９割以上の娼婦が暴力をうけ、殺害される率は一般女性の１２倍

UK banker Jutting on double murder charge grins as leaves court - Yahoo News

香港でイギリス人銀行員がインドネシア人二人を残忍な仕方で殺害。取調べ後に車に乗るさい、不敵な笑みを浮かべている。

Inside Angeles City where Rurik Jutting went for debauched holidays | Daily Mail Online

その銀行員が香港に行く前には、フィリピンに滞在。ここでも行方不明になっている生産業従事者が・・・

Inside Angeles City where Rurik Jutting went for debauched holidays | Daily Mail Online

フィリピンでは貧困で、多くの若い女性が売春にたずさわることになっている、と。

Make prostitution legal? No, it will still be a vile trade | Catherine Bennett | Comment is free | The Guardian

　売春を合法化しよいうという動きがあるが、それは売春の実態を把握していない、と。

No matter if they curbed a trade in which 93% of employees were found, by one frontline service, to have experienced violence, and in which the risk to a woman of being killed is 12 times greater than if she were not in prostitution,


In fact, to insist on complete separation of the worlds of the prostituted and the non-prostituted only perpetuates, albeit in a less offensive-looking manner, the evaluation of the late Sir Michael Havers, when he reflected on the victims of the serial murderer, Peter Sutcliffe, who killed 13 women. “Some were prostitutes,” he told the court, “but perhaps the saddest part of this case is that some were not. The last six attacks were on totally respectable women.” To be fair to Havers, a recent Time magazine headline, about the Hong Kong murder victims makes a similar distinction: “Not Just Sex Workers.”



Adams pointed out: “Exploitation is rife in many industries – look at fruit picking and domestic work – but nobody tries to ban it. Why this double standard with sex workers? And why not decriminalise working collectively from a premises (a brothel) where it is 10 times safer than working on the street?”





Not that it should need explaining to anyone who already opposes, on principle, the commodification of, say, wombs, organs, blood and gametes. “The daily experience of being prostituted is not something words can adequately express,” she writes. “How can you form together words and sentences to convey the understanding of what it is for your body to no longer be your own? To express in words what it is for the orifices of your body to be as public as any train station or public bathroom?”



In practice, it has been discovered, when prostitution is legalised, coercion and trafficking can flourish as never before, and women still shun registration when they pay rent in the kind of giant women-supermarkets now proliferating in Germany. One extraordinary report , by a Telegraph writer, described an inundation of sex workers and sex tourists that is reducing women to levels of bargain-basement commodification that makes the average Hong Kong bar look like teatime at the Fawcett Society.

　９３％の娼婦が暴力をうけたことがあるといい、殺害される件数は、一般女性の１２倍、連続殺人で、殺害されても、娼婦の殺害は軽くみられ、ドイツの例をみると、仮に合法化されても、強制や人身売買は絶えることはなかった、と。

　売春よりも買春を罰せよ、という立場のようである。

　日本の場合、

単に売春をしたり、その客となっただけでは、この法律で処罰されるわけではない。売春そのものは禁止されているのだが、罰則規定がないからだ。

「この法律は、たとえば、売春の『勧誘』（5条）を処罰対象としています。公衆の目にふれるような方法で売春の勧誘をしたり、公共の場所で、勧誘を目的として他人につきまとったりすれば、処罰されます。

また、他人に売春をさせたり、売春を助長するような行為も処罰されます。たとえば、他人に売春を『周旋』したり（6条）、人をだましたり困惑させて売春をさせたり（7条）、売春をさせる契約を結んだり（10条）、売春を行うための場所を提供したり（11条）、売春をさせる業を営んだり（12条）……といった行為です」

なお、相手が子どもの場合は、話は全く異なるという。小西弁護士は次のように指摘し、注意を呼びかけていた。

「売春の相手方が18歳未満の青少年だった場合、買った側は児童買春・児童ポルノ禁止法違反で厳しく処罰されます。また、買春の相手が満13歳に満たない女子だった場合、たとえ同意があり、暴行や脅迫がない場合でも、強姦罪となります（刑法177条、3年以上の有期懲役）。この場合は、たとえお金を渡していなくても罰せられます」

