韓半島の平和と繁栄、統一に向けた板門店宣言
⑥ 南と北は、民族経済の均衡ある発展と共同繁栄を達成するために、10・4宣言で合意された事業を積極的に推進して行き、一次的に東海線および京義線鉄道と道路を接続して近代化し、活用するための実践的な対策を取っていくことにした。
② 南と北は西海の北方限界線一帯を平和水域とし、偶発的な軍事的衝突を防止し、安全な漁労活動を確保するための実際的な対策を立てていくことにした。
mozu
@mozumozumozu
フォローする @mozumozumozuをフォローします
その他
Nice try, North Korea and South Korea, but your pledges are airy, empty confections By Bruce Klingner
過去の誤ちの繰り返しだし、
韓国の漁業権の譲歩、国連決議や米法違反の疑いもある、と。
⑥ 南と北は、民族経済の均衡ある発展と共同繁栄を達成するために、10・4宣言で合意された事業を積極的に推進して行き、一次的に東海線および京義線鉄道と道路を接続して近代化し、活用するための実践的な対策を取っていくことにした。
② 南と北は西海の北方限界線一帯を平和水域とし、偶発的な軍事的衝突を防止し、安全な漁労活動を確保するための実際的な対策を立てていくことにした。
mozu
@mozumozumozu
フォローする @mozumozumozuをフォローします
その他
Nice try, North Korea and South Korea, but your pledges are airy, empty confections By Bruce Klingner
But when I read the Panmunjom Declaration, and reread the many North Korean pledges of the last 40 years, I come away feeling a lot like Bill Murray in the movie "Groundhog Day.
Friday's declaration is replete with generalities and bereft of detailed plans or commitments, particularly on denuclearization. Its boilerplate language and ideas have been lifted from previous agreements and joint statements, in 1972, 1992, 2000 and 2007. Can Moon and Kim be penalized for plagiarism?
In the Panmunjom Declaration, Moon and Kim committed their countries to "completely cease all hostile acts against each other." Indeed, the two leaders "solemnly declared" that "there will be no more war on the Korean Peninsula and thus a new era of peace has begun." But in 1972, the Koreas futilely agreed to "implement appropriate measures to stop military provocation which may lead to unintended military conflict." In 1992, they vowed not to "use force against each other [or] undertake armed aggression against each other." In 2007, Seoul and Pyongyang agreed to "adhere strictly to their obligation to nonaggression."
None of those pledges constrained North Korea from conducting assassination attempts on the South Korean president, terrorist acts, military and cyber attacks and acts of war.
The maritime zone met resistance in 2007 because it appears to cede South Korean fishing rights in the crab- and fish-rich West Sea area along with South Korean sovereignty in an area defended at cost of life by the South Korean navy. The long list of balanced-economic-growth infrastructure projects requires extremely unbalanced transfers of South Korean wealth to the North — which younger South Koreans particularly object to — and they are arguably in violation of U.N. resolutions and U.S. law.
The Panmunjom Declaration doesn't address denuclearization — the main impediment to reducing tension and enabling Korean reconciliation — until its penultimate paragraph.
North Korea's nuclear weapons are, of course, already in violation of its commitment to the 1992 Joint Declaration of South and North Korea on the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. As in other subsequent inter-Korean agreements, this one refrains from pointing that out.
過去の誤ちの繰り返しだし、
The maritime zone met resistance in 2007 because it appears to cede South Korean fishing rights in the crab- and fish-rich West Sea area along with South Korean sovereignty in an area defended at cost of life by the South Korean navy. The long list of balanced-economic-growth infrastructure projects requires extremely unbalanced transfers of South Korean wealth to the North — which younger South Koreans particularly object to — and they are arguably in violation of U.N. resolutions and U.S. law.
韓国の漁業権の譲歩、国連決議や米法違反の疑いもある、と。
