If this is left as it is, it will be impossible for this country to become advanced. It will not be advanced; it will be backward. The culture of lies, politics, academia, and courts will lead this country to ruin.
July 30, 2019
It is a natural consequence that Asahi Shimbun is a newspaper company that has been sending students to these Korean universities to study in-house when, in reality, it is more correct to say that they are traitors and national pirates.
It would be more accurate to say that they are people who don't understand anything when they decide to study in Korea.
The following is what I wrote in my June 2017 article titled "I was surprised that he was a professor at Ritsumeikan University, but I was even more surprised and dismayed that his number one disciple is Tetsuya Hakoda.
Preamble omitted.
Wakamiya Yoshibumi (who even served as chief editorial writer!) ), Haruhito Kiyota, Takashi Uemura, Tetsuya Hakoda, and others have studied in-house at Yonsei University.
It is no exaggeration to say that Alexis Dadden is the epitome of low-mindedness and evil (the stupidity and narrow-mindedness of her warped ideology are evident in her facial expression).
These women organized the Women's International War Crimes Tribunal on Japan's Military Sexual Slavery.
(December 7-12, 2000).
The fact that this queen of Korean-originated anti-Japanese propaganda in the U.S. is a college professor is also truly appalling...
It was a long time before the world knew that she was a testament to the arrogance and stupidity of professors.
She studied at Yonsei University.
That is why I immediately realized that Yonsei University is an anti-Japanese university.
Yonsei University is the home of anti-Japanese propaganda and one of the darkest corners of the KCIA.
Postscript
*In view of the fact that Professor Lee pointed out, it is not such a big deal, but all of Korea's universities were made up of anti-Japanese propaganda.
The stupidity of the Asahi Shimbun, the Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, and others who have continued to support such a country (although some in the LDP, such as Shigeru Ishiba, are quite stupid) is also genuinely extreme.
The following is a list of the world's leading Koreans.
The following is from a series of articles by Tsutomu Nishioka, one of the world's leading experts on the Korean Peninsula, in the monthly magazine WiLL, which went on sale on March 26.
The title of this month's issue is "Why Koreans Lie."
It is a must-read article not only for Japanese citizens but for people around the world.
The other day, I was critical of Hashimoto Toru, a lawyer who belongs to the Japan Federation of Bar Associations, a den of anti-Japanese leftists, raising his voice about Japan and South Korea in a loud and outrageous manner during a program on the preliminary results of the vote counting.
I was also convinced that he would not be capable of holding national office if things continued as they are now.
It is a paper that people like him need to read carefully.
Preamble omitted.
Korean Universities are Factories of Lies
Meanwhile, well-meaning scholars are engaged in a fierce battle of words in South Korea.
I am writing this article in Seoul, Korea.
It is because Professor Lee Young-hoon and his colleagues, who represent a group of well-meaning academics who have been severe critics of anti-Japanese sentiment in South Korea, have published a book that summarizes their arguments in an easy-to-understand manner, entitled "The Root of the Korean Crisis: Anti-Japanese Tribalism," and held a book launch on July 17.
Professor Lee explained why he used the unfamiliar term "anti-Japanese tribalism" instead of "anti-Japanese nationalism" in his book.
"Korean nationalism can be classified as the nationalism that emerged in the West. Korean nationalism does not have the category of free and independent individuals. The Korean nation is itself a group, an authority, and a status. Therefore, it is more correct to call it a tribe."
He then offers the following bone-chilling self-criticism: "Korean historiography is a hotbed of lies, and because of such education, Koreans have come to tell lies all the time. The most significant responsibility lies with the lying academics in this country. The people of this country have made lying a daily routine, and the politicians have made it a means of political contestation. History and sociology in this country are hotbeds of lies. The universities in this country are factories of lies. I am proud to say that it is not a big mistake to say so. It has been that way for 60 years, since the 1960s. That is why, in the 2000s, everyone, including politicians, has come to lie with impunity."
He then lists the lies in his field of study, Korean history.
He then lists the lies in his field of study in Korean historiography: "From ancient history to modern history, the list of lies in Korean historiography is endless.
Lying has been rampant in the history of Japanese domination of the region since the turn of the 20th century.
Here are just a few of the lies refuted in this book.
Textbooks claim that the Governor-General took 40% of the nation's land as state property through a land survey project, which is false.
The textbooks' claim that rice from colonial Korea was shipped out to Japan was the product of ignorance.
The claim that the Japanese Imperialists mobilized Koreans as laborers and abused them as enslaved people during the war was a malicious fabrication.
The march of lies culminated in the issue of Japanese comfort women.
The common belief that military police and police abducted virgins from the streets or took women from laundry rooms and dragged them to comfort stations was a blatant lie, of which not a single case has been found.
After criticizing the study of history to this point, he thoroughly criticizes the Supreme Court's decision on wartime workers' compensation last October, saying that the lies have spread to the courts.
