Japanese and Koreans invaded Asia. We apologize.

They just chose one who won't help them

2016年11月26日 21時28分52秒 | Weblog




In short, the metropolis has economic power but little political power. The American countryside has limited economic power but vast political power.


The rural party won. And it won on a Trump-ish promise—stop immigration, close the door on refugees—that threatens metropolitan success and undermines rural America’s best hope for an economic renaissance.


Basically, the status quo is working in cities, and a vote for Hillary Clinton was a vote for the status quo.


In the most-recent economic recovery, large counties added new businesses while small counties lost them. Large counties, too, added millions of jobs; small counties barely added any. Workers in urban areas now earn as much as 33 percent more than their rural counterparts.



The fact that immigrants are good for society shouldn’t need to be reiterated in this nation of immigrants. But it’s true: Immigrants are more likely to start businesses than native-born Americans. (In 2011, immigrants accounted for 28 percent of all new businesses in the United States.) They’re more likely to be self-employed. They’re more likely to work in crucial science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. They make indelible contributions to American culture, of course. And they have long helped fill up, prop up, and revitalize downtrodden areas of American cities. Now, they’re doing the same in the countryside


The fact that immigrants are good for society shouldn’t need to be reiterated in this nation of immigrants. But it’s true: Immigrants are more likely to start businesses than native-born Americans. (In 2011, immigrants accounted for 28 percent of all new businesses in the United States.) They’re more likely to be self-employed. They’re more likely to work in crucial science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. They make indelible contributions to American culture, of course. And they have long helped fill up, prop up, and revitalize downtrodden areas of American cities. Now, they’re doing the same in the countryside


The flip side to that story, as reported recently in the Wall Street Journal, is that counties that have “seen the most rapid demographic change” in the past decade and a half voted overwhelmingly—67 percent to 29 percent—for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. America’s small towns are in desperate need of new residents. Yet in those places where that infusion has arrived, white voters chose to line up behind a candidate whose xenophobia surpassed what most of us believed was possible in American politics.


Trump country has elected a president who will harass, deport, and bar the very people desperate to live there, the people who would help rebuild its small towns and cities.



都市部は金はあるが、政治力がなく、地方は金はないが、政治力がある。

民主党は地方で負けた。

小さな田舎町でも移民によって活気づくのに、その移民を排除する大統領を選んでしまったーーー自分たちに役立たたに大統領を選んでしまったのだ、と。



ーーー日本でも、自民党がいいとはおもわないが、野党が駄目だからなあ。






最新の画像もっと見る

コメントを投稿

ブログ作成者から承認されるまでコメントは反映されません。