There may be many people who think that it would be useless to do such a thing, but there

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Use MacArthur testimony

There may be many people who think that it would be useless to do such a thing, but there are winnings.

That is the Tokyo trial itself, MacArthur is at the official place - the US Senate Military Diplomatic Joint Committee - who has already testified in 1951 to deny the Tokyo trial.

This is not a study by academics, MacArthur's diary or book, it is a testimony in the official place.

I already quoted a couple of times already so it may be said that it is still, but I want to quote it daringly.

Their (Japanese people's) purpose, therefore, in going to war was largely dictated by security.

(Therefore, the purpose for which they entered the war was forced primarily for security)

MacArthur is the highest and biggest Revisionist on the Great East Asian War.

Speaking from the main point, he is saying the same thing as Tojo's affidavit.

It seems that Americans and the "New York Times" do not know about this.

I do not think that Japanese Foreign Ministry knows it.

The Abe administration should promote the Revisionist movement in Japan using MacArthur testimony at a budget to make warships.

Without the success of this movement, Japan must remain a loser of history war forever.

I have heard that no international law scholars recognize this as a legal trial.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Who will bind Japan?

This proposal was natural for historical reasons.

But as soon as this historical reflection of reflection, that is to say the revisionistic history, began to appear, Germany became a world of Hitler.

That is why the legitimate academic effort of reviewing World War it was illusion like Hitler's cheering, and the historians who were seen as Revisionist became socially buried.

This trend continued even after the Second World War, and Revisionist came to be regarded as Neo-Nazi. In other words, this word became the most "dirty word".

What is said to be Revisionist is becoming more socially considered as an outlaw.

Japan is bound by this word now.

Talking about something that denies the Prosecution clause of prosecutors of Tokyo Trial - even if it is legitimate, the Allied Powers who judged Japan brand the revisionist.

Especially America, especially "New York Times" likes this branding.

Besides, Russia, China, South Korea and Asahi Shimbun are also in sync.

It is too cautious that Prime Minister Abe is more timid than the time of the first cabinet, I guess that it seems to be wary of being stamped this branding.

The country that is trying to impress this mark on Japan is the country that was profitable in the defeat of Japan, that is, "Defeated gains country".

However, Tokyo trials are unjustifiable from wherever they are, I have heard that no international law scholars recognize this as a legal trial.

(The exception is also called Japanese Professor Yokota Kisaburo, University of Tokyo).

All the Japanese must become a Revisionist.

This draft continues.

Originally this word was used at the time of the fight of the church in the UK in the latter part of

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The label of "Revisionist"

Originally this word was used at the time of the fight of the church in the UK in the latter part of the 19th century, but in general it became famous among Marxists who rose before and after the First World War, it is a term to criticize the hostile group.　

I am remembering that the term "revisionism" was used as a term for the Communist Party to criticize the Democratic Party and others.

I think that in the 1960s Moscow and Beijing were used as words to critic communists who do not comply with decisions.

At this time, the experienced person who actually received criticism will still be alive.

But what we relate to today is the word Revisionist which is used in places that are neither church relations nor communist relations.

This became a term criticizing historians in the United States.

The United States joined the First World War and put out numerous casualties.

However, when it looked back, the purpose of participating in the war was not urgent, and the national interest that it could see was not clear despite many casualties.

From the regret feeling that the responsibility of the World War I to blame only for Germany, rather that the responsibility of the Poincare cabinet in France was more responsible for the review of history (revision, revise), there were historians who advocated them.

This draft continues.

If you piggy on this, it is clear that both Russia and China will get benefits.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Intention of "anti-Japan victory memorial"

In "History War" there are two more difficulties.

One is Russia (Soviet Union) and the other is China.

Russia declared war on Japan without permission before the neutral treaty expired and took territory, this year, Russia became overwhelmed by Japan's Northern Territories issue, it babbles like this.

"What Japan insists on the Northern Territories will deny the significance, framework and achievements of the last great war," it said.

In other words, the previous war is equivalent to claiming that the battle of "country of democracy vs. fascist countries" is in accordance with war propaganda of Allies.

