The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
When talking to someone, when I am saying to him, The Asahi Shimbun painted the Japanese face with mud, but his answer is, It's not mud, it is feces, those guys painted feces to the faces of the Japanese from ancestors to descendants.
I certainly think that the expression is more accurate.
The Asahi Shimbun himself withdrew Yoshida Seiji testimony, but until the cancellation of the article, it apologized only to the reader only to the last, for the whole Japanese that they disgrace by their report, they apologize for nothing.
On the contrary, the problem of comfort women is a problem of women's human rights and they are diverting the issue.
Defenders of the Asahi Shimbun are also in chorus, The comfort women problem has not disappeared, It is historical revisionism, they are doing battle outrageously with, the thing they should understand is the weight of "shame".
The word "historical revisionism" is used to bind Japanese who want to leave the Tokyo trial historical view at the last resort for the forces that want to preserve post war regime - America, China, Russia, Korea, and the Asahi newspaper - it will.
Regarding this historical revisionism, I wrote in detail in this month's Spring of Late Wells, but the Asahi Shimbun that is not ashamed of defying his country with the logic of such label pasting is really incorrigible.
Regarding this concept of "shame", Asahi himself as well as Asahi's defenders also, they do not mention one word, I think it is very abnormal.
The Asahi Shimbun should apologize seriously to Japanese people and have to wipe out the disgrace of Japan against the world.
This draft continues.
