The following is from the "last chapter" of the book below, which was recommended to me by a friend who is one of the country's best readers.
Every Japanese citizen should go to their local bookstore and get a subscription now.
It is a must-read for the people of the West, especially the American people.
Let me tell you about some of it as best I can.
The world's most urgent problems are out there.
I was enormously proud to learn that Tadanobu Bando is a native of Miyagi Prefecture.
He is the antithesis of Jun Azumi, Yuriko Ishigaki, and others. These very people are a disgrace to the toxicity and shame that Miyagi Prefecture has been spreading to Japanese society for the first time.
End of the chapter: It's not what you believe that will save you, it's the 'Sino-Japanese friendship' that will eat Japan
Tadanobu Bando
Six years ago, at the rally for the 25th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre in Ichigaya, people associated with China stood up one by one and recalled the commotion.
People associated with China stood up one by one to reminisce about the incident, some of them remembering their fallen comrades who were overrun by tanks. Some of them cheeks streamed endlessly down one's cheeks.
From the speeches of many of the orators on the stage, the hall's mood was that "China's democratization has taken a big step backward because of the Tiananmen Square incident," but I disagreed.
Even if China has become a democracy, it will not change.
It is because it is a country of Chinese people.
What the CCP wants to maintain is not communism but dictatorship, which is due to the Chinese people's national character. As long as China is now a nation of Chinese people, the social problems will not get better, no matter if a democratic government is established. And.
I threw that kind of argument, a rigid pitch to the Chinese democracy activists in the audience who could glimpse it from the stage.
It is a dead ball of discourse.
But at that time, a member of the Chinese Democratic Front for Democracy (an organization of Chinese democracy movements), who was present in the hall, contacted me later and said, "Thank you for saying it so bluntly, I felt the same way. I felt the same way." I received an e-mail thanking me.
There was also a follower of Falun Gong, and it was impressive that he agreed with me that 'Chinese people must change from their hearts.'
The Chinese themselves were aware of this.
But to speak out about it was a sympathetic social pressure that valued national self-esteem, and it was hard to make progress in spiritual reform.
It was mostly different ethnic groups that built successive dynasties in China.
During the Han dynasties, such as the Han and Ming dynasties, the country was in turmoil, the culture was out of date, the human spirit wearied, and it was the worst reign of all.
The current Xi Jinping regime is the worst Han regime, and because of its disproportionate power, its damage is not confined to the country. After the war, it ruled through the Inner Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party's purges and invaded the neighboring Uyghur and Tibet. Now it has caused various international problems with 18 bordering countries, including water supply and environmental pollution problems.
It includes Japan, of course, which, at the time I am writing, is considered to be in danger of being groomed by the collapse of the Three Gorges Dam, the world's largest dam.
If it collapses, not only will Shanghai be devastated, but the tide will carry contaminated water, drowned bodies, and garbage to the western part of Japan, where they will be washed ashore, followed by refugees.
Japan needs to recognize that the root of China's current problems lies in the evils of the one-party dictatorship and the national character of the modern Chinese people fostered by the one-party Chinese Communist Party.
The Wuhan virus scandal has left the world with too many scars.
The United States is expected to suffer more deaths than the combined death toll from the Korean and Vietnam wars, a stagnant economy, and more economic losses than the Lehman Shock.
It is only natural to demand some reckoning from China.
The U.S. Democratic Party, which has been sponging off China for the past half-century, has also changed its attitude.
It unanimously passed a bill banning Chinese companies, including Alibaba Group Holding and Baidu, from listing their shares on U.S. stock exchanges.
Moreover, Europe is rethinking its previous attitude toward China and is beginning to speak out and is furious.
A declaration of war, so to speak.
China's introduction of the National Security Law in Hong Kong prompted 27 countries, including Japan, the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States, to issue statements at the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland, on June 30, expressing concern about the implementation of the law.
There is no doubt that attitudes toward China have changed significantly.
In a sense, it is as if they have declared war on China.
However, China is somewhat reluctantly opening up and annexing reclaimed islands in the Nansha-Saisha region of the South China Sea and turning them into its territorial waters, repeatedly violating its territorial waters in the Taiwan Strait. Even in the East China Sea, the Chinese Maritime Bureau of Police' official ships has openly entered Senkaku Islands' vicinity. They have even chased around Japanese fishing vessels for three days.
The submarine has been brazenly bold that it has sailed over the edge of territorial waters or passed northeast of Amami Oshima Island in Kagoshima Prefecture while still underwater, prompting Japan to make an unprecedented public announcement that the submarine belongs to China.
As in the world of information, you don't usually let people know that you know what you know.
However, the Chinese have gone so far as to reveal our grasp of the situation, saying, "We know you are doing this," to warn them.
In response to Japan's detailed protests, Chinese Foreign Ministry official Zhao Lijian lied about the fishing boat's chasing, saying, "We only chased the boat away because it was in China's territorial waters.
In effect, they are waging war on Japan.
Japan is about to summon its ambassador, at the very least, but it has not responded.
At times, in connection with the four-nation statement, Kyodo News reported that 'the Japanese government was also approached about participating in the idea, but Japan refused.'
If I'm correct, this is no longer misinformation, but rather a lie.
I believe that it was China that directly or indirectly manipulated Kyodo News.
I think now is the time for Japan to make it's banner transparent. Still, the critical newspapers and media are even more foolish than the opposition party, talking only about "opposition to war," "Japan-China friendship," and "discussion."
The Japanese Constitution, a compendium of permanence that they revere, says: 'The Japanese Constitution states.
'We, the Japanese people, desire peace for all time and are deeply conscious of the high ideals controlling human relationships. We have determined to preserve our security and existence, trusting in the justice and faith of the world's peace-loving peoples. We desire to occupy an honored place in an international society striving to preserve peace and ban tyranny and slavery, oppression, and intolerance for all time from the earth. We recognize that all peoples of the world have the right to live in peace, free from fear and want.
Is China a country of "peace-loving peoples"?
If the people are so, at least its leadership does not have the people's voluntary and complimentary confidence.
A country that destroys the natural environment invades the territories of other countries, oppresses its own people, and influences international organizations to gain its own advantage, this time by spreading a new strain of Wuhan coronavirus and demanding their praise, is clearly outside the scope of the Constitution, given its preamble.
Therefore, even if one applies that leftist and doctrinaire interpretation to Article 9 of the Constitution, it is not even a country to which "the right of belligerency of the State shall not be recognized."
It is a country that must be prepared to wage a defensive war to protect its citizens' lives, property, and national interests.
It is necessary to provide information to deeply and multilaterally analyze, without taboos, that this country, composed of modern Chinese, is not worthy of friendship, at least at the present stage, and what the principles of their behavior are.
In order to do so, the realities of the situation must be reported more clearly.
Without that, mutual understanding is impossible, and that must be the first step toward finding clues to Japan-China friendship that will lead to mutual understanding.
As an investigator interpreter for the Metropolitan Police Department, I have interrogated about 1,400 Chinese nationals, a third of whom were criminals.
Some people have criticized Bando for being biased in his Chinese assessment because he has only looked at criminals, but this is not true.
Chinese people use their contacts and connections to find work and housing, so criminals' witnesses are also all Chinese. Some of them were a mixture of stowaways, but they often went about their everyday lives with a casual look.
They say that it is illegal when it comes to smuggling and illegal immigration but not a crime.
They have no big picture, objective or international view of the "dignity of the law" in other countries or the social chaos created by many people committing them.
It's not a problem for only himself - at least for people, right? And sometimes they don't even take offense there.
This draft continues.
