The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Honda Masakazu who tried to politically destroy Shinzo Abe.
Yasuo Hasebe selected as a third party committee of the Asahi Shimbun judging him, as promised with the Asahi newspaper, it made innocent of Honda.
With that services, he has posted a one - page constitutional theory in the Asahi Shimbun.
He says. "The constitution of Japan is a gift of the United States", "Careful even with the pressing Constitution".
The same Constitution Principles as the United States, so he also point out why do we change?
But the US law principle is to change without hesitation.
I wonder why it does not change why, not why change.
Its Hasebe told the National Assembly that the current security legislation "is unconstitutional as it changed interpretation without permission."
The US Constitution admits the interpretation of truth and contrary to the constitutionality of the death penalty.
Interpretation is done freely according to the actual situation.
Unreasonable China came out.
Will it follow the philosophy of the Constitution of the United States by interpreting it according to the actual situation?
Even so it is troubled in Hasebe.
It is kept in the Asahi Shimbun and talks about the constitutional theory convenient for the Asahi newspaper.
A law abuser is a word for him.
(July 16th issue of 2015)