjernevaskeplan" stadig i kontrol: "Tokyo Trials History View" dominerende lærebøger
Det er det kapitel, jeg sendte ud den 24. december 2019.
På en skole, hvor de bedste og næstbedste ungdomsskoleelever i præfekturet samles, udpegede en lærer en elev til at stå på podiet og holde et foredrag i stedet for læreren, fra da han var gymnasieelev.
Jeg kender kun to sådanne mennesker, jeg var elev på Sendai Daini High School og Naoki Komuro som gymnasieelev i Fukushima.
Det burde overbevise læserne om, at hvis jeg oprindeligt var født til at studere, ville jeg have spurgt verden om en bog præcis som Naoki Komuro, hvis jeg havde levet på den måde.
Kapitel 5: Besked til det japanske folk
MacArthurs "Japanese Brainwashing Project" stadig i kontrol
"Tokyo Trials Historical View" dominerer lærebøger
I kapitel 1 påpegede jeg, at lærebøger brugt siden 1997 har inkluderet beskrivelser af "trøstekvinder", men problemerne med historielærebøger er ikke begrænset til "trøstekvinder.
Beskrivelserne af det moderne Japan siden Meiji-æraen er gennemsyret af selvironiske, mørke og anti-japanske historiesyn.
Lad os tage et kig på nogle af "uddragene fra store lærebøger" introduceret i Sankei Shimbun (en syvdelt serie fra 6. til 13. august 1996, med titlen "Børn bruger disse lærebøger").
"Japan har slået fodfæste i kontinental dominans. Og fra omkring dette tidspunkt var der en tendens blandt japanere til at se ned på koreanere og kinesere." (Shimizu Shoin)
"For koreanere og taiwanesere under kolonistyret er efternavne i japansk stil (Soshi-kaimei) og tilbedelse ved helligdomme tvunget, og uddannelse fremmes for at assimilere japanere." (Nihon Shoseki)
"I Sydøstasien og Stillehavsøerne betragtede vi indbyggerne som 'oprindelige folk' og slagtede dem, der kritiserede besættelsen." (Kyoiku Shuppan)
"Brugt i angrebskrigen af den japanske kejser ... Mine unge og midaldrende mennesker blev tvangsrekrutteret og misbrugt i miner og fabrikker ... Selv piger var ofre for angrebskrigen" (Teikoku Shoin)
"Selv i dag, 50 år efter krigen, er vreden hos ofrene for den japanske invasion et spørgsmål, der ikke må glemmes" (Tokyo Shoseki).
"Der er mennesker, der var trøstekvinder, folk, der blev udsat for atombomben i Hiroshima og Nagasaki, og folk, der blev efterladt i førkrigstidens japanske territorium Syd Karafuto i slutningen af krigen. National kompensation for disse områder af Japan er afsluttet, men der søges nu om personlige undskyldninger og kompensation."(Teikoku Shoin)
Det er nok at nævne dette.
Alle historiebøger omtaler krigen i Østasien som Stillehavskrigen og siger, at det var en "angrebskrig.
De skrev, at "militarisme" var udbredt i Japan før krigen.
Den beskriver Anden Verdenskrig som en "kamp mellem totalitarisme og demokrati."
Det er det samme historiesyn, som de allierede magter dømte Japan i Tokyo-processerne.
Denne artikel fortsætter
Kapitel 5: Ett meddelande till det japanska folket - MacArthurs "japanska hjärntvättsplan" fortfarande i kontroll: "Tokyo-prövningens historia" dominerar läroböcker
Det är kapitlet jag skickade ut den 24 december 2019.
I en skola där de bästa och näst bästa högstadieeleverna i prefekturen samlas, utsåg en lärare en elev att stå på podiet och hålla en föreläsning i lärarens ställe från när han var gymnasieelev.
Jag känner bara två sådana personer, jag var elev på Sendai Daini High School och Naoki Komuro som gymnasieelev i Fukushima.
