The following is from the serial column of Masayuki Takayama, who brings the weekly Shincho released yesterday to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the postwar world.
It is a must-read not only for Japanese citizens but also for people around the world.
The emphasis in the text other than the headline is mine.
Hando has not a single redeeming quality.
Asahi, Mainichi, and Tokyo are called "the earthquake prediction federation of the newspaper world.
They have spent 400 billion yen over the past half-century and have failed to predict even one earthquake.
In Kumamoto, they failed to see even a magnitude seven aftershocks, resulting in the deaths of 276 people.
Instead, they have told many sinful lies.
Professor Hiroshi Sato of the University of Tokyo identified a concrete utility pole buried in the strata of Tachikawa as an active fault line and said that a major earthquake in Tokyo would hit tomorrow.
The people of Tokyo, where there are dozens of active faults all over the city, were very much alarmed.
Asahi, Mainichi, and Tokyo are no better than Professor Sato regarding lies.
Asahi's Tenseijingo repeated Seiji Yoshida's lie about sex slavery 16 times and had children copy it down.
One of the people who wrote the lie is the current editorial director, Seiki Nemoto.
If he knew his shame, he would stop being a newspaperman, but he is still pompously asking NHK and DHC TV if they have any sense of ethics.
The three newspapers have all written that Putin's invasion of Ukraine is "just like the Japanese military."
Putin unilaterally destroyed a weak country that could not retaliate, beat women and children to death, looted money and goods, and showed no remorse.
The three newspapers say that this is the same as the Japanese military, which "stopped the white invasion of Asia and put an end to colonialism and racism" (A. Toynbee).
There are indeed few scholars who would say such a foolish thing. Mainichi finally found one: Kazunari Hironaka, associate professor at Aichi-Gakuin University.
Tokyo quotes him as saying that "Japan invaded Manchuria, a Chinese territory, and established a puppet government," which is the same as Putin's recognition of Donbas independence.
Hironaka's premise is inimical to historical fact.
History tells us that Manchuria is the former land of the Manchu people and that the Chinese (Han Chinese) territory has always been inside the Great Wall of China. Manchuria is definitely not Chinese territory.
It was U.S. Secretary of State Stimson who flatly denied it. He is a man who has made his living hating Japan.
There is no basis for his claim; he decided that the Han Chinese would take over the Qing dynasty arbitrarily.
In this way, both Manchuria and Mongolia would become Chiang Kai-shek's territory, and the Japanese troops in Manchuria would be the invaders who "invaded Chinese territory arbitrarily."
Japan would henceforth be called the aggressor nation, while China gained vast territory from Ussuri to Mount Everest.
Stimson ordered Chiang Kai-shek to "strike Japan" in gratitude; historical events show this to be true.
Hironaka is just pandering to Beijing's "Qing's territory is mine" view of history.
Is he a Chinese envoy to China?
The Asahi Shimbun had Kiyotada Tsutsui, a professor at Teikyo University, speak about the "Japanese Army is Putin." Still, unfortunately, the story has become so convoluted that its meaning is no longer clear.
However, I am concerned about how he wrote, "Marco Polo Bridge Incident occurred, plunging Japan and China into the Sino-Japanese War.
It is a phrase that Kazutoshi Hando, who is now deceased, has always used, claiming that the Marco Polo Bridge Incident was the beginning of the Sino-Japanese quagmire war.
However, the Marco Polo Bridge incident did not start the war.
Three weeks later, the Tongzhou Incident occurred.
Chinese troops sealed off Tongzhou Castle, searched Japanese homes one by one, raped women, and massacred them. Two hundred and fifty people, including children, were killed.
A similar number were killed at the Alamo, but the Mexican army protected the women, children, and enslaved Black people. Still, the U.S. launched a war and took Texas, shouting, "Remember the Alamo.
But again, the Japanese held out.
Two weeks later, a 60,000-strong Chinese army attacked the Japanese concession in Shanghai.
The Chinese Air Force, trained by the United States and provided with actual aircraft, flew overhead.
With the support of the West, they tried to commit a massacre of the Japanese.
That is how Japan stood up.
It pushed back the superior Chinese forces and pursued Chiang Kai-shek, who had fallen into the hands of the United States.
In "Shoichi Watanabe's History of the Showa Period," he writes, "If the facts are written, the composition of the Japanese military invasion will collapse."
That is why Hando writes, "When the Sino-Japanese War broke out," without mentioning after the Marco Polo Bridge.
As if it were a natural phenomenon.
By the way, Iwanami's Kojien does not include the "Tongzhou Incident" out of consideration for China. The same is true of Asahi and Mainichi.
The incompetence of the Yochiren is forgivable.
