not a kind of false report, but it can be said that it is a vicious anti-Japanese terrorism

There is a section in charge with Misako Takahashi, but why did she not check it and point out a lie? Re-send the chapter sent to 2018-10-22 with the title.
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
Lie articles seen in poison gas weapon coverage
After the previous war, the Japanese forces surrendered, disarmed and handed over all weapons to the Allied forces.
The same is true for the Chinese continent.
A document has been found.
The materials excavated by Masanori Mizuma in 2007 and confirmed by the Ministry of Defense include: 'We handed out tear bombs to China army lieutenant · Chen Yong-Lu in Shanghai,' the same is true for the Siberian Museum in Yamagata Prefecture, 'we handed over weapons to the Allied forces on the Chinese mainland', the document has been found.
Nevertheless, the Mainichi Shimbun will post an article such as 'The suit against the Tokyo District Court for the 44 casualties of Chinese soldiers killed by poisonous gas weapons that the Japanese army abandoned in Qiqihar.'
It is neither poison gas nor abandonment.
The Asahi Shimbun and the Mainichi Shimbun responded to these groundless Chinese people's complaints and eventually sent out 60 trillion yen to the disposal of toxic gas weapons from the Japanese government, that is, the Japanese blood tax to China.
While knowing that it is a lie, make an intentional report.
It is not a kind of false report, but it can be said that it is a vicious anti-Japanese terrorism act in the name of the press.
Such vicious poisons are hidden in columns that are likely to smile.
An interview with Keiko Ochiai who appeared in the Asahi Shimbun last month is one of them.
She's from the personality of Nippon Cultural Broadcasting, who has a nickname of Lemon.
She sold her cuteness, and when it was wither, she quickly turned to 'Weekly Friday.'
The role is stupid baby boom generation elder sister.
So she talks about anti-war peace, anti-nuclear, anti-nuclear power plant.
It does not need any thoughts, if it repeats the same thing to be allowed as a progressive culture person
The same is true for this interview. Talk about love, say anti-war and peace.
Fifty years, continue the same line without change. It's easy going.
It leads to the big false reports of Yoshida Seiji
However, there was such a stupid inside.
"The public at that time (junior high school, high school) was required to submit a family register" "Mother searched for a school that is not so"
For a moment, I wondered if she grew up to be a smuggling immigrant without a family register, or a family that fakes her birthplace like Lien-Fang, but it is said that she was a so-called 'child of mistress' I remembered.
At that time, the children of mistress of 'On a pine seen over a refined black wall' were quite not a few to public schools.
That was not a problem.
However, she said, 'Public schools had to submit family register.'
Then her father and her surname are different, it comes to light with the child of mistress.
Well, it continues, saying her mother was troubled and made her enter a private school.
But this is strange.
It can understand it by a little research.
At that time, even now, to enter the public, you only need to submit a resident card that shows the school district.
The reason why the illegal Chinese who have illegally entered the country are giving children to school is because there was no such examination in Japan.
Why does she say such a transparent lie?
There is a section in charge with Misako Takahashi, but why did she not check it and point out a lie?
Also, deskman to take charge of, too, usually thinks that it is odd.
If we think, it will be about to make it examine, pointing out.
In the Asahi Shimbun, they did not work to collect evidence since Yoshida Seiji.
So doing a big false report Kimura Tadakazu resigned as president.
Today's Masataka Watanabe vows to God and says to collect evidence.
But this time, both reporters and deskman passed the lie of Keiko Ochiai without doing to collect evidence.
This manuscript continues.