"The timetable of the galaxy train"
2011/11/22
The forwarding fast charge secessionism
This place is strange. Sawa Akihiro
From the number of November of "WEDGE"
Yesterday, there was an article which did excitement to the article of "WEDGE" which was read in the train which heads for Kyoto when Akutagawa got my mind from a little while ago about thinking.
Sawa Akihiro Coming from Osaka Prefecture
The after-business-hours to be graduated in the departments of economic of Hitotsubashi University in 1981, same year enterd to Ministry of International Trade and Industry ( the present Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry )
Via the University of Tokyo Recerch center for adovance science and technology professor, it is incumbent than May, 2007.
NPO corporation international environment Economic Research Institute head of an office, too, serves.
The forwarding fast charge secessionism
This place is strange.
To do the becoming in the text of the black and * are Akutagawa.
The forwarding fast charge separation is the argument of the orbiting delay if seeing worldwide.
In addition to that the effect which was thought of wasn't gotten, the investment incentive to the new power and the transmission-network doesn't work and it is being possible for the head to suffer from the European and American various countries which moved forward liberalization and a forwarding fast charge separation.
Japan with more overwhelmingly low than the European and American various countries energy independence percentage carries forward a forwarding fast charge separation and does make supply of electric power more unstable and where is need which weakens resource procurement power?
The energy policy discussion in Japan which is made an introversion since nuclear accident is very dangerous.
Since the accident at the nuke of 1st of Fukushima, the forwarding power distribution secessionism recurs.
It doesn't find the reason well.
It is because the forwarding power distribution separation is the one the purpose of which is to promote competition for the power generation field to the presupposition in the existence of the surplus power generation equipment and is not the story as it argues under the conditions that the electricity shortage is worried about.
In the Europe and America, too, with the liberalization, the pushing off to the low-income group becomes a problem politically by electricity charge’s rising oppositely and the batting with the stable supply and the energy security, global warming measure becomes a problem.
If Japan tries to carry forward a forwarding power distribution separation in the orbiting delay, it is necessary to show a system design and a policy technique about how it solves these problems, being clear.
How does it do a surplus-capacity?
Often the property having to do with an infrastructure in case of service having to do with it and in case of it, the official facilities often participates about the final responsibility-of-power-supply in some form.
For example, as for the finance, the Bank of Japan exists as the last lender.
Therefore, the government possesses direct petroleum tank to petroleum and saves petroleum.
The electricity cannot be supplied steady-ly if the supply which is always commensurate with the demand isn't accomplished.
It is different from the communication that that it is difficult to connect when the traffic is complicated is permissible.
* As for the way of Masayoshi Son's doing, the fast charge worrying isn't current.
The frequency of the whole electric power system declines when the supply doesn't attain to the demand, the power plant can continue operation, the electricity passes away and results in the worst wide area power failure.
Even if there is too much supply compared with the demand, there is danger which destroys a transmission-network physically.
The government cannot shoulder a final responsibility-of-power-supply from the characteristic of the electricity which is called the contemporaneousness of such production and the consumption and then saving difficulty and imposes an obligation-to-supply on the power company by Electric Utility Industry Law.
As for the power company, the peak period can satisfy the demand and it must always have beforehand the surplus-capacity that the situation of the unexpectedness such as the trouble of the facilities and the sudden change of the thunderbolt pivot, too, can be corresponded to only but it oppresses profit.
*It is the capitalism in the 20th century that doesn't make investment to oppress profit and is in the fact which is needless to say.
That the large-scale power failure occurs frequently in the various countries which adopt such a way is consequential.
It is to execute a final supply responsibility in the mortgage that an account was guaranteed by the monopoly, the rate regulation - the total cost method ( the legally in the form to have given the reasonable profit a lift in the production cost rated method ).
If supposing that the monopoly distorted the constitution of the power company, to think of the rule bill for the correction is consequential but it doesn't mean a forwarding power distribution separation at once.
...The omission
The forwarding power distribution secessionism and the liberalization argument in the present Japan are the argument of the orbiting delay if saying in the world.
The being of it of saying that the liberalization model gets not to fit a rather modernistic policy purpose in that the political problem which is peculiar to the energy field which doesn't divide surfaces only in the cost performance such as the energy security and global warming measure is done actuality in the world and it is common sense.
Since nuclear accident, the energy policy discussion in Japan which is made an idea with introversion is in the very much political and very dangerous condition.