I cannot forgive the newspapers and scholars who know the historical facts but misrepresent them.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the postwar world.
It is a must-read not only for Japanese citizens but also for people around the world.
The emphasis in the text other than the headline is mine.
Hando has not a single redeeming quality.
Asahi, Mainichi, and Tokyo are called "the earthquake prediction federation of the newspaper world.
They have spent 400 billion yen over the past half-century and have failed to predict even one earthquake.
In Kumamoto, they failed to see even a magnitude seven aftershocks, resulting in the deaths of 276 people.
Instead, they have told many sinful lies.
Professor Hiroshi Sato of the University of Tokyo identified a concrete utility pole buried in the strata of Tachikawa as an active fault line and said that a major earthquake in Tokyo would hit tomorrow.
The people of Tokyo, where there are dozens of active faults all over the city, were very much alarmed.
Asahi, Mainichi, and Tokyo are no better than Professor Sato regarding lies.
Asahi's Tenseijingo repeated Seiji Yoshida's lie about sex slavery 16 times and had children copy it down.
One of the people who wrote the lie is the current editorial director, Seiki Nemoto.
If he knew his shame, he would stop being a newspaperman, but he is still pompously asking NHK and DHC TV if they have any sense of ethics.
The three newspapers have all written that Putin's invasion of Ukraine is "just like the Japanese military."
Putin unilaterally destroyed a weak country that could not retaliate, beat women and children to death, looted money and goods, and showed no remorse.
The three newspapers say that this is the same as the Japanese military, which "stopped the white invasion of Asia and put an end to colonialism and racism" (A. Toynbee).
There are indeed few scholars who would say such a foolish thing. Mainichi finally found one: Kazunari Hironaka, associate professor at Aichi-Gakuin University.
Tokyo quotes him as saying that "Japan invaded Manchuria, a Chinese territory, and established a puppet government," which is the same as Putin's recognition of Donbas independence.
Hironaka's premise is inimical to historical fact.
History tells us that Manchuria is the former land of the Manchu people and that the Chinese (Han Chinese) territory has always been inside the Great Wall of China. Manchuria is definitely not Chinese territory.
It was U.S. Secretary of State Stimson who flatly denied it. He is a man who has made his living hating Japan.
There is no basis for his claim; he decided that the Han Chinese would take over the Qing dynasty arbitrarily.
In this way, both Manchuria and Mongolia would become Chiang Kai-shek's territory, and the Japanese troops in Manchuria would be the invaders who "invaded Chinese territory arbitrarily."
Japan would henceforth be called the aggressor nation, while China gained vast territory from Ussuri to Mount Everest.
Stimson ordered Chiang Kai-shek to "strike Japan" in gratitude; historical events show this to be true.
Hironaka is just pandering to Beijing's "Qing's territory is mine" view of history.
Is he a Chinese envoy to China?
The Asahi Shimbun had Kiyotada Tsutsui, a professor at Teikyo University, speak about the "Japanese Army is Putin." Still, unfortunately, the story has become so convoluted that its meaning is no longer clear.
However, I am concerned about how he wrote, "Marco Polo Bridge Incident occurred, plunging Japan and China into the Sino-Japanese War.
It is a phrase that Kazutoshi Hando, who is now deceased, has always used, claiming that the Marco Polo Bridge Incident was the beginning of the Sino-Japanese quagmire war.
However, the Marco Polo Bridge incident did not start the war.
Three weeks later, the Tongzhou Incident occurred.
Chinese troops sealed off Tongzhou Castle, searched Japanese homes one by one, raped women, and massacred them. Two hundred and fifty people, including children, were killed.
A similar number were killed at the Alamo, but the Mexican army protected the women, children, and enslaved Black people. Still, the U.S. launched a war and took Texas, shouting, "Remember the Alamo.
But again, the Japanese held out.
Two weeks later, a 60,000-strong Chinese army attacked the Japanese concession in Shanghai.
The Chinese Air Force, trained by the United States and provided with actual aircraft, flew overhead.
With the support of the West, they tried to commit a massacre of the Japanese.
That is how Japan stood up.
It pushed back the superior Chinese forces and pursued Chiang Kai-shek, who had fallen into the hands of the United States.
In "Shoichi Watanabe's History of the Showa Period," he writes, "If the facts are written, the composition of the Japanese military invasion will collapse."
That is why Hando writes, "When the Sino-Japanese War broke out," without mentioning after the Marco Polo Bridge.
As if it were a natural phenomenon.
By the way, Iwanami's Kojien does not include the "Tongzhou Incident" out of consideration for China. The same is true of Asahi and Mainichi.
The incompetence of the Yochiren is forgivable.
I cannot forgive the newspapers and scholars who know the historical facts but misrepresent them.
