there is no attitude to explore historical facts and causal relationship at that time

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In holding the Japan - Russia Summit Meeting in December 2016, I felt a sense of crisis that Japanese media launched a series of observation balloons such as 'two islands Preceded' and 'Coordinated Government' two Islands (preceding) Returning I issued a warning 'Those theory is nothing but theory of 2 Island abandonment of Kunashir and Iturup' (Issue 2016 12).

In conclusion, I appealed that Japan should first regain its historical awareness and secure the power to ‘stand as a country’ and then conduct full-blown negotiations on the Northern Territories issue.

That idea has not changed.

Cold war in Asia is like to be planted seeds by the United States and the UK

Watanabe

Speaking of territorial cuts, in the case of Germany it was more miserable than Japan.

It lost Eastern Prussia (East Prussia) and it was robbed of the territory to the Oder River, which is now the border with Poland.

Most of the exiled German residents headed to Berlin, but they had encountered plunder and rape of Soviet troops along the way, and none remained when they arrived in Berlin.

What was waiting there further is GI who inflated pocket with Allied Mark which the occupied country issued without permission.

In the paper of the National Archives of the United States of America, it is said that in 1946 as many as 500,000 German women had lived for prostitution.

Nakanishi

Because of the Second World War, in the case of Europe, a cruel territory change occurred more than any war of the past, which was fixed as the postwar European order.

In Japan, as well as the escape of hardships experienced by repatriates from continent such as Manchuria, hundreds of thousands of Japanese and German civilians, and millions of people were deprived of their lives in the process of their territorial change it was.

Although the history of this tragedy has been placed outside the field of view, even now in the former Allied Powers.

So, as for Germans, there is a sense that why the sticking to the 'small problem' of return of the Northern Territories, why they should not pursue as a responsibility for post-war processing of the Allies.

Watanabe

Furthermore, Japanese school education absolutely does not teach, it is destruction of German industrial infrastructure by US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau and agricultural plan, so-called ‘Morgenthau · plan’.

Before the defeat, Germany exported industrial products and used it for importing agricultural crops, but due to Morgenthau's ‘ridiculous plan’, it was transformed into an economic structure that depended on agriculture, resulting in direct hit of famine.

According to the Canadian historian James Buck's ‘Crimes and Mercies’, there are 5.7 million civilians in Germany plus 2.5 million German refugees who were excluded from Eastern Europe and returned to mainland Germany, 1.1 million war prisoners, more than 9 million people lost their lives with famine.

Regarding the rebuilding of the postwar Europe, there are descriptions of the Marshall plan when seeing Japanese textbooks, but we ignore the tragedy Morgenthau · plan originated.

It is important to describe not only the part of the light brought by the victorious country but also the part of the shadow in a balanced manner.

In that regard, I do not think Japan - US relations will get worse.

Nakanishi

The view of history and the order of the modern Japanese was made in the Cold War era, especially in Asia where the Soviets are 'evil', the United States and Britain are 'good', as in the Second World War, even in the Cold War, Justice has won 'only to' Empire of evil 'It is common understanding of history That the Imperial Japanese Empire and the Soviet Union collapsed naturally.

This ‘United States and Britain = Justice view of history’ continues to tie down Japanese diplomacy even though it is getting stronger after the end of the Cold War.

However, let's say that that was the greatest mistake in the 'Tokyo tribunal historical perspective' and it was a big mistake.

And the North - South divide on the Korean Peninsula, which is currently in progress, is originally, in the Yalta conflict, UK and the United States urged the Soviets to participate in the war with Japan.

As the Soviet troops invaded Manchuria stayed for more than a year, the Communist Party of China was based on Manchuria won through (Second) Chinese Civil War, they were able to establish the People's Republic of China.

If so, the Cold War of Asia including the division of the Korean Peninsula is like seeding by the United States and Britain.

The tragedies of Manchuria withdrawal and the redness of China are responsible not only for the Soviet Union but also for the United States and the UK, and all are ‘The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan" surrender: Feb. 11, 1945) ‘may be said.

Watanabe

All the weapons that the Kwantung Army of Manchuria had had passed to the Chinese Communist Party.

Nakanishi

At that time, it was clear that Chiang Kai - shek 's military arm of the Kuomintang who was cut off from the United States was defeated by the Communist troops

Thus, a communist country was born on the mainland of China and the Korean Peninsula was also negotiated by the Yalta talks under the trusteeship of allied countries including the Soviet Union.

However, the Soviets occupied the North from the 38th line, sent Kim Il Sung to establish North Korea (DPR Korea). In case

The tragedy of the inter-Korean division begins here, and its main reason is rather demanded by Anglo-Saxon allies of the United States and Britain.