といわれている。

これで汚名がそそげると思っているのか、産経？

2014.11.11 11:30
【東京特派員】
「性奴隷」とまで引き上げられた日本の〝悪辣度〟　汚名をそそぐ反論があった

昭和２０年９月、敗戦後の日本本土に進駐してきた米兵の相手をする酌婦、娼婦（しょうふ）が、町の娘を守る「性の防波堤」として慰安施設で働いた。私が調べた千葉県でいえば、翌２１年の記録では慰安婦が２２警察署管内で６２４人もいた。

　この頃の主要都市では、米兵向けの街娼が「パンパン」と呼ばれ、特定の米兵だけを相手とする売春婦を「オンリー」といった




満州国奉天省海城県警察で慰安婦を扱った元経済保安股（課）長は、「殆（ほとん）ど朝鮮の人だったが、戸籍謄本と医者の健康診断書、それと親の承諾書、本人の写真、そして許可申請を一括して私の所に持って来る訳です。ですから、強制連行とか、さらって来たなんて云（い）うものではない。何でさらわれて来た者に親の承諾書や戸籍謄本がついてるのか」と語った。

　また、第６師団工兵第６連隊の所属兵が朝鮮人女性から聞いた身の上話は、「十八歳の私のからだは、三百円、それに父の負債が八十円、合計三百八十円を私の前で『ゼゲン』は両親に手渡した」という悲しい顛末（てんまつ）だった。彼女はその日の夕方、他の１５人の女性たちと一緒に２人の「女衒（ぜげん）」に連れられ、３日後に朝鮮人が経営する上海の慰安所に入ったという。

　歩兵第２１６連隊第３大隊本部付陸軍主計軍曹の話では、朝鮮人の斡旋（あっせん）業者が人を介して接近してきた。この軍曹は「大隊の関与は建物の建設と軍医による性病検診、利用規則を作ることだった」と述べる。慰安所で働く朝鮮人慰安婦は平均月収（手取り）が１５０円から２２０円、月額最低１５０円を故郷に送金していたと証言している。

　証言の解説を担当した東京基督教大学の西岡力教授は、「貴重な証言を残してくださった中村代表と証言者に感謝する」と述べ、本来は政府がなすべき事業ではなかったかと疑問を投げる。軍・官３９人による「会報」の記録は、「強制連行」の汚名をそそぐ率直な反論であった。（湯浅博）

　これでも汚名がそそげると思っているのか、産経？

　今回の朝日の訂正騒動は、結局、日本の右傾化が深まった、としか、英米では報道されていない。

　貧困と借金で、女は売春婦になり、軍人の相手をさせただけだーーーそれで、汚名がそそがれると思っているのか、産経新聞。

いや、彼女らが不幸だったのは認める、というなら、日本の慰安婦への謝罪は認めたうえで、いまだ、その不幸と屈辱が癒されていない米軍慰安婦のために人肌脱ぐことこそ、日本の名誉ある仕事である、と思わないか？


（慰安婦）

”東京の女は首を絞めた上で頭を股間にひっつけてやればいい”

女性侮蔑の「ナンパ講師」、近く来日予定　入管に「入国拒否」求めて3万4000人がネット署名
2014/11/10 19:37

Jcastが記事にしたか。

英豪の主要紙が取り上げていることをみても、日本の大手のメディアが取り上げないのはいかがなものか？

これ、とにかく、ネトウヨに関与させたくないーーーろくなことはない。

米軍慰安婦問題でも、waiwaiでも、、本来、フェミの守備範囲であるにもかかわらず、日本のフェミが沈黙してしまうのもいかがなものか、と思うぞーーーなさけないね。

”America Needs Shinzo Abe ”

America Needs Shinzo Abe
Building a relationship with Japan’s prime minister would do more than just strengthen the U.S.-Japan strategic alliance.