And Russia of the Soviet era was also a country of democracy (Be ridicule!), insisting that the invasion of the peace treaty infringement and occupation is also the fruit of the war of justice.

China ‥ also unabashedly, this year celebrates the year of the 70th anniversary of the victory of anti-Japanese warfare.

I understand what you want to say, but it is ridiculous to me and others who know somewhat about the Sina incident (later Nikka incident).

At that time the Japanese army’s 1st Battalion was able to overcome the one Division of the Chinese army, that is, the Japanese army was said to be able to win even one - tenth of the enemy.

(Particularly in the Manchurian Incident, the Kwantung Army, which is one division that the Japanese army of over 10,000 people drove out the 250,000 Chinese soldiers from Manchuria).

Apart from the exact figures, the Japanese army was strong in far and away the best.

Moreover, it was Chiang Kai - shek’s National Government Army, and it was not Mao Zedong’s army, that is, the Chinese Communist Party’s army.

At that time the Chinese Communist Army etc. was small and sometimes came out with guerrilla level, but it was being purged every time.

The reason that the Japanese army left the continent was not lost to the Sina soldiers, because he lost to the United States. However, although Chiang Kai-shek did not fall out from the Allied Army, it may be said to be "victory", but it is a story of the national government, the Communist government which was the enemy of its national government said that steal someone's thunder it is.

The reason why Russia and China are going to celebrate directed at Japan that Japan was defeated by the Japan - US War in essence.

It is consistent with the intention of the United States trying to keep Japan down.

It is a consistent policy of the United States to continue keeping Japan in a depressed state.

If you piggy on this, it is clear that both Russia and China will get benefits.

What is making this piggy possible?

It is the word "Revisionist" that is said recently.

This draft continues.

After World War II, how many Japanese businessmen are in Korea have their fingers burnt

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

After World War II, how many Japanese businessmen are in Korea have their fingers burnt.

Even people living in the center of the study like me, heard such stories directly and directly.

That's why it does not need to wage war with neighboring countries.

But diplomatic breaks are impossible, should there be a basic policy of the country to make commerce · trade etc. relations as dilute as possible?

There are companies that make money by trading with Korea, but I think that it would be good for the government to instruct them to quit as much as possible.

It will be a basic policy to prevent Japanese anti-Korean emotions and emotional sentiment from increasing further.

In other words, Japan is "a relaxed relationship like water" with Korea, returning to a relationship close to the Edo period. With the people of the mainland of the Sina in mind, there are said about 2,400 years ago and are thought to be applicable today as well.

That is, A man of virtue intersection is faint and like water, Small-minded person's association is sweet and like sweet sake, A man of virtue is made faint and familiar, Small-minded person gets sweet and disappears (Zhuang Zhou outer chapters · the Mountain wood twenty)

It is sweet, in other words, because it is profits are involved and be all over, instead they will get tied up with each other.

Let us make a relationship of a man of virtue with Koreans.

Let's not talk about sweet tales, profitable stories and economic talks.

It is useless for Korea to do anything already, the Japanese should prepare ourselves for the worst.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

Voices saying that the annexation era with Japan was "a good age", I heard it often from Korean people, I also know that there are Koreans writing so.

However, after the Japanese have withdrawn, as time passes since becoming independent virtually under the American occupation forces, anti-Japanese movement seems to be getting extreme.

This is probably due to the fact that ordinary people who know about the annexation era with Japan began to die out.

It is an anti-Japanese, but want to rely on Japan.

Oh Sonfa Professor at Takushoku University critically looked at the Korean anti-Japanese, but only once said that "This would make Korea feel the sense of obligation to Japan".

It was the time of the Asian currency crisis.

At that time, South Korea needs the default, it was helped by Japan.

At that time, I have a memory that I told Oh Sonfa something like "Is not it such a thing?"

Looking at Korea's attitude towards Japan after that, it seems that I was right.

Even at Oh who severely criticized the homeland - at that time - about 18 years ago - it would have been watching the mother country better now.

Japan-Korea relations are indifferent

It is useless for Korea to do anything already, the Japanese should prepare ourselves for the worst.