At least, in the sense that it caused confusion in Northeast Asia, the United States and Britain and the Soviets should be regarded as ‘the same sin’.

Most importantly all Japanese should remember that the participation of the Soviets against Japan was done by unilaterally abandoning Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact.

It is a clear international law violation and the United States and Britain who gave Stalin to participate in the war against Japan should be charged with the guilt and assistance of invasion war against Japan.

Since Stalin was originally a cowardly man, there is a high possibility that he would have hesitated to participate in the war against Japan unless Roosevelt or Churchill had a boost.

In that sense, the U.K. and U.K would just have helped the Soviet invasion against Japan.

As a result, the Soviets acquired Manchuria, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands that were under Japanese rule, and a storm of conflict due to the spread of communism spread throughout Asia throughout the postwar period.

In other words, it is necessary to see that all suffering over the cold war in postwar Asia was ‘responsibility of the Allied Powers as a whole’.

Watanabe

After that, the UK and the United States won the great war, but Poland eventually fell to the hands of Stalin.

The main point of ‘Hull Note’ was that Japan was withdrawing from China, but in the end, China was also communized.

This is the consequence of the contradiction of the Atlantic charter of appealing the worldwide construction of democracy while adding Soviets which are not democracies to their allies.

How was Roosevelt and Churchill's war guidance wrong?

However, most of British and American history books divert their attention from these facts. That is to ignore it.

It is because the evaluation ‘Roosevelt and Churchill is a great leader’ is crushed from the root.

Also, most of the Japanese history books are looking away from the result brought by the guidance of the two guys (Expansion of Communism) and are keen only to accuse the Japanese leader's stupidity at the same time.

It is extremely disappointing that there is no attitude to explore historical facts and causal relationship at that time from an international perspective.

This draft continues.

Most importantly all Japanese should remember that the participation of the Soviets against Japan

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In holding the Japan - Russia Summit Meeting in December 2016, I felt a sense of crisis that Japanese media launched a series of observation balloons such as 'two islands Preceded' and 'Coordinated Government' two Islands (preceding) Returning I issued a warning 'Those theory is nothing but theory of 2 Island abandonment of Kunashir and Iturup' (Issue 2016 12).

In conclusion, I appealed that Japan should first regain its historical awareness and secure the power to ‘stand as a country’ and then conduct full-blown negotiations on the Northern Territories issue.

That idea has not changed.

Cold war in Asia is like to be planted seeds by the United States and the UK

Watanabe

Speaking of territorial cuts, in the case of Germany it was more miserable than Japan.

It lost Eastern Prussia (East Prussia) and it was robbed of the territory to the Oder River, which is now the border with Poland.

Most of the exiled German residents headed to Berlin, but they had encountered plunder and rape of Soviet troops along the way, and none remained when they arrived in Berlin.

What was waiting there further is GI who inflated pocket with Allied Mark which the occupied country issued without permission.

In the paper of the National Archives of the United States of America, it is said that in 1946 as many as 500,000 German women had lived for prostitution.

Nakanishi

Because of the Second World War, in the case of Europe, a cruel territory change occurred more than any war of the past, which was fixed as the postwar European order.

In Japan, as well as the escape of hardships experienced by repatriates from continent such as Manchuria, hundreds of thousands of Japanese and German civilians, and millions of people were deprived of their lives in the process of their territorial change it was.

Although the history of this tragedy has been placed outside the field of view, even now in the former Allied Powers.

So, as for Germans, there is a sense that why the sticking to the 'small problem' of return of the Northern Territories, why they should not pursue as a responsibility for post-war processing of the Allies.

Watanabe

Furthermore, Japanese school education absolutely does not teach, it is destruction of German industrial infrastructure by US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau and agricultural plan, so-called ‘Morgenthau · plan’.

Before the defeat, Germany exported industrial products and used it for importing agricultural crops, but due to Morgenthau's ‘ridiculous plan’, it was transformed into an economic structure that depended on agriculture, resulting in direct hit of famine.

According to the Canadian historian James Buck's ‘Crimes and Mercies’, there are 5.7 million civilians in Germany plus 2.5 million German refugees who were excluded from Eastern Europe and returned to mainland Germany, 1.1 million war prisoners, more than 9 million people lost their lives with famine.

Regarding the rebuilding of the postwar Europe, there are descriptions of the Marshall plan when seeing Japanese textbooks, but we ignore the tragedy Morgenthau · plan originated.

It is important to describe not only the part of the light brought by the victorious country but also the part of the shadow in a balanced manner.

In that regard, I do not think Japan - US relations will get worse.

