Japan has the right to possess nuclear weapons first.

The following is from the final chapter of his paper published in the monthly magazine WiLL this month, entitled Japan, have a nuclear weapon!
Ishizumi Kanji Jewish International Lawyer
Stop 'American Dog'
Naturally, nuclear weapons for self-defense are also possible under the current constitution.
Protecting the public's safety and peace is the duty of the state and government.
So what's wrong with having the latest weapons (nuclear weapons).
I don't understand at all. 
And if you're anxious about the future of Japan (the people), why don't politicians take the nuclear-armed argument from the front?
The past Prime Ministers who have not mentioned nuclear possession because they feared the government's collapse, are irresponsible and shameful. 
Instead of abandoning nuclear weapons because it is the only country to have suffered atomic bombs, it is necessary to 'protect with nuclear weapons because it is the only country to have suffered atomic bombs.'
Japan has the right to possess nuclear weapons first.
McArthur's constitution overthrowing and so on are the nonsense that a poet says and aren't making a remark that the leader of a country does.
Except for a few exceptions, successive prime ministers clung to the position of the administration, so the American compliance was unable to make a majestic proposal for 'Japan has a nuclear weapon!' 
In particular, former Prime Minister Kakuei Tanaka, who aimed solely for Japanese independence, but they see the figure made to fall from power in Lockheed bribery scandals vividly. 
About a Liberal Democratic Party administration after that, the puppet government continues, saying 'I, either, don 't finish for free if opposed to America.'
However, France's President Macron hasn't to say that the United States no longer has the power, and loses both a feeling and energy and money to deploy an aircraft carrier fleet to any country in the world and to perform armed interventions.
If this situation continues, the Japanese people will overlook the loss of national wealth, spending ten years or 20 years playing the game of the rugby and Olympics.
It overlooks the Japanese people spending ten years or 20 years, playing the game of the rugby and Olympics, and the national wealth being lost if this condition continues.
Japan is not only made to be at the extinction and prosperous crossroads, but also a rudder is already turned to the direction of the destruction.
I feel even that it already missed the opportunity.
We want to keep the faint hope of 'Japan revives,' but it isn't easy to regain the national wealth if not cutting the significant starboard here.
It is a rich country after a strong army has.
The example of 'rich country, weak army → the fall of the states' is historically too many to count, to the first on the list in Aleppo.
The opposition party is not to speak of, and there is no room for expectation from the ruling party, but I sincerely hope that leaders with action and competence will appear.