This draft continues.

We cannot speak properly to the country which has dragged the tradition of historical description

The other day a friend who read the Takayama Masayuki's serialization column in the monthly magazine Sound Argument this month's issue, immediately went to the bookstore to subscribe to the following books.

I borrowed today because I was eagerly reading today, but this book is also a book all Japanese citizens have to head to subscribing to the nearest bookstore. It is exactly the same for people all over the world, but somehow, I will tell the part as much as I can.

First edition of June 7, 2017. WAC Inc. 1700 yen.

Watanabe Shoichi, "Spring of knowledge"

The following is from the cover of this book.

Memorial publication, "Knowledge giant", last message

A rare scholar, Essay of a gem

- The consistency of the history memorized in the future Japanese will be the source of patriotism under consciousness and will be the source of pride as a citizen and the prosperity of the country. (From the text)

Revisionist · MacArthur

Korea's History Recognition

Since around last year (2014), the word "history war" came to be used frequently.

Because it is "war", the attacking side and the defending side come out. And Japan is a one-sided defense, and its defense seems not to be very successful. Korea is telling Japan what it means to "look good at history".

In recent years, especially the "military" comfort women issue has been brought violently. It is building even a comfort woman image in the United States.

There was a report that is still about to bring it to the summit talks.

Even after it became clear that this issue originated in the article, speaking easily slang, "fake article", an article like a mixture of misinformation and fabrication of the Asahi Newspaper, it was reported that is still about to bring it to the summit talks.

We cannot speak properly to the country which has dragged the tradition of historical description that "history" is not related to "historical fact" to the present.

"There is no choice but to thrust out," people have been working on Korean issues for a long time. I would like to agree with this.

Korea is sure to say that it does not exist, Japan-Korea Basic Treaty (1965), which established to take that much time.

The representative of the Korean side is the father of the current president [Park Geun-hye].

He knows well because he experienced the Japanese army.

That he did not matter about comfort women in negotiations with Japan.

The fact that his daughter who does not know about that time is having a big problem itself is strange.

Even in the Takeshima issue, Korea occupies illegal occupation without having enough historical materials to submit to the international mediation trial (Japan has a lot of information showing that it was a Japanese territory since the Edo period).

This draft continues.

De cette façon, son argumentation et sa conscience sont fondées sur des faits faux non fondés.

Voici la suite du chapitre précédent.

Les arguments et les problèmes de Kay

L'argument de M. Kay est largement divisé en 5 points, 8 éléments.

Premièrement, «l'indépendance des médias».

M. Kay passe en revue l'article 4 de la Loi sur la radiodiffusion et cherche à obtenir l'élimination.

Le règlement sur la diffusion devrait être laissé à l'établissement indépendant du pays et il est nécessaire de créer un cadre pour ces institutions.

Et la seconde, il convient d'accorder une attention particulière au soutien des médias qui traitent de questions telles que les activités militaires américaines à Okinawa, l'impact des centrales nucléaires et les catastrophes.

La seconde est «l'éducation à l'histoire et l'intervention dans la presse».

Il ne devrait pas intervenir dans l'interprétation des problèmes historiques pour le matériel d'enseignement scolaire, mais il est important que les efforts visant à informer le public des crimes graves en accordant une attention particulière aux événements impliqués au Japon en temps de guerre et le gouvernement appelle à un soutien.

Rapporteur spécial pour visiter "le droit à la vérité" afin de vérifier l'information publique sur les violations graves des droits de l'homme, y compris la question du réconfort des femmes qu'il demande.

Le troisième intitulé «Campagne électorale et démo», afin d'éliminer la disposition sur les «restrictions déséquilibrées sur les campagnes politiques» dans la Loi électorale publique afin de rendre la loi électorale conforme au droit international des droits de l'homme.

Okinawa, l'agence d'application de la loi a fait tous les efforts pour faire respecter les manifestations et les entretiens sans peine de déséquilibre imposée aux gens, la liberté d'exprimer l'opposition n'est pas violée, il nous demande de le faire.