Nakanishi

The view of history and the order of the modern Japanese was made in the Cold War era, especially in Asia where the Soviets are 'evil', the United States and Britain are 'good', as in the Second World War, even in the Cold War, Justice has won 'only to' Empire of evil 'It is common understanding of history That the Imperial Japanese Empire and the Soviet Union collapsed naturally.

This ‘United States and Britain = Justice view of history’ continues to tie down Japanese diplomacy even though it is getting stronger after the end of the Cold War.

However, let's say that that was the greatest mistake in the 'Tokyo tribunal historical perspective' and it was a big mistake.

And the North - South divide on the Korean Peninsula, which is currently in progress, is originally, in the Yalta conflict, UK and the United States urged the Soviets to participate in the war with Japan.

As the Soviet troops invaded Manchuria stayed for more than a year, the Communist Party of China was based on Manchuria won through (Second) Chinese Civil War, they were able to establish the People's Republic of China.

If so, the Cold War of Asia including the division of the Korean Peninsula is like seeding by the United States and Britain.

The tragedies of Manchuria withdrawal and the redness of China are responsible not only for the Soviet Union but also for the United States and the UK, and all are ‘The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan" surrender: Feb. 11, 1945) ‘may be said.

Watanabe

All the weapons that the Kwantung Army of Manchuria had had passed to the Chinese Communist Party.

Nakanishi

At that time, it was clear that Chiang Kai - shek 's military arm of the Kuomintang who was cut off from the United States was defeated by the Communist troops

Thus, a communist country was born on the mainland of China and the Korean Peninsula was also negotiated by the Yalta talks under the trusteeship of allied countries including the Soviet Union.

However, the Soviets occupied the North from the 38th line, sent Kim Il Sung to establish North Korea (DPR Korea). In case

The tragedy of the inter-Korean division begins here, and its main reason is rather demanded by Anglo-Saxon allies of the United States and Britain.

At least, in the sense that it caused confusion in Northeast Asia, the United States and Britain and the Soviets should be regarded as ‘the same sin’.

Most importantly all Japanese should remember that the participation of the Soviets against Japan was done by unilaterally abandoning Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact.

It is a clear international law violation and the United States and Britain who gave Stalin to participate in Japan should be charged with the guilt and assistance of invasion war against Japan.

Since Stalin was originally a cowardly man, there is a high possibility that he would have hesitated to participate in the war against Japan unless Roosevelt or Churchill had a boost.

In that sense, the U.K. and U.K would just have helped the Soviet invasion against Japan.

As a result, the Soviets acquired Manchuria, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands that were under Japanese rule, and a storm of conflict due to the spread of communism spread throughout Asia throughout the postwar period.

In other words, it is necessary to see that all suffering over the cold war in postwar Asia was ‘responsibility of the Allied Powers as a whole’.

Watanabe

After that, the UK and the United States won the great war, but Poland eventually fell to the hands of Stalin.

The main point of ‘Hull Note’ was that Japan was withdrawing from China, but in the end, China was also communized.

This is the consequence of the contradiction of the Atlantic charter of appealing the worldwide construction of democracy while adding Soviets which are not democracies to their allies.

How was Roosevelt and Churchill's war guidance wrong?

However, most of British and American history books divert their attention from these facts. That is to ignore it.

It is because the evaluation ‘Roosevelt and Churchill is a great leader’ is crushed from the root.

Also, most of the Japanese history books are looking away from the result brought by the guidance of the two guys (Expansion of Communism) and are keen only to accuse the Japanese leader's stupidity at the same time.

It is extremely disappointing that there is no attitude to explore historical facts and causal relationship at that time from an international perspective.

This draft continues.

In that sense, the U.K. and U.K would just have helped the Soviet invasion against Japan

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In holding the Japan - Russia Summit Meeting in December 2016, I felt a sense of crisis that Japanese media launched a series of observation balloons such as 'two islands Preceded' and 'Coordinated Government' two Islands (preceding) Returning I issued a warning 'Those theory is nothing but theory of 2 Island abandonment of Kunashir and Iturup' (Issue 2016 12).

In conclusion, I appealed that Japan should first regain its historical awareness and secure the power to ‘stand as a country’ and then conduct full-blown negotiations on the Northern Territories issue.

That idea has not changed.

Cold war in Asia is like to be planted seeds by the United States and the UK

Watanabe

Speaking of territorial cuts, in the case of Germany it was more miserable than Japan.

It lost Eastern Prussia (East Prussia) and it was robbed of the territory to the Oder River, which is now the border with Poland.

Most of the exiled German residents headed to Berlin, but they had encountered plunder and rape of Soviet troops along the way, and none remained when they arrived in Berlin.

What was waiting there further is GI who inflated pocket with Allied Mark which the occupied country issued without permission.