r

Larger
By ARTHUR HERMAN
Nov. 10, 2014 12:53 p.m. ET

残念読めないわ。

イエスは娼婦と結婚、二人の子持ち

Jesus 'married Mary Magdalene and had children', according to ancient manuscript

イエスは娼婦と結婚し、二人の子持ちだった、ことを示す文書が発掘され、話題になっている。

異教徒にとっては、どーでもいいといえば、どーでもいいんだが、娼婦と結婚して、子持ちのおっさんが人の道を説いていた、としたら魅力的ではある。


Is this proof Jesus married and had two sons? Ancient manuscript said to be 'lost gospel' with a sensational twist
New book 'The Lost Gospel' claims Mary Magdalene was original Virgin Mary
It is based on manuscript found in British Library dating back 1,450 years
Professor Barrie Wilson and writer Simcha Jacobovici translated text
They claim there was an assassination attempt on Mary's two children
Church of England has dismissed claims comparing it to Dan Brown's work
By HARRY MOUNT FOR THE DAILY MAIL
PUBLISHED: 11:54 GMT, 9 November 2014 | UPDATED: 08:06 GMT, 10 November 2014

Central to their claim is that Joseph was actually Jesus — and that Aseneth was actually Mary Magdalene.

ただ、そうしたおっさんというより、もともと、旧約とかにでてくる、ヨゼフとアセナテ　とかいうひとたちが、実は、イエスとその妻だった、ということらしい。

Joseph and Aseneth


Joseph and Aseneth

Summary:


まああ、どーでもいいわけだが、この手の、歴史上のイエスといわれる人物についても諸説あるので、そもそも歴史上のイエスは存在せず、もとから、あった神話に歴史上の場所や人物をテキトーにあてはめたのが新約聖書だ、というのが先日の記事にありましたね。

New Rules or a Game without Rules.

「今日の世界が直面する脅威は西側が自ら作り出した」 ウクライナ危機後のプーチン演説
プーチン大統領が描く21世紀の世界（前篇）
2014年11月10日（Mon）　 小泉悠 （財団法人未来工学研究所客員研究員）


SATURDAY, OCTOBER 25, 2014
Putin's speech at the Valdai Club - full transcript

The Cold War ended, but it did not end with the signing of a peace treaty with clear and transparent agreements on respecting existing rules or creating new rules and standards. This created the impression that the so-called ‘victors’ in the Cold War had decided to pressure events and reshape the world to suit their own needs and interests.



We have entered a period of differing interpretations and deliberate silences in world politics. International law has been forced to retreat over and over by the onslaught of legal nihilism. Objectivity and justice have been sacrificed on the altar of political expediency. Arbitrary interpretations and biased assessments have replaced legal norms. At the same time, total control of the global mass media has made it possible when desired to portray white as black and black as white.



The very notion of ‘national sovereignty’ became a relative value for most countries. In essence, what was being proposed was the formula: the greater the loyalty towards the world’s sole power centre, the greater this or that ruling regime’s legitimacy.



The measures taken against those who refuse to submit are well-known and have been tried and tested many times. They include use of force, economic and propaganda pressure, meddling in domestic affairs, and appeals to a kind of ‘supra-legal’ legitimacy when they need to justify illegal intervention in this or that conflict or toppling inconvenient regimes. Of late, we have increasing evidence too that outright blackmail has been used with regard to a number of leaders. It is not for nothing that ‘big brother’ is spending billions of dollars on keeping the whole world, including its own closest allies, under surveillance.




They once sponsored Islamic extremist movements to fight the Soviet Union. Those groups got their battle experience in Afghanistan and later gave birth to the Taliban and Al-Qaeda. The West if not supported, at least closed its eyes, and, I would say, gave information, political and financial support to international terrorists’ invasion of Russia (we have not forgotten this) and the Central Asian region’s countries. Only after horrific terrorist attacks were committed on US soil itself did the United States wake up to the common threat of terrorism. Let me remind you that we were the first country to support the American people back then, the first to react as friends and partners to the terrible tragedy of September 11.




What was the result? Tens of thousands of soldiers, officers and former Baath Party activists were turned out into the streets and today have joined the rebels’ ranks. Perhaps this is what explains why the Islamic State group has turned out so effective? In military terms, it is acting very effectively and has some very professional people.