Det borde övertyga läsarna om att om jag föddes först för att studera, skulle jag ha bett världen om en bok precis som Naoki Komuro om jag hade levt så.
Kapitel 5: Meddelande till det japanska folket
MacArthurs "Japanese Brainwashing Project" har fortfarande kontroll
"Tokyo Trials Historical View" dominerar läroböcker
I kapitel 1 påpekade jag att läroböcker som använts sedan 1997 har innehållit beskrivningar av "tröstkvinnor", men problemen med historieböcker är inte begränsade till "tröstkvinnor".
Beskrivningarna av det moderna Japan sedan Meiji-eran är genomsyrade av självironisk, mörk och antijapansk syn på historien.
Låt oss ta en titt på några av de "utdrag ur stora läroböcker" som introducerades i Sankei Shimbun (en serie i sju delar från 6 till 13 augusti 1996, med titeln "Barn använder dessa läroböcker").
"Japan har fått fotfäste i kontinental dominans. Och från ungefär den här tiden fanns det en tendens bland japaner att se ner på koreaner och kineser." (Shimizu Shoin)
"För koreaner och taiwaneser under kolonialt styre tvingas efternamn i japansk stil (Soshi-kaimei) och tillbedjan vid helgedomar, och utbildning främjas för att assimilera japaner." (Nihon Shoseki)
"I Sydostasien och Stillahavsöarna betraktade vi invånarna som "urbefolkning" och slaktade de som kritiserade ockupationen." (Kyoiku Shuppan)
"Används i anfallskriget av den japanska kejsaren ... Min ungdom och medelålders människor tvångsrekryterades och misshandlades i gruvor och fabriker ... Till och med flickor var offer för anfallskriget" (Teikoku Shoin)
"Än idag, 50 år efter kriget, är förbittringen hos offren för den japanska invasionen en fråga som inte får glömmas bort" (Tokyo Shoseki).
"Det finns människor som var tröstkvinnor, människor som utsattes för atombomben i Hiroshima och Nagasaki, och människor som lämnades kvar i det japanska territoriet för kriget i South Karafuto i slutet av kriget. Nationell kompensation för dessa områden i Japan har avslutats, men personliga ursäkter och kompensation begärs nu. "(Teikoku Shoin)
Det räcker med att nämna detta.
Alla historieböcker hänvisar till kriget i Östasien som Stillahavskriget och säger att det var ett "angreppskrig.