In the paper of the National Archives of the United States of America, it is said that in 1946 as many as 500,000 German women had lived for prostitution.

Nakanishi

Because of the Second World War, in the case of Europe, a cruel territory change occurred more than any war of the past, which was fixed as the postwar European order.

In Japan, as well as the escape of hardships experienced by repatriates from continent such as Manchuria, hundreds of thousands of Japanese and German civilians, and millions of people were deprived of their lives in the process of their territorial change it was.

Although the history of this tragedy has been placed outside the field of view, even now in the former Allied Powers.

So, as for Germans, there is a sense that why the sticking to the 'small problem' of return of the Northern Territories, why they should not pursue as a responsibility for post-war processing of the Allies.

Watanabe

Furthermore, Japanese school education absolutely does not teach, it is destruction of German industrial infrastructure by US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau and agricultural plan, so-called ‘Morgenthau · plan’.

Before the defeat, Germany exported industrial products and used it for importing agricultural crops, but due to Morgenthau's ‘ridiculous plan’, it was transformed into an economic structure that depended on agriculture, resulting in direct hit of famine.

According to the Canadian historian James Buck's ‘Crimes and Mercies’, there are 5.7 million civilians in Germany plus 2.5 million German refugees who were excluded from Eastern Europe and returned to mainland Germany, 1.1 million war prisoners, more than 9 million people lost their lives with famine.

Regarding the rebuilding of the postwar Europe, there are descriptions of the Marshall plan when seeing Japanese textbooks, but we ignore the tragedy Morgenthau · plan originated.

It is important to describe not only the part of the light brought by the victorious country but also the part of the shadow in a balanced manner.

In that regard, I do not think Japan - US relations will get worse.

Nakanishi

The view of history and the order of the modern Japanese was made in the Cold War era, especially in Asia where the Soviets are 'evil', the United States and Britain are 'good', as in the Second World War, even in the Cold War, Justice has won 'only to' Empire of evil 'It is common understanding of history That the Imperial Japanese Empire and the Soviet Union collapsed naturally.

This ‘United States and Britain = Justice view of history’ continues to tie down Japanese diplomacy even though it is getting stronger after the end of the Cold War.

However, let's say that that was the greatest mistake in the 'Tokyo tribunal historical perspective' and it was a big mistake.

And the North - South divide on the Korean Peninsula, which is currently in progress, is originally, in the Yalta conflict, UK and the United States urged the Soviets to participate in the war with Japan.

As the Soviet troops invaded Manchuria stayed for more than a year, the Communist Party of China was based on Manchuria won through (Second) Chinese Civil War, they were able to establish the People's Republic of China.

If so, the Cold War of Asia including the division of the Korean Peninsula is like seeding by the United States and Britain.

The tragedies of Manchuria withdrawal and the redness of China are responsible not only for the Soviet Union but also for the United States and the UK, and all are ‘The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan" surrender: Feb. 11, 1945) ‘may be said.

Watanabe

All the weapons that the Kwantung Army of Manchuria had had passed to the Chinese Communist Party.

Nakanishi

At that time, it was clear that Chiang Kai - shek 's military arm of the Kuomintang who was cut off from the United States was defeated by the Communist troops

Thus, a communist country was born on the mainland of China and the Korean Peninsula was also negotiated by the Yalta talks under the trusteeship of allied countries including the Soviet Union.

However, the Soviets occupied the North from the 38th line, sent Kim Il Sung to establish North Korea (DPR Korea). In case

The tragedy of the inter-Korean division begins here, and its main reason is rather demanded by Anglo-Saxon allies of the United States and Britain.

At least, in the sense that it caused confusion in Northeast Asia, the United States and Britain and the Soviets should be regarded as ‘the same sin’.

Most importantly all Japanese should remember that the participation of the Soviets against Japan was done by unilaterally abandoning Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact.

It is a clear international law violation and the United States and Britain who gave Stalin to participate in Japan should be charged with the guilt and assistance of invasion war against Japan.

Since Stalin was originally a cowardly man, there is a high possibility that he would have hesitated to participate in the war against Japan unless Roosevelt or Churchill had a boost.

In that sense, the U.K. and U.K would just have helped the Soviet invasion against Japan.

As a result, the Soviets acquired Manchuria, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands that were under Japanese rule, and a storm of conflict due to the spread of communism spread throughout Asia throughout the postwar period.

In other words, it is necessary to see that all suffering over the cold war in postwar Asia was ‘responsibility of the Allied Powers as a whole’.

Watanabe

After that, the UK and the United States won the great war, but Poland eventually fell to the hands of Stalin.

The main point of ‘Hull Note’ was that Japan was withdrawing from China, but in the end, China was also communized.