It does not matter who takes the place of the centre of evil in American propaganda, the USSR’s old place as the main adversary. It could be Iran, as a country seeking to acquire nuclear technology, China, as the world’s biggest economy, or Russia, as a nuclear superpower.





The United States always told its allies: “We have a common enemy, a terrible foe, the centre of evil, and we are defending you, our allies, from this foe, and so we have the right to order you around, force you to sacrifice your political and economic interests and pay your share of the costs for this collective defence, but we will be the ones in charge of it all of course.” In short, we see today attempts in a new and changing world to reproduce the familiar models of global management, and all this so as to guarantee their [the US’] exceptional position and reap political and economic dividends.




We already see that more and more countries are looking for ways to become less dependent on the dollar and are setting up alternative financial and payments systems and reserve currencies. I think that our American friends are quite simply cutting the branch they are sitting on. You cannot mix politics and the economy, but this is what is happening now. I have always thought and still think today that politically motivated sanctions were a mistake that will harm everyone, but I am sure that we will come back to this subject later.




I want to point out that we did not start this. Once again, we are sliding into the times when, instead of the balance of interests and mutual guarantees, it is fear and the balance of mutual destruction that prevent nations from engaging in direct conflict. In absence of legal and political instruments, arms are once again becoming the focal point of the global agenda; they are used wherever and however, without any UN Security Council sanctions. And if the Security Council refuses to produce such decisions, then it is immediately declared to be an outdated and ineffective instrument.




The more we all face common problems, the more we find ourselves in the same boat, so to speak. And the logical way out is in cooperation between nations, societies, in finding collective answers to increasing challenges, and in joint risk management




I will add that international relations must be based on international law, which itself should rest on moral principles such as justice, equality and truth. Perhaps most important is respect for one’s partners and their interests. This is an obvious formula, but simply following it could radically change the global situation.




Colleagues, Russia made its choice. Our priorities are further improving our democratic and open economy institutions, accelerated internal development, taking into account all the positive modern trends in the world, and consolidating society based on traditional values and patriotism.

We have an integration-oriented, positive, peaceful agenda; we are working actively with our colleagues in the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, BRICS and other partners. This agenda is aimed at developing ties between governments, not dissociating. We are not planning to cobble together any blocs or get involved in an exchange of blows.





The allegations and statements that Russia is trying to establish some sort of empire, encroaching on the sovereignty of its neighbours, are groundless. Russia does not need any kind of special, exclusive place in the world – I want to emphasise this. While respecting the interests of others, we simply want for our own interests to be taken into account and for our position to be respected.

　タテマエ論、といえば、それまでだが、わりにしっかりした論述だ。

　冷戦後のアメリカが仮想敵をつくって同盟を従わせ、やりたい放題にやってきたやり方と、その帰結に憤りを感じているようである。

　アメリカに従わないものへの仕打ちは、誰もが知っている話じゃないか、と。

　ここらへんは、チョムスキーによるアメリカのファフィアドクトリンを彷彿とさせる。

　英語圏では、アングロサクソンから離れるにつれ、ソトモノと扱われがちであるが、ロシアも国際法、そして、その背後にある正義、平等、真実を尊重するというのだから、とくに違った価値観を唱導する怪物でもない。

　ロシアの利益も考慮にいれれば、対話には応じる、という姿勢がどこまで、本当なのか、そこらへんが微妙なところではあるが、英語圏のプーチンの評価はちょっと悪すぎはしないか、とも思う。

私立幼稚園学費年200万円？

フォロー

めいろま
‏@May_Roma

欧州の社会保障絶賛してる人がいるが英の場合は年収600万ぐらい超えると恩恵はほとんどないぞ。まともな学校は私立ばっかだし、大学学費も国立でも年150万とかだし、保育所は月18万だぞ。しかも保育時間は日本より短い。私立幼稚園学費年200万円

https://twitter.com/May_Roma/status/531602193305313280

この人、出羽の守かとおもったら、そうでもないのか。

資料がほしいところですね。

以前、在日特派員協会の記者だか、がしっかり調べもしないで適当に書いていたことがあったっけ。