The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Emphasis on writing is me.
Mr. Kaya picked up pressure on protests against US bases in Japan in Okinawa and imbalanced punishment is imposed on the people, he is seeking rectification so that freedom of opposition is not infringed, as an example of this, he points out that the five-month detention of Mr. Hiroji Yamashiro, the central member of the Okinawa Peace Movement Center, is unjust.
Mr. Yamashiro also spoke at the United Nations on 15th, accusing the Japanese government of "repression by the police force", also accused himself of detention "human rights violation."
This detention is due to suspicion that it hampered injuries that took two weeks to interfere with the official duties of Okinawa Defense Bureau officials who were on the road for construction of the helipad in the Northern Training Center.
Mr. Yamashiro built about 1,500 concrete blocks in front of the Camp Schwab gates in the Henoko area and used power to obstruct the relocation work.
It is not the reason why he was arrested, detained, charged with protests and opposition activities.
It is because there was an illegal act including violence.
He was arrested three times after October 17, 2016, but once a crime committed in the presence of a policeman, there was a reasonable reason enough to doubt that he sinned the other twice.
Even with the necessity of detention the judge approved and the procedure was advanced.
Freedom of expression is guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution.
It is not permissible to infinitely limit it by law.
Just to recognize that borrowing the name to freedom of expression and breaking laws and justifying your illegal acts by freedom of expression is an act similar to freedom of expression itself not.
Whether the protesters are protests or opposition activities, if they go according to laws and regulations, they will not be punished, and it is natural that they should be excluded if there is any illegal activity there.
It is illegal rather than protest activities that are eliminated.
However, if Mr. Kaya is the purpose of opposing struggle against US forces in Japan, it seems to be said that even if it is violence it is permissible.
This assertion closely resembles assertions of activists and others.
This draft continues.