This is the consequence of the contradiction of the Atlantic charter of appealing the worldwide construction of democracy while adding Soviets which are not democracies to their allies.

How was Roosevelt and Churchill's war guidance wrong?

However, most of British and American history books divert their attention from these facts. That is to ignore it.

It is because the evaluation ‘Roosevelt and Churchill is a great leader’ is crushed from the root.

Also, most of the Japanese history books are looking away from the result brought by the guidance of the two guys (Expansion of Communism) and are keen only to accuse the Japanese leader's stupidity at the same time.

It is extremely disappointing that there is no attitude to explore historical facts and causal relationship at that time from an international perspective.

This draft continues.

it is said that in 1946 as many as 500,000 German women had lived for prostitution.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In holding the Japan - Russia Summit Meeting in December 2016, I felt a sense of crisis that Japanese media launched a series of observation balloons such as 'two islands Preceded' and 'Coordinated Government' two Islands (preceding) Returning I issued a warning 'Those theory is nothing but theory of 2 Island abandonment of Kunashir and Iturup' (Issue 2016 12).

In conclusion, I appealed that Japan should first regain its historical awareness and secure the power to ‘stand as a country’ and then conduct full-blown negotiations on the Northern Territories issue.

That idea has not changed.

Cold war in Asia is like to be planted seeds by the United States and the UK

Watanabe

Speaking of territorial cuts, in the case of Germany it was more miserable than Japan.

It lost Eastern Prussia (East Prussia) and it was robbed of the territory to the Oder River, which is now the border with Poland.

Most of the exiled German residents headed to Berlin, but they had encountered plunder and rape of Soviet troops along the way, and none remained when they arrived in Berlin.

What was waiting there further is GI who inflated pocket with Allied Mark which the occupied country issued without permission.

In the paper of the National Archives of the United States of America, it is said that in 1946 as many as 500,000 German women had lived for prostitution.

Nakanishi

Because of the Second World War, in the case of Europe, a cruel territory change occurred more than any war of the past, which was fixed as the postwar European order.

In Japan, as well as the escape of hardships experienced by repatriates from continent such as Manchuria, hundreds of thousands of Japanese and German civilians, and millions of people were deprived of their lives in the process of their territorial change it was.

Although the history of this tragedy has been placed outside the field of view, even now in the former Allied Powers.

So, as for Germans, there is a sense that why the sticking to the 'small problem' of return of the Northern Territories, why they should not pursue as a responsibility for post-war processing of the Allies.

Watanabe

Furthermore, Japanese school education absolutely does not teach, it is destruction of German industrial infrastructure by US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau and agricultural plan, so-called ‘Morgenthau · plan’.

Before the defeat, Germany exported industrial products and used it for importing agricultural crops, but due to Morgenthau's ‘ridiculous plan’, it was transformed into an economic structure that depended on agriculture, resulting in direct hit of famine.

According to the Canadian historian James Buck's ‘Crimes and Mercies’, there are 5.7 million civilians in Germany plus 2.5 million German refugees who were excluded from Eastern Europe and returned to mainland Germany, 1.1 million war prisoners, more than 9 million people lost their lives with famine.

Regarding the rebuilding of the postwar Europe, there are descriptions of the Marshall plan when seeing Japanese textbooks, but we ignore the tragedy Morgenthau · plan originated.

It is important to describe not only the part of the light brought by the victorious country but also the part of the shadow in a balanced manner.

In that regard, I do not think Japan - US relations will get worse.

Nakanishi

The view of history and the order of the modern Japanese was made in the Cold War era, especially in Asia where the Soviets are 'evil', the United States and Britain are 'good', as in the Second World War, even in the Cold War, Justice has won 'only to' Empire of evil 'It is common understanding of history That the Imperial Japanese Empire and the Soviet Union collapsed naturally.

This ‘United States and Britain = Justice view of history’ continues to tie down Japanese diplomacy even though it is getting stronger after the end of the Cold War.

However, let's say that that was the greatest mistake in the 'Tokyo tribunal historical perspective' and it was a big mistake.

And the North - South divide on the Korean Peninsula, which is currently in progress, is originally, in the Yalta conflict, UK and the United States urged the Soviets to participate in the war with Japan.

As the Soviet troops invaded Manchuria stayed for more than a year, the Communist Party of China was based on Manchuria won through (Second) Chinese Civil War, they were able to establish the People's Republic of China.

If so, the Cold War of Asia including the division of the Korean Peninsula is like seeding by the United States and Britain.

The tragedies of Manchuria withdrawal and the redness of China are responsible not only for the Soviet Union but also for the United States and the UK, and all are ‘The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan" surrender: Feb. 11, 1945) ‘may be said.

