The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Emphasis on sentences and * ~ * are mine.
"The" comfort women "problem is a typical example of the damage as a military sexual slave, the fact that the military's involvement and compulsion is a clear historical fact today" (June 1996, President Kioi Akio)
Also, in December 2010, the Korean Bar Association and in a joint name, the proposal that the comfort women problem should be considered to further spread to society through education, public relations etc. are being proposed.
* I also learned this fact for the first time. Every keen-eyed men will be convinced that my thesis was quite right. At the same time, it really should shudder. *
A lawyer who received counsel from Amako refused the request in accordance with the way the JFBA thinks.
Then, decided comfort women as "sexual slavery" "compulsion", is the JFBA statement correct?
On the contrary, it is now common sense that these arguments are unfounded errors.
In October 26, Mr. Kosho Harutomo, an attorney in Oita Prefecture, pointed out the influence of a series of comfort women wrong coverage of the Asahi Shimbun on the attitude of the JFBA on its own homepage, he is drawn so gravely.
"As with the Asahi Shimbun, there are organizations that appeal to the international public opinion in the wrong way the problem of comfort women and have reduced the national interests of Japan. It's a JFBA”
"It is not an exaggeration to say that the JFBA has violated the human rights of all Japanese citizens as a result while advocating for defending human rights."
This draft continues.