Ce qui suit se rapporte à la Loi sur la protection civile spécifique, en vertu de cette loi, la loi devrait être révisée non pas à la réduction des médias, les médias et les fonctionnaires sont également punis pour la divulgation d'informations pour un intérêt public qui ne met pas en danger la sécurité nationale Il existe une règle d'exception Qu'il n'y a rien, et l'application de cette loi exhorte à créer une institution indépendante de suivi.

Les relations suivantes à la Loi sur la protection des secrets spécifiques, la loi devrait être révisée pour rétrécir les médias, les médias et les fonctionnaires ne sont pas punis pour la divulgation d'informations pour un intérêt public qui ne met pas en danger la sécurité nationale pour établir des règles d'exception et l'application de cette La loi instaure la création d'une institution indépendante de surveillance.

Et enfin, nous devrions adopter une loi antidiscriminatoire qui peut être largement appliquée à la «discrimination et au discours haineux».

De cette façon, son argumentation et sa conscience sont fondées sur des faits faux non fondés.

Je veux douter même si quelqu'un le souffle.

Ce projet se poursuit.

De esta manera su argumento y su conciencia se basan en hechos erróneos infundados.

Lo que sigue es la continuación del capítulo anterior.

Los argumentos y problemas de Kay

El argumento del Sr. Kay se dividió en gran medida en 5 puntos, 8 puntos.

En primer lugar, la "independencia de los medios de comunicación".

El Sr. Kay revisa el Artículo 4 de la Ley de Radiodifusión y está buscando su eliminación.

La reglamentación de la radiodifusión debe dejarse a la institución independiente del país, y busca que sea necesario crear un marco para esas instituciones.

Y la segunda es que se debe prestar atención al apoyo a los medios que cubren temas como las actividades militares de los Estados Unidos en Okinawa, el impacto de las centrales nucleares y los desastres.

La segunda es "la educación histórica y la intervención en la prensa".

No debe intervenir en la interpretación de los problemas históricos de los materiales de enseñanza de la escuela, pero es importante que los esfuerzos para informar al público de los crímenes graves, prestando atención a los acontecimientos involucrados en Japón durante la guerra, y el gobierno está pidiendo apoyo.

Relator Especial para visitar "el derecho a la verdad" con el fin de verificar la información pública sobre violaciones graves de los derechos humanos, incluida la cuestión de la mujer de confort que está pidiendo.

El tercero titulado "Campaña Electoral y Demostración", para eliminar la disposición de "restricciones desequilibradas a la campaña política" en la Ley de Elecciones Públicas para hacer que la ley electoral cumpla con la ley internacional de derechos humanos.

Okinawa, la agencia de aplicación de la ley ha hecho todos los esfuerzos para hacer cumplir las protestas y las entrevistas sin el desequilibrio castigo impuesto a la gente, la libertad de expresar la oposición no se viola nos pide que lo hagamos.

Lo siguiente se refiere a la Ley de Protección Secreta Específica, en virtud de esta ley, la ley debe ser revisada no a la contracción de los medios de comunicación, los medios de comunicación y funcionarios públicos también son castigados por la divulgación de información de interés público que no pone en peligro la seguridad nacional Existe una regla de excepción Que no hay nada, y la aplicación de esta ley insta al establecimiento de una institución de control independiente.

Las siguientes relaciones con la Ley de Protección Secreta Específica, la ley debe ser revisada a la contracción de los medios de comunicación, los medios de comunicación y los funcionarios públicos también no son castigados por divulgación de información de interés público que no pone en peligro la seguridad nacional para establecer normas de excepción, Insta al establecimiento de una institución de control independiente.

Y, por último, deberíamos introducir una ley antidiscriminatoria que pueda aplicarse ampliamente a la "discriminación y al odio".

De esta manera su argumento y su conciencia se basan en hechos erróneos infundados.

Quiero dudar incluso si alguien lo está soplando.

Este proyecto continúa.

Auf diese Weise basiert sein Argument und sein Bewusstsein auf unbegründeten falschen

Das folgende ist die Fortsetzung des vorherigen Kapitels.

Kays Argumente und Probleme

Mr. Kays Argument weitgehend in 5 Punkte, 8 Items.