Watanabe

All the weapons that the Kwantung Army of Manchuria had had passed to the Chinese Communist Party.

Nakanishi

At that time, it was clear that Chiang Kai - shek 's military arm of the Kuomintang who was cut off from the United States was defeated by the Communist troops

Thus, a communist country was born on the mainland of China and the Korean Peninsula was also negotiated by the Yalta talks under the trusteeship of allied countries including the Soviet Union.

However, the Soviets occupied the North from the 38th line, sent Kim Il Sung to establish North Korea (DPR Korea). In case

The tragedy of the inter-Korean division begins here, and its main reason is rather demanded by Anglo-Saxon allies of the United States and Britain.

At least, in the sense that it caused confusion in Northeast Asia, the United States and Britain and the Soviets should be regarded as ‘the same sin’.

Most importantly all Japanese should remember that the participation of the Soviets against Japan was done by unilaterally abandoning Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact.

It is a clear international law violation and the United States and Britain who gave Stalin to participate in Japan should be charged with the guilt and assistance of invasion war against Japan.

Since Stalin was originally a cowardly man, there is a high possibility that he would have hesitated to participate in the war against Japan unless Roosevelt or Churchill had a boost.

In that sense, the U.K. and U.K would just have helped the Soviet invasion against Japan.

As a result, the Soviets acquired Manchuria, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands that were under Japanese rule, and a storm of conflict due to the spread of communism spread throughout Asia throughout the postwar period.

In other words, it is necessary to see that all suffering over the cold war in postwar Asia was ‘responsibility of the Allied Powers as a whole’.

Watanabe

After that, the UK and the United States won the great war, but Poland eventually fell to the hands of Stalin.

The main point of ‘Hull Note’ was that Japan was withdrawing from China, but in the end, China was also communized.

This is the consequence of the contradiction of the Atlantic charter of appealing the worldwide construction of democracy while adding Soviets which are not democracies to their allies.

How was Roosevelt and Churchill's war guidance wrong?

However, most of British and American history books divert their attention from these facts. That is to ignore it.

It is because the evaluation ‘Roosevelt and Churchill is a great leader’ is crushed from the root.

Also, most of the Japanese history books are looking away from the result brought by the guidance of the two guys (Expansion of Communism) and are keen only to accuse the Japanese leader's stupidity at the same time.

It is extremely disappointing that there is no attitude to explore historical facts and causal relationship at that time from an international perspective.

This draft continues.

Cold war in Asia is like to be planted seeds by the United States and the UK

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

In holding the Japan - Russia Summit Meeting in December 2016, I felt a sense of crisis that Japanese media launched a series of observation balloons such as 'two islands Preceded' and 'Coordinated Government' two Islands (preceding) Returning I issued a warning 'Those theory is nothing but theory of 2 Island abandonment of Kunashir and Iturup' (Issue 2016 12).

In conclusion, I appealed that Japan should first regain its historical awareness and secure the power to ‘stand as a country’ and then conduct full-blown negotiations on the Northern Territories issue.

That idea has not changed.

Cold war in Asia is like to be planted seeds by the United States and the UK

Watanabe

Speaking of territorial cuts, in the case of Germany it was more miserable than Japan.

It lost Eastern Prussia (East Prussia) and it was robbed of the territory to the Oder River, which is now the border with Poland.

Most of the exiled German residents headed to Berlin, but they had encountered plunder and rape of Soviet troops along the way, and none remained when they arrived in Berlin.

What was waiting there further is GI who inflated pocket with Allied Mark which the occupied country issued without permission.

In the paper of the National Archives of the United States of America, it is said that in 1946 as many as 500,000 German women had lived for prostitution.

Nakanishi

Because of the Second World War, in the case of Europe, a cruel territory change occurred more than any war of the past, which was fixed as the postwar European order.

In Japan, as well as the escape of hardships experienced by repatriates from continent such as Manchuria, hundreds of thousands of Japanese and German civilians, and millions of people were deprived of their lives in the process of their territorial change it was.

Although the history of this tragedy has been placed outside the field of view, even now in the former Allied Powers.

So, as for Germans, there is a sense that why the sticking to the 'small problem' of return of the Northern Territories, why they should not pursue as a responsibility for post-war processing of the Allies.

Watanabe

Furthermore, Japanese school education absolutely does not teach, it is destruction of German industrial infrastructure by US Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau and agricultural plan, so-called ‘Morgenthau · plan’.

Before the defeat, Germany exported industrial products and used it for importing agricultural crops, but due to Morgenthau's ‘ridiculous plan’, it was transformed into an economic structure that depended on agriculture, resulting in direct hit of famine.