De skrev att "militarism" var utbredd i Japan före kriget.
Den beskriver andra världskriget som en "kamp mellan totalitarism och demokrati".
Det är samma syn på historien som de allierade makterna dömde Japan i Tokyorättegångarna.
Den här artikeln fortsätter
第五章 給日本民眾的訊息——麥克阿瑟的“日本洗腦計劃”仍在掌控中：“東京審判歷史觀”主導教科書
這是我在 2019 年 12 月 24 日發出的章節。
在一所縣內最好的和第二好的初中學生聚集的學校裡，一名老師從高中生開始就指定一名學生站在講台上代替老師講課。
我只認識兩個這樣的人，我是仙台第一高中的學生，而福島高中生小室直樹。
它應該讓讀者相信，如果我最初是為了學習而生的，如果我曾經那樣生活，我會像小室直樹那樣向世界提出一本書。
第五章 致日本人民的訊息
麥克阿瑟的“日本洗腦計劃”仍在掌控之中
“東京審判史觀”主導教科書
在第一章中，我指出1997年以後使用的教科書都有對“慰安婦”的描述，但歷史教科書的問題並不限於“慰安婦”。
明治時代以來對現代日本的描述充滿了自嘲、黑暗和反日的歷史觀。
讓我們來看看產經新聞（1996 年 8 月 6 日至 13 日的七部分系列，題為“孩子們正在使用這些教科書”）中介紹的一些“主要教科書摘錄”。
“日本已經在大陸統治上站穩腳跟。從這個時候開始，日本人有一種看不起韓國人和中國人的傾向。” (清水書院)
“對於殖民統治下的韓國人和台灣人來說，日本式的姓氏（Soshi-kaimei）和神社崇拜是被迫的，並且正在促進教育以同化日本人。” (日本書石)
“在東南亞和太平洋島嶼，我們將居民視為‘原住民’，那些批評佔領的人。” (京育書盤)
“在日本天皇的侵略戰爭中使用......我的青年和中年人在礦山和工廠被強行招募和虐待......甚至女孩也是侵略戰爭的受害者”（Teikoku Shoin）
“即使在戰後 50 年的今天，日本侵略受害者的怨恨也是一個不能忘記的問題”（東京書石）。
“有人是慰安婦，有人在廣島和長崎暴露在原子彈中，有人在戰後留在戰前的日本領土南唐太府，日本這些地區的國家賠償已經結束，但現在正在尋求個人道歉和賠償。”（Teikoku Shoin）
提到這一點就足夠了。
所有歷史教科書都將大東亞戰爭稱為太平洋戰爭，並說這是一場“侵略戰爭”。
他們寫道，“軍國主義”在戰前的日本很普遍。
它將第二次世界大戰描述為“極權主義與民主之間的戰爭”。
協約國在東京審判中對日本的判斷與歷史觀點相同。
這篇文章繼續
第五章 给日本民众的讯息——麦克阿瑟的“日本洗脑计划”仍在掌控中：“东京审判历史观”主导教科书
这是我在 2019 年 12 月 24 日发出的章节。
在一所县内最好的和第二好的初中学生聚集的学校里，一名老师从高中生开始就指定一名学生站在讲台上代替老师讲课。
我只认识两个这样的人，我是仙台第一高中的学生，而福岛高中生小室直树。
它应该让读者相信，如果我最初是为了学习而生的，如果我曾经那样生活，我会像小室直树那样向世界提出一本书。
第五章 致日本人民的讯息
麦克阿瑟的“日本洗脑计划”仍在掌控之中
“东京审判史观”主导教科书
在第一章中，我指出1997年以后使用的教科书都有对“慰安妇”的描述，但历史教科书的问题并不限于“慰安妇”。
明治时代以来对现代日本的描述充满了自嘲、黑暗和反日的历史观。
让我们来看看产经新闻（1996 年 8 月 6 日至 13 日的七部分系列，题为“孩子们正在使用这些教科书”）中介绍的一些“主要教科书摘录”。
“日本已经在大陆统治上站稳脚跟。从这个时候开始，日本人有一种看不起韩国人和中国人的倾向。” (清水书院)
“对于殖民统治下的韩国人和台湾人来说，日本式的姓氏（Soshi-kaimei）和神社崇拜是被迫的，并且正在促进教育以同化日本人。” (日本书石)
“在东南亚和太平洋岛屿，我们将居民视为‘原住民’，屠杀那些批评占领的人。” (京育书盘)
“在日本天皇的侵略战争中使用......我的青年和中年人在矿山和工厂被强行招募和虐待......甚至女孩也是侵略战争的受害者”（Teikoku Shoin）
“即使在战后 50 年的今天，日本侵略受害者的怨恨也是一个不能忘记的问题”（东京书石）。
“有人是慰安妇，有人在广岛和长崎暴露在原子弹中，有人在战后留在战前的日本领土南唐太府，日本这些地区的国家赔偿已经结束，但现在正在寻求个人道歉和赔偿。”（Teikoku Shoin）
提到这一点就足够了。
所有历史教科书都将大东亚战争称为太平洋战争，并说这是一场“侵略战争”。
他们写道，“军国主义”在战前的日本很普遍。
它将第二次世界大战描述为“极权主义与民主之间的战争”。
协约国在东京审判中对日本的判断与历史观点相同。
这篇文章继续