Erstens "Unabhängigkeit der Medien".

Herr Kay überprüft den Artikel 4 des Rundfunkgesetzes und sucht die Beseitigung.

Die Verordnungen über die Sendung sollten dem vom Land unabhängigen Institution überlassen werden, und es ist zu prüfen, dass es notwendig ist, einen Rahmen für solche Institutionen zu schaffen.

Und die zweite ist, dass die Aufmerksamkeit auf die Unterstützung von Medien gelegt werden sollte, die Themen wie US-Militär-Aktivitäten in Okinawa, die Auswirkungen von Atomkraftwerken und Katastrophen abdecken.

Die zweite ist "Geschichte Bildung und Intervention in der Presse".

Es sollte nicht in die Interpretation von historischen Problemen für Schulunterrichtsmaterialien eingreifen, aber es ist wichtig, dass die Bemühungen, die Öffentlichkeit über schwere Verbrechen zu informieren, indem sie die Aufmerksamkeit auf die Ereignisse in Japan während der Kriegszeit, und die Regierung fordert Unterstützung.

Besondere Berichterstatterin, um das "Recht der Wahrheit" zu besuchen, um die öffentlichen Informationen über schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen zu verifizieren, einschließlich der Trostfrauen, die er darum bittet.

Die dritte mit dem Titel "Wahlkampagne und Demo", um die "unausgewogene Beschränkungen der politischen Kampagne" im öffentlichen Wahlgesetz zu beseitigen, um das Wahlrecht dem internationalen Menschenrechtsgesetz zu entsprechen.

Okinawa, die Strafverfolgungsbehörde hat alle Anstrengungen unternommen, um Proteste und Interviews ohne Ungleichgewicht Strafe auferlegt auf die Menschen, die Freiheit, Opposition auszudrücken ist nicht verletzt er fragt uns zu tun.

Das folgende bezieht sich auf das spezifische Geheimschutzgesetz, nach diesem Gesetz sollte das Gesetz überarbeitet werden, um nicht zu schrumpfen die Medien, Medien und Beamten werden auch für die Offenlegung von Informationen für das öffentliche Interesse bestraft, die die nationale Sicherheit nicht gefährdet. Es gibt eine Ausnahmeregel Dass es nichts gibt, und die Durchsetzung dieses Gesetzes fordert die Einrichtung einer unabhängigen Überwachungseinrichtung.

Die folgenden Beziehungen zum spezifischen Geheimschutzgesetz, das Gesetz sollte überarbeitet werden, um die Medien zu schrumpfen, Medien und Beamte werden auch nicht für die Offenlegung von Informationen für das öffentliche Interesse bestraft, die die nationale Sicherheit nicht gefährden, um Ausnahmeregeln festzulegen und diese zu erzwingen Gesetz fordert die Einrichtung einer unabhängigen Überwachungseinrichtung.

Und schließlich sollten wir ein Antidiskriminierungsgesetz einführen, das weitgehend auf "Diskriminierung und Hassrede" angewandt werden kann.

Auf diese Weise basiert sein Argument und sein Bewusstsein auf unbegründeten falschen Tatsachen.

Ich möchte daran zweifeln, dass jemand es weht.

Dieser Entwurf geht weiter.

Desta forma, seu argumento e consciência são baseados em fatos errados infundados.

O seguinte é a continuação do capítulo anterior.

Argumentos e problemas de Kay

O argumento do Sr. Kay em grande parte dividido em 5 pontos, 8 itens.

Primeiro, "independência da mídia".

O Sr. Kay analisa o Artigo 4 da Lei de Radiodifusão e está buscando a eliminação.

Os regulamentos sobre transmissão devem ser deixados para a instituição que é independente do país, e está buscando que seja necessário criar um quadro para essas instituições.

E a segunda é que se deve prestar atenção ao apoio à mídia que aborda questões como as atividades militares dos EUA em Okinawa, o impacto das usinas nucleares e desastres.

O segundo é "educação histórica e intervenção na imprensa".