According to the Canadian historian James Buck's ‘Crimes and Mercies’, there are 5.7 million civilians in Germany plus 2.5 million German refugees who were excluded from Eastern Europe and returned to mainland Germany, 1.1 million war prisoners, more than 9 million people lost their lives with famine.

Regarding the rebuilding of the postwar Europe, there are descriptions of the Marshall plan when seeing Japanese textbooks, but we ignore the tragedy Morgenthau · plan originated.

It is important to describe not only the part of the light brought by the victorious country but also the part of the shadow in a balanced manner.

In that regard, I do not think Japan - US relations will get worse.

Nakanishi

The view of history and the order of the modern Japanese was made in the Cold War era, especially in Asia where the Soviets are 'evil', the United States and Britain are 'good', as in the Second World War, even in the Cold War, Justice has won 'only to' Empire of evil 'It is common understanding of history That the Imperial Japanese Empire and the Soviet Union collapsed naturally.

This ‘United States and Britain = Justice view of history’ continues to tie down Japanese diplomacy even though it is getting stronger after the end of the Cold War.

However, let's say that that was the greatest mistake in the 'Tokyo tribunal historical perspective' and it was a big mistake.

And the North - South divide on the Korean Peninsula, which is currently in progress, is originally, in the Yalta conflict, UK and the United States urged the Soviets to participate in the war with Japan.

As the Soviet troops invaded Manchuria stayed for more than a year, the Communist Party of China was based on Manchuria won through (Second) Chinese Civil War, they were able to establish the People's Republic of China.

If so, the Cold War of Asia including the division of the Korean Peninsula is like seeding by the United States and Britain.

The tragedies of Manchuria withdrawal and the redness of China are responsible not only for the Soviet Union but also for the United States and the UK, and all are ‘The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan" surrender: Feb. 11, 1945) ‘may be said.

Watanabe

All the weapons that the Kwantung Army of Manchuria had had passed to the Chinese Communist Party.

Nakanishi

At that time, it was clear that Chiang Kai - shek 's military arm of the Kuomintang who was cut off from the United States was defeated by the Communist troops

Thus, a communist country was born on the mainland of China and the Korean Peninsula was also negotiated by the Yalta talks under the trusteeship of allied countries including the Soviet Union.

However, the Soviets occupied the North from the 38th line, sent Kim Il Sung to establish North Korea (DPR Korea). In case

The tragedy of the inter-Korean division begins here, and its main reason is rather demanded by Anglo-Saxon allies of the United States and Britain.

At least, in the sense that it caused confusion in Northeast Asia, the United States and Britain and the Soviets should be regarded as ‘the same sin’.

Most importantly all Japanese should remember that the participation of the Soviets against Japan was done by unilaterally abandoning Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Pact.

It is a clear international law violation and the United States and Britain who gave Stalin to participate in Japan should be charged with the guilt and assistance of invasion war against Japan.

Since Stalin was originally a cowardly man, there is a high possibility that he would have hesitated to participate in the war against Japan unless Roosevelt or Churchill had a boost.

In that sense, the U.K. and U.K would just have helped the Soviet invasion against Japan.

As a result, the Soviets acquired Manchuria, Sakhalin and Kuril Islands that were under Japanese rule, and a storm of conflict due to the spread of communism spread throughout Asia throughout the postwar period.

In other words, it is necessary to see that all suffering over the cold war in postwar Asia was ‘responsibility of the Allied Powers as a whole’.

Watanabe

After that, the UK and the United States won the great war, but Poland eventually fell to the hands of Stalin.

The main point of ‘Hull Note’ was that Japan was withdrawing from China, but in the end, China was also communized.

This is the consequence of the contradiction of the Atlantic charter of appealing the worldwide construction of democracy while adding Soviets which are not democracies to their allies.

How was Roosevelt and Churchill's war guidance wrong?

However, most of British and American history books divert their attention from these facts. That is to ignore it.

It is because the evaluation ‘Roosevelt and Churchill is a great leader’ is crushed from the root.

Also, most of the Japanese history books are looking away from the result brought by the guidance of the two guys (Expansion of Communism) and are keen only to accuse the Japanese leader's stupidity at the same time.

It is extremely disappointing that there is no attitude to explore historical facts and causal relationship at that time from an international perspective.

This draft continues.

If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation,

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855)

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.

The Northern Territories are ‘Japan versus the Allies problem’

Watanabe 

At the Yalta talks, a sovereignty that was deprived by the aggression state and a statement calling for the recovery of autonomy were issued.

There is a provision ‘by the aggression state’ that the Soviets, which is a member of the Allies, is not an invasion state, it does not apply to countries that have been deprived of liberty by the Soviets.