He said, "It has already been 60 years since the study of lies wrote false history and taught it to the younger generation. The generation that grew up with that education finally became Supreme Court justices. It is not so strange that the judiciary of this country is trying to make false judgments since the generation that was raised with such education has finally become the Supreme Court justices.
The Neglect of the Supreme Court Justices
I want to introduce the central part of Professor Lee's criticism of the ruling, which is a bit long but relates to the cause of the current deterioration of relations between Japan and Korea.
"Let's talk about the Supreme Court's ruling at the end of October 2018 that Nippon Steel, which took over the company, must pay 100 million won each to four people who worked for Nippon Steel before it was liberated (from Japanese rule).
The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit almost 20 years ago, and I believe that they were the ones who initially went to Japan to file the lawsuit.
Despite repeated defeats, the persistence with which they ultimately won is a great feat.
What is the substance of this persistence?
Anyway, the Supreme Court ruled that the Koreans were mobilized to Japan for the war of aggression based on the premise that Japan's rule of Korea was illegitimate and that they were overworked as enslaved people without being paid a decent monthly wage.
The text of the Supreme Court's decision begins with a description of the "basic facts" of the case.
After reading that section, my impression was, in a word, "This is a lie."
I am not going to argue the law of the decision.
I am not a lawyer.
I have only one focus in my judgment.
That 'basic factual situation' is not valid or likely a lie.
The Supreme Court did not examine whether the plaintiffs' allegations were true.
I find no trace of such in the decision text.
I would ask our nation's high and mighty Supreme Court justices.
Can a trial be valid if it does not verify a potentially false claim?"
Two of the four plaintiffs were recruited in September 1943 to work as trainee laborers at the company's Osaka steel mill.
Nippon Steel forced them to save a large portion of their monthly wages and had a dormitory prefect keep their bank books and seals, but the prefect did not return the money until the end.
It is the essential nature of the damage the plaintiffs claim to have suffered.
As a historian, I am familiar with this fact.
I have heard similar cases from many people.
As the court decision suggests, the two plaintiffs were most likely minors at the time.
The prefects were not employees of Nippon Steel but masters of the kitchens and dormitories where laborers were grouped. They were most likely Koreans.
They were usually Koreans.
The reason is that only then could they communicate with each other and control the situation.
The prefect later returned to Wonsan with the plaintiff.
This fact supports the following presumption.
The prefect may have been the guardian or protector of the plaintiff who accompanied him from the time of his departure.
My argument is as follows.
The allegation that NIHON STEEL did not pay wages to the plaintiffs is not established.
The judgment itself, which refers to forced savings, establishes that point.
The prefects would be the culprits if the wages were not conveyed to the plaintiffs.
Therefore, it is impossible to know if the prefect did so without questioning the prefect.
The prefect may have sent monthly wages to the plaintiff's parents' house on behalf of the minor plaintiff.
In short, the case is a civil case between the plaintiff and the prefect.
These are my findings after reading the judgment.
However, did the Supreme Court summon the prefect to investigate?
The prefect should have died long ago.
If so, does the case stand?
Let me clarify my argument.
I am not denying the plaintiff's allegations; rather, I cannot confirm whether they are true or not.
It is the truth.
The Korean Supreme Court held Nippon Steel responsible for the deaths even though we only know this much about the facts.
Supreme Court justices are not historians.
They are merely jurists who know nothing about the realities of the wartime period.
If that were the case, they would have to call relevant experts and hear reference testimony.
However, they were so ignorant of the reality of the time that they did not even feel the need to do so.
They did not doubt the plaintiff's claims, which were likely lies.
They, too, had been taught to lie from an early age.
I am struck by the conscience and courage of Professor Lee, who has made such a calm and factual criticism of the anti-Japanese court decision, using his name in the arena of public discourse.
The 18,000 copies of "Anti-Japanese Speciesism," which Lee and his colleagues wrote with the desperate belief that the nation would perish if it did not fight the lies, sold out within ten days of its release, and an additional 10,000 copies are being printed.
Professor Lee explained his tragic motivation for writing "Anti-Japanese Tribalism" as follows.
He explained his tragic motivation for writing the book: "It is because of anti-Japanese tribalism that all kinds of lies are created and spread. If this is allowed to continue, it will be impossible for this country to become advanced. It will not be advanced; it will be backward. The culture, politics, academia, and courts of lies will lead this country to ruin. This book is my all-consuming, anti-Japanese tribalism, its rush into the huge cultural power camp."
Anti-Japanese Speciesism," which Prof. Lee and others wrote with the desperate belief that the nation would perish if it did not fight the lies, sold out 18,000 copies within ten days of its release, and an additional 10,000 copies are being printed.
We will continue to watch to see if the battle between Lee and others in this kind of discourse will change Korean society.
This article continues.
2024/6/4 in Kanazawa
