Mr. lee suspects that Arirang author Jo Jung-rae is obsessed with the madness of genocide.

The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
Is there a reasonable reason?
The long novel 'Arirang,' which has consisted of 12 volumes sold a total of 3.5 million copies, has several scenes of land surveys.
A police officer in the police substation where enforces the investigation expels the protest of farmer deprived of land, and ties them to the trunk of a tree and shoots them to death.
The scene in which the Japanese army described in the novel 'Arirang' massacres Koreans is an absurd extreme.
'Arirang' wrote that 1,000 Korean workers were slaughtered at a civil engineering work site for the defense of the Kuril Islands, which was a Japanese territory at the time.
When the construction was completed, the Japanese army 'confined Korean workers in air defenses' 'throwing grenades for 10 minutes and killing them by adding machine guns', besides, the author wrote that the Japanese army similarly killed more than 4,000 people.
It is a scene reminiscent of the ridiculous movie 'The Battleship Island.'
The malicious idea that the Japanese killed all Koreans is two peas in a pod.
As a result of the investigation, Mr. Lee concludes, 'This terrible massacre is not true'. He asks if there is a reasonable reason to slaughter the labor shortage during the war and finally secure the valuable personnel.
On top of that, Mr. lee suspects that Arirang author Jo Jung-rae is obsessed with the madness of genocide.
Also, in this book, the lie in a Korean textbook that teaches that Japan has 'taken 40% of the land of Korea' has been uncovered, and the deception in the discourse that the Japanese have taken food from Korea has also been revealed.
Co-author Dongguk University economics professor Nak Nyeon KIM introduced an article on 'The Dong-a Ilbo' on June 16, 1931.
The article reports on the information that Japan and Korea were both outstanding harvests during the year. That rice imports (transfers) from the Korean peninsula would be restricted due to the excessive supply of rice.
'As Korean farmer' s position, we have no choice but to oppose the bringing-in limitation (omission) by the establishment of the law and also any action that restrains the liberty of the Korean rice outflow. '
Instead of the Japanese taking away rice, Korean farmers were eager to export rice.
This article continues.