The focus here is Polish treatment.

World War II began with the invasion of Polish independence that the British and France guarantee safety Nazis · Germany invaded.

At that time in London there was Polish exile, Britain guaranteed Poland's independence.

Therefore, Churchill had an obligation to protect the Polish asylum regime.

Meanwhile, Roosevelt also promises the country's free recovery to acquire votes of Polish voters in November 1944 elections.

However, at the time of the Yalta talks, a communist organization was already built in Poland by the Soviet boost.

Even more, Churchill and Roosevelt confirmed this situation.

It was because they had strong negatives because they recognized the communism not only in Poland but also in Eastern Europe without the help of the military force of the Soviet clearly recognizing that they could not win against Nazi · Germany. Nakanishi

During the Second World War, the Pacific Front was pressed by the overwhelming military power of the United States.

But at the European front, there was no victory of the allied without four years of death and Sacrifice with the Soviet Army against Nazi · Germany.

Indeed, in June 1944, after the Normandy landing campaign, the United States and British coalition forces opened a western fight and began advancing towards Germany, but the number of victims is lower than that of the deaths of the previous German Soviet match It is small enough to be no comparison at all.

Most of the German anti-warfare abilities were directed against the Soviet war, the East Front.

Watanabe

In the Second World War, the Soviets have indeed issued as many as 20 million dead.

The high number of victims would have been ‘psychological handicap’ in negotiations with Stalin for Roosevelt and Churchill too.

Nakanishi

From the two of them in the United States and Britain that were in the ability and position to see war on a global scale,

Because it was based on the essence of World War II as an imperialist war aimed at picking up interests,

They should have known that it is only possible to give the Soviets a corresponding 'takeover'.

In other words, while they know that both Poland and Eastern Europe are located a repressive communist regime, it means 'they gave it to Stalin'.

From this point the above-mentioned ‘policy of non-expansion’ in the Atlantic Charter was only propaganda for the Axis countries or their citizens.

In addition, what we should look back on today for Japanese,

The relationship between the Northern Territories issue and The Yalta Agreement (secret American-British-Soviet agreement and the Soviets agreed to attack Japan within three months of the German surrender: Feb. 11, 1945).

American historians have excused that ‘Roosevelt did not know the existence of Treaty of Commerce and Navigation between Japan and Russia (1855) and Treaty of Saint Petersburg (1875)’, but of course this is a lie is.

Of course, it is being fully aware of that the US State Department and Roosevelt as well as the Kuril Islands, especially the Northern Territories, are the territories unique to Japan, it means that they have ceded to the Soviets, they expanded the territory, which is the privilege of conquerors by the Allies.

As the basis for requesting the return of the Northern Territories as ‘It is unjustly occupied by Russia’, the Japanese government is based on the above-mentioned Atlantic Charter, which Roosevelt and Churchill called ‘territorial no expansion’.

But if you look closely at the movements of the U.S. and U.K. leaders during the Great War to the Yalta talks, remember that it is exactly this UK and the U.S. that created the Northern Territories issue.

In other words, the Northern Territories is not a matter between Japan and the Russo (Japan-Russia), but ‘Japan's vs. allied country problem’.

Watanabe

As you pointed out, the Northern Territories issue, which still plagues Japan today, is undoubtedly due to the stupidity of Roosevelt and Churchill's judgment at the Yalta talks.

To solve this problem, it will be the first step to recognize the failure of secret agreement at the Yalta talks.

However, that recognition also means the change of the conventional wartime historical view ('explanation view of history'), 'The UK and the US fought with totalitarian countries to protect democracy'.

Skeptically looking at the diplomacy advocated by Roosevelt and Churchill If history revisionism does not become mainstream of history interpretation, we cannot help thinking that it is difficult to solve the Northern Territories issue.

Nakanishi

In this respect, the Putin administration said that ‘the Northern Territories have become Russian territory as a result of the Allies' victory in World War II’, but this is a kind of real intention, historically from a more accurate perspective, it can be said that it is in line with the true ways of the war of the Second World War as a traditional ‘conquest war’ ....

Since the Northern Territories deprived Japan from the fundamental norm of international politics, the legitimate ‘game of rules’, there is no need to return.

If you are so inclined, ask the real intention of the United States or Britain, he is teaching Japanese people.

The United States and the United Kingdom have also expanded substantial territory at many strategic bases, including the islands of the Pacific, after the war as victorious countries in the Second World War.

In this respect ‘the Soviet Union and the birds of a feather’.

Of course, Japan must adhere to the position of returning the four islands in accordance with the principle ‘law and justice’ to the last, as a defeated country, continue to appeal return as a protest unfair postwar processing by the United States British Soviet Union.

This draft continues.