Because serving as the guide in the committee is Takagi Kenichi lawyer, they will have written the contents of this testimony, too.
If trying to search something, following Ikeda Nobuo Blog appeared.
The part of *-* is me.
The fiction that "the testimony" of the previous comfort woman was led to the lawyer.
The pit of the comfort woman problem is that the testimony of the comfort woman who should be able to trust as "the testimony of the party" is roughly distorted (in the induction of the lawyer and so on) primarily.
For example, North Korea's testimony of former comfort women that Chung Okusun that has been endlessly cited in Coomaraswamy report is something like the following.
"At the age of 13 of June of [1933] the day, so I had to prepare lunch for parents to work in the fields, it went to the drawing water at the well in the village. Then attacked by a garrison of Japanese, and I was taken.
As for the parents, they did not know at all what happened to the daughter. It was taken to the police station in the track and a rape was done there by a few policeman.
It was about 10 days and I was taken to the garrison of Japanese Army in Hyesan.
There were about 400 girls of the Korean like me there and every day, they were worked as the sexual slave for the Japanese soldier who exceeds 5000.
Even 40 people in one day I dealt with.
It was beaten when protest each time and it was thrust into the mouth in the rag."
For Mr. Ikuhiko Hata to comment this, it is identical with the testimony of the previous comfort woman, Re-Pokunyo whom North Korea labor newspaper told in 1992.
The Labor Party in North Korea seems to copy the same fiction and to be making more than one person testify.
Because it finds that this is not the story of the party, in Korean Peninsula at the time of 1933, the place of the consolation of the army is because it was not.
Saying that there was "400 girls" in the barrack, too, is absurd.
The consolation place was at most tens of persons, being out of the barrack.
If 400 people of the comfort women dealt with "40 person per day." 16,000 people every day.
5000 soldiers so that was also sex three or more times each day.
All testimony of the previous comfort woman whom the Coomaraswamy committee adopted is such a fiction.
Because serving as the guide in the committee is Takagi Kenichi lawyer, they will have written the contents of this testimony, too.
* This lawyer is the husband of Mizuho Fukushima. Actually they are with the wife following the lead set by her husband, to perform the activities of the traitor itself, to give a havoc in Japan, because it hurt the honor and the credit of Japan, the past and the present Japanese people, in the way of the rascal, as for the honest people, anyone will be stunned.*
If saying by the trial, there is not evidential capacity in the one to have adopted only the claim of the plaintiff without the cross-examining.
As for coming out by the hearing of Kono talk, too, in addition that the content of the story of such a story doesn't agree with the historical fact, the story of the same previous comfort woman is backtracking repeatedly.
There is no documentation to support it.
In the first place, because the previous comfort woman cannot prove that the direction of the army exists, even if it hears the story of much them, "the compulsion taking" cannot be proved.
The tear-jerking article of Asahi Shimbun and NYT and so on and the judgment at "the woman international war criminal tribunal" which was introduced by this week the e-mail magazine are a common point, being completely written only in the personal narrative of the previous comfort woman.
As Asahi Shimbun, too, admitted the official document which supports it, in the ex-colony, one sheet isn't found out.
