I indicated that the original positon was not necessary.
Secondly I claimed overlapping consensus was not necessary, which came back to philosophycal theory.
Thidly I demonstrated the fact of pluralism was the normative of Rawls's hope and conception.
by Ryohei ITABASHI
Secondly I claimed overlapping consensus was not necessary, which came back to philosophycal theory.
Thidly I demonstrated the fact of pluralism was the normative of Rawls's hope and conception.
by Ryohei ITABASHI
