While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Trimming policy and special national character
I would like everyone to have the right awareness of Korea before entering this thesis. 
Historically, Korea has lived mainly as a dependency with suzerain as the Chinese dynasty.
Korea have a specific characteristic character, which is thoroughly subservient to strong people, but they take over overbearing attitude for weak ones.
There is no doubt that the history of their country is affecting their national character.
Considering that, it is understood that it is the nature of this country that it is contrary to the diplomatic ritual and breaking the promise, and it has not started recently. 
Last year, some people enjoyed NHK's Taiga drama ‘Saigo don’ and saw it.
Towards the end, Saigo Takamori got upset with Korea's rudeness and chanted ‘Theory of Conquest of Korea’, there was a scene where he retired from public life.
It is an important scene that will eventually lead to Satsuma Rebellion. 
Although it did not describe the reason in detail in the program, that originated in the famous ‘shokei (form of the letters used in negotiations) problem’.
In 1868, the Meiji government who defeated the Edo shogunate sent a nationwide letter notifying the establishment of a new administration and establishing a modern international relationship based on the treaty to all over the world.
While countries received reply of compliance one after another, there were countries that responded strangely. It is Korea.
Joseon, a subordinate country of the Qing Dynasty, discovered that there were letters ‘empress’ and ‘imperium’ in the national book.
Korea refused to accept the letter from Japan, saying that it is not permitted to use this character other than the Qing Dynasty.
Even if the Meiji government attempts to contact many times, it continues to be rude ‘refusal to accept’, leading to that theory of conquest. 
Even if formal diplomatic relations began when the Qing Dynasty received the National Book, the attitude of Korea did not change.
A power struggle between the king's Gojong of Korea, his wife · Empress Myeongseong and the King's father Heungseon Daewongun, civilians with only corruption, citizens poverty-stricken with no social infrastructure being developed at all, and a deserted land ...
Such as Korea continued taking Japan's attitude of lacking diplomatic rites.
Following strong ones, the ‘trimming policy’ which takes a declining attitude other than that is true for Korea as it is.
And that is taking root in Korea now.
Even in the so-called 'drafting worker' ruling, that is clear. 
The Japan-Korea Claim Agreement which abandoned mutual claim rights and ‘completely and finally resolved’ is a major premise of the Japan-Korea Basic Treaty in which diplomatic relations between Japan and South Korea have been normalized.
Korean judicature turned this upside down.
The reason is that ‘Japanese governance is illicitly illegal, and what is done there is not included in the subject of the agreement’. 
In other words, the Japan-Korea annexation treaty that was connected between the Great Japan Empire and the Korean Empire in 1910 is ‘illicitly, illegal’ and is ‘not allowed’.
Turn over the promises among nations and shift the conditions with the passage of time.
Be good at 'moving goal post' Korea, that's how he is.
However, they do not know how this is ‘abnormal’ and ‘unreasonable’.
This draft continues.