The reading column of the major newspapers in Japan on Sunday referred many times when the world was eminent and the excellent one continued introduction.
This week, Nikkei was good.
It isn't exaggerated even if it says that it is proving the right of Akutagawa's article in addition to being a fine example in it.
"Following the rules” Written by Joseph Heath
The social behavior of the human being who sees from “the morality”
(Takizawa Hirokazu translation, 5800 yen of NTT publishing)
▼ The author is born in 67.
The philosopher in Canada
The professor of The University of Toronto
“It boils and therefore, it doesn't well find how the human society functions that to make clear is moving ahead therefore to the colony of the ant ".
Heath of the author is a spirited philosopher in the middle of the forty, and this manual focuses on the social behavior of the human being who is called "observance of the rules" and tries to answer this question.
The approach which argues about the classic theme of the philosophy, " the morality ", while the most advanced study results such as the economics, the theory of game, the psychology, the evolution biology are based is fresh.
It becomes the contents which charm a wide reader through the criticism of the theory of each field and the raising the issue.
Also, there is reality as they are debating immediately with the essence of the philosophy and the histories of thought such as Kant and Wittgenstein meeting the most advanced argument, too, excellently and reviving just like in today.
According to the Heath, of the social science in the 20th century especially, as for the economics, by the rise of the expected-utility-theory, it slighted the role which the human moral side gives the action.
However, are supporting basis of the rationality of the human being actually by the morality and moreover the source of the morality is not the metaphysical one as a lot of philosophers say.
The moral model, " following a rule ", is the cultured artifact which was accumulated, taking time which is supported by " the model synchronism " of the human being like the language and is long.
*I repeat a Kyoto visit and it is to tell this thing to the world that I take yards in Kyoto.
It is because there is one of the reasons why "the turntable of civilization" went around to Japan.
It isn't exaggerated even if it says that the moral model didn't grow into the plausible false country.
In the historic reason, Akutagawa referred in the book.
These considerations provide clear the making of the side how micro- a new frame human behavior especially.
It is the reason that the title had a subtitle, " the model theory introduction of the social science ".
However, at the same time, this manual is wealthy in the big suggestion on the place to think of the diplomatic issues such as the bigger side of the human society, i.e. the terrorism and the war.
The moral model has the in-group bias which is therefore strong that the culture depends but in the different intergroup, too, the human being is because it is possible to make the system of the model be changed through the interaction.
For the reader of the member of society who is busy, the expression and the language which is peculiar to the philosophy book are never friendly but the plain explanation which depends on the translator will make this up.
It makes contents our near problem consciousness in the direct connection and it is one that the response increases as the reading progresses.
Critic Ozeki Koyo of Economic critic
This week, Nikkei was good.
It isn't exaggerated even if it says that it is proving the right of Akutagawa's article in addition to being a fine example in it.
"Following the rules” Written by Joseph Heath
The social behavior of the human being who sees from “the morality”
(Takizawa Hirokazu translation, 5800 yen of NTT publishing)
▼ The author is born in 67.
The philosopher in Canada
The professor of The University of Toronto
“It boils and therefore, it doesn't well find how the human society functions that to make clear is moving ahead therefore to the colony of the ant ".
Heath of the author is a spirited philosopher in the middle of the forty, and this manual focuses on the social behavior of the human being who is called "observance of the rules" and tries to answer this question.
The approach which argues about the classic theme of the philosophy, " the morality ", while the most advanced study results such as the economics, the theory of game, the psychology, the evolution biology are based is fresh.
It becomes the contents which charm a wide reader through the criticism of the theory of each field and the raising the issue.
Also, there is reality as they are debating immediately with the essence of the philosophy and the histories of thought such as Kant and Wittgenstein meeting the most advanced argument, too, excellently and reviving just like in today.
According to the Heath, of the social science in the 20th century especially, as for the economics, by the rise of the expected-utility-theory, it slighted the role which the human moral side gives the action.
However, are supporting basis of the rationality of the human being actually by the morality and moreover the source of the morality is not the metaphysical one as a lot of philosophers say.
The moral model, " following a rule ", is the cultured artifact which was accumulated, taking time which is supported by " the model synchronism " of the human being like the language and is long.
*I repeat a Kyoto visit and it is to tell this thing to the world that I take yards in Kyoto.
It is because there is one of the reasons why "the turntable of civilization" went around to Japan.
It isn't exaggerated even if it says that the moral model didn't grow into the plausible false country.
In the historic reason, Akutagawa referred in the book.
These considerations provide clear the making of the side how micro- a new frame human behavior especially.
It is the reason that the title had a subtitle, " the model theory introduction of the social science ".
However, at the same time, this manual is wealthy in the big suggestion on the place to think of the diplomatic issues such as the bigger side of the human society, i.e. the terrorism and the war.
The moral model has the in-group bias which is therefore strong that the culture depends but in the different intergroup, too, the human being is because it is possible to make the system of the model be changed through the interaction.
For the reader of the member of society who is busy, the expression and the language which is peculiar to the philosophy book are never friendly but the plain explanation which depends on the translator will make this up.
It makes contents our near problem consciousness in the direct connection and it is one that the response increases as the reading progresses.
Critic Ozeki Koyo of Economic critic