Não deve intervir na interpretação de problemas históricos para o material didático escolar, mas é importante que os esforços para informar o público de crimes graves, atentos aos eventos envolvidos no Japão durante a guerra, e o governo pede apoio.

Relator Especial para visitar o "direito da verdade", a fim de verificar a informação pública sobre violações graves dos direitos humanos, incluindo a questão do conforto das mulheres que ele está pedindo.

A terceira intitulada "Campanha Eleitoral e Demo", para eliminar a provisão de "restrições desequilibradas na campanha política" na Lei Eleitoral Pública para tornar a lei eleitoral em conformidade com o direito internacional dos direitos humanos.

Okinawa, a agência de aplicação da lei envidou todos os esforços para fazer protestos e entrevistas sem uma sanção de desequilíbrio impostas às pessoas, a liberdade de expressar oposição não é violada, ele está nos pedindo para fazer.

O seguinte se refere à Lei de Proteção Secreta Específica, nos termos desta lei, a lei deve ser revisada não para o encolher, os meios de comunicação, os meios de comunicação e os funcionários públicos também são punidos por divulgação de informações para interesse público que não põe em perigo a segurança nacional Existe uma regra de exceção Que não há nada, e a aplicação desta lei exige o estabelecimento de uma instituição de monitoramento independente.

As seguintes relações com a Lei de Proteção Secreta Específica, a lei deve ser revisada para diminuir a mídia, os meios de comunicação e os funcionários públicos também não são punidos pela divulgação de informações para interesse público que não põe em perigo a segurança nacional para estabelecer regras de exceção e aplicação desta A lei insta o estabelecimento de uma instituição independente de monitoramento.

E, finalmente, devemos introduzir uma lei antidiscriminação que pode ser amplamente aplicada em "discursos de discriminação e ódio".

Desta forma, seu argumento e consciência são baseados em fatos errados infundados.

Quero duvidar, mesmo que alguém esteja soprando.

Este rascunho continua.

这样他的论据和意识是基于毫无根据的错误事实。

以下是上一章的延续。

凯的论点和问题

凯先生的论点大致分为5分8项。

一是“媒体独立”。

凯先生回顾“广播法”第四条，并正在寻求消除。

广播规定应留给独立于该国的机构，并且正在寻求有必要为这些机构建立一个框架。

第二个是应该重视对涉及冲绳美军事活动，核电厂和灾害影响等问题的媒体的支持。

二是“历史教育与媒体干预”。

不应该介入解释学校教材的历史问题，而且在战时要注意日本的事情，努力向公众宣传严重的犯罪行为，政府要求支持。

特别报告员访问“真相权利”，以核查关于严重侵犯人权行为的新闻，包括他正在要求的慰安妇问题。

第三个题为“选举运动和演示”的消除“公开选举法”规定的“不平衡的政治竞选限制”，使选举法符合国际人权法。

冲绳，执法机关尽全力执行抗议和访谈，对人民施加不平衡的处罚，表示反对的自由不违反他要求我们做的事情。

以下涉及“特殊秘密保护法”，根据这一法律规定，法律不应因为媒体的缩小而被修改，媒体和公职人员也因公共利益信息披露而受到惩罚，不危害国家安全有一个例外规则没有什么，执法这个法律，是要建立一个独立的监督机构。

以下与具体秘密保护法的关系，法律应修改为缩小媒体，媒体和公职人员也不会因公共利益的信息披露而受到惩罚，不危害国家安全制定例外规则，并执行此法律敦促建立独立的监督机构。

最后，我们应该引入反歧视法，可以广泛应用于“歧视与仇恨言论”。

这样他的论据和意识是基于毫无根据的错误事实。

我想怀疑即使有人在吹它。

该草案继续。

이런 식으로 그의

다음은 이전 장의 계속입니다.

케이의 주장과 문제

케이 씨의 주장은 크게 5 점, 8 항목으로 나뉘어져 있습니다.

첫째, "미디어의 독립성".

Kay는 방송법 제 4 조를 검토하고 철폐를 모색 중입니다.

방송에 관한 규정은 국가와 무관 한 기관에 맡겨야하며 그러한 기관을위한 틀을 마련하는 것이 필요하다.

둘째, 오키나와에서의 미군 관련 활동, 원자력 발전소 및 재해의 영향 등을 다루는 언론의 지원에주의를 기울여야한다는 것입니다.

두 번째는 "언론에 대한 역사 교육 및 개입"입니다.

학교 교재의 역사적 문제에 대한 해석에는 개입해서는 안되지만 전쟁 중 일본에 관련된 사건에주의를 기울여 심각한 범죄를 대중에게 알리는 노력이 중요하며 정부는 지원을 요청하고 있습니다.

그는 그가 요구하고있는 위안부 문제를 포함하여 심각한 인권 침해에 관한 공개 정보를 검증하기 위해 "진실권"을 방문하는 특별 보고관.

세 번째는 "선거 운동과 민주화 운동"이라는 제목으로, 선거법이 국제 인권법을 준수하도록하는 선거법상의 "정치 캠페인에 대한 불균형 한 제한"조항을 제거하기위한 것이다.

오키나와 법 집행 기관은 국민에게 부과 된 불균형의 처벌없이 시위와 인터뷰를 시행하기 위해 모든 노력을 기울였으며 야당을 표현할 자유는 침해받지 않았다.

다음은 특정 비밀 보호법과 관련이 있으며이 법률에 따라 법률을 개정하여 미디어를 축소하지 말아야하며 언론과 공무원도 국가 안보에 위배되지 않는 공익을위한 정보 공개에 대해 처벌 받는다 예외 규칙 아무 것도 없다는 것과이 법의 집행은 독립적 인 모니터링 기관의 설립을 촉구한다.

특정 비밀 보호법에 대한 다음과 같은 관계, 법률을 개정해야한다 언론, 미디어 및 공무원도 공개 규칙에 대한 국가 안보를 위태롭게하지 않는 공익을위한 정보 공개에 대한 처벌을받지 않으며 이의 집행 법은 독립적 인 모니터링 기관의 설립을 촉구한다.

마지막으로 "차별과 증오심 표현"에 널리 적용될 수있는 반 차별 법을 도입해야합니다.

이런 식으로 그의 주장과 인식은 근거없는 잘못된 사실을 근거로합니다.

나는 누군가가 그것을 불고 있다고 의심하고 싶다.

이 초안은 계속됩니다.

Таким образом, его аргументы

Следующее - продолжение предыдущей главы.

Аргументы и проблемы Кей

Аргумент г-на Кей был в основном разделен на 5 пунктов, 8 пунктов.

Во-первых, «независимость СМИ».

Г-н Кей рассматривает статью 4 Закона о вещании и стремится к ликвидации.

Правила вещания должны быть переданы учреждению, независимому от страны, и оно стремится создать основу для таких учреждений.

Во-вторых, следует обратить внимание на поддержку средств массовой информации, которые охватывают такие вопросы, как военная деятельность США на Окинаве, влияние атомных электростанций и бедствий.

Второе - «образование в истории и вмешательство в прессу».

Он не должен вмешиваться в интерпретацию исторических проблем для учебных материалов школы, но важно, чтобы усилия по информированию общественности о серьезных преступлениях, обращая внимание на события, происходящие в Японии в военное время, и правительство призывает к поддержке.

Специальный докладчик посетил «право правды», чтобы проверить общественную информацию о серьезных нарушениях прав человека, в том числе о женщинах-утешителях, которые он просит.

Третий, озаглавленный «Избирательная кампания и демонстрация», для устранения «несбалансированных ограничений политической кампании» в Законе о публичных выборах, чтобы закон о выборах соответствовал международному праву в области прав человека.

Окинава, правоохранительные органы прилагает все усилия для обеспечения протестов и интервью без наказания за несбалансированность, налагаемого на людей, свобода выражения возражений не нарушается, он просит нас сделать.

Следующее относится к Закону о специальной секретной защите в соответствии с этим законом, закон следует пересмотреть не до сокращения СМИ, СМИ и публичных должностных лиц, также наказываются за раскрытие информации для общественных интересов, которая не ставит под угрозу национальную безопасность. Существует правило исключения Что нет ничего, и применение этого закона требует создания независимого наблюдательного учреждения.

Следующие отношения к Закону о специальной секретной защите, закон должен быть пересмотрен до сокращения СМИ, СМИ и публичных должностных лиц также не наказываются за раскрытие информации для общественных интересов, что не ставит под угрозу национальную безопасность для установления правил исключения и обеспечения соблюдения этого закона Закон требует создания независимого наблюдательного учреждения.

И, наконец, мы должны ввести антидискриминационный закон, который можно широко применять в отношении «дискриминации и ненависти».

Таким образом, его аргументы и осознание основаны на необоснованных неправильных фактах.

Я хочу усомниться, что кто-то его дует.

Этот проект продолжается.

Dengan cara ini hujah dan kesedarannya didasarkan pada fakta yang tidak berasas.

Berikut adalah kesinambungan bab sebelumnya.

Hujah dan masalah Kay

Argumen Encik Kay sebahagian besar dibahagikan kepada 5 mata, 8 item.

Pertama, "kemerdekaan media".

Encik Kay mengulas Artikel 4 Undang-undang Penyiaran dan sedang mencari penghapusan.

Peraturan-peraturan mengenai penyiaran perlu ditinggalkan kepada institusi yang bebas daripada negara, dan ia menuntut agar perlu mewujudkan rangka kerja bagi institusi tersebut.

Dan yang kedua ialah perhatian harus dibayar kepada sokongan media yang meliputi isu-isu seperti kegiatan berkaitan tentera AS di Okinawa, kesan tumbuhan tenaga nuklir dan bencana.

Yang kedua adalah "pendidikan sejarah dan campur tangan dalam akhbar".

Ia tidak harus campur tangan dalam penafsiran masalah sejarah untuk bahan pengajaran sekolah, tetapi adalah penting bahawa usaha untuk memaklumkan orang ramai tentang jenayah serius dengan memperhatikan peristiwa-peristiwa yang terlibat di Jepun semasa perang, dan kerajaan meminta bantuan.

Pelapor Khas untuk melawat "hak kebenaran" untuk mengesahkan maklumat awam tentang pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang serius termasuk isu wanita yang selesa yang dia minta.

Yang ketiga bertajuk "Kempen dan Demokrasi Pilihan Raya", untuk menghapuskan "larangan tidak seimbang pada kempen politik" dalam Undang-undang Pemilihan Umum untuk membuat undang-undang pemilihan mematuhi undang-undang hak asasi manusia antarabangsa.

Okinawa, agensi penguatkuasaan undang-undang telah membuat segala usaha untuk menegakkan protes dan wawancara tanpa hukuman ketidakseimbangan yang dikenakan kepada rakyat, kebebasan untuk menyatakan pembangkang tidak dilanggar yang dia meminta kami lakukan.

Berikut ini adalah berkaitan dengan Undang-undang Perlindungan Rahsia Tertentu, di bawah undang-undang ini, undang-undang perlu disemak bukan untuk mengecil media, media dan pegawai awam juga dihukum untuk pendedahan maklumat untuk kepentingan umum yang tidak membahayakan keselamatan negara Terdapat peraturan pengecualian Bahawa tidak ada apa-apa, dan penguatkuasaan undang-undang ini mendesak penubuhan lembaga pengawasan bebas.

Hubungan berikut kepada Undang-undang Perlindungan Rahsia Tertentu, undang-undang perlu disemak semula untuk mengecilkan media, media dan pegawai awam juga tidak dihukum untuk pendedahan maklumat untuk kepentingan awam yang tidak membahayakan keselamatan negara untuk mewujudkan peraturan pengecualian, dan penguatkuasaan ini Undang-undang mendesak penubuhan institusi pengawasan bebas.

Dan akhirnya, kita harus memperkenalkan undang-undang anti diskriminasi yang boleh digunakan secara meluas dalam "diskriminasi dan kebencian".

Dengan cara ini hujah dan kesedarannya didasarkan pada fakta yang tidak berasas.

Saya mahu meragui walaupun seseorang meniupnya.

Draf ini berterusan.