Who Does Government Serve?

In Japan, Britain, France, perhaps Germany, the puppet of the American military security security complex is taking politics?

Is the US government puppet politics of the military security and security complex?

Where are the headquarters of weapons, global companies of hospitals and medicines?

 

 

Dictators are suspicious because of dictators.

Dictators will surely have doubts about their doctor.

Can a dictator trust a doctor when he gets sick?

The doctor is responsible for saving the lives of people and treating illness.

A doctor tells a dictator like this.

Do not war or kill anymore. Doctors do not do good to save the dictator's life.

If you stop dictators and democratically hear the opinions of citizens, let's treat it at that time.

A dictator orders a soldier.

Kill this doctor!

 

To avoid it, the dictator will brainwash if it is the doctor's duty to be a professional pursuit of a doctor.

A brainwashed doctor will tell the dictator.

I will not treat you!

A decent doctor from the country of America will escape.

It is a misfortune of American citizens.

I do not think it's a matter of money.

 

 

日本もイギリスもフランスも、たぶんドイツも、アメリカ軍産安保複合体の傀儡が政治を執っている？

アメリカ政府も軍産安保複合体の傀儡政治？

武器や医療や薬品のグローバル企業の本社はどこにある？

 

 

独裁者は独裁者が故に疑心暗鬼になる。

独裁者は必ず主治医に疑いを持つことになる。

独裁者が病気になったときに医者を信頼できるか？

医者は人々の命を救い病気を治療するのが役目だ。

医者が独裁者に対しこういう。

もう戦争や人殺しはいけません。医師はそういう命を救うことを善しとしません。

あなたが独裁者をやめて民主的に市民の意見を聞くならば、そのときに治療しましょう。

独裁者は部下に命令する。

この医者を殺してしまえ！

 

そうならないように独裁者は、医師を利潤追求こそが医師の務めだと洗脳するだろう。

アメリカという国からまともな医師は逃げ出すことになる。

アメリカ市民の不幸だ。

お金の問題ではないと思う。

 

February 14, 2019 | Categories: Articles & Columns | Tags: |  Print This Article

 

Who Does Government Serve?
Whose interests are served when Pelosi sells out health care and Pompeo sells out peace?

Paul Craig Roberts

The US health system is the most high cost and dysfunctional health care system in the world. The reason is that it is privatized. In the rest of Western civilization the system is socialized.

The reason health care is socialized in civilized countries is not only to provide health care to citizens who otherwise could not afford it, but also to reduce the cost. In a privatized system, a profit has to be turned at every level: the general practitioner, the specialist, the diagnostic facility, the ambulance service, the emergency room, the hospital, the hospice, the health insurance company. All of these levels of profit build up the cost.

In the hybrid system with which the US is afflicted, regulation drives the cost even higher. It is not only government regulation because of Medicare and Medicaid, but also private regulation imposed by private insurance companies. In America, alone in the world, medical care comes second to paperwork.

Doctors working in medical clinics have to dictate the results of each patient seen, the diagnosis, the treatment, and so forth, in sufficient detail to satisfy the payer of the bill, whether public or private. The dictation time eats into the doctor’s treatment time. In other words, the paper work requirements reduce the amount of time the doctor has to see patients. The paperwork also requires nurses to organize and compile it. And this is not the end of it.

Health care corporations employ people to monitor the doctors to make sure the physican dictates enough to create a record that Medicare, Medicaid, or the private insurance company will accept as evidence of billable service.

Even a libertarian economist who views the massive costs upon costs of the American system cannot find any economies to attribute to private enterprise.

In a socialized health care system, none of the many levels require a profit in order to continue to operate. As there is no billing of Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance companies by private corporations, there is no need for the high cost of preventing fraud. Nurses and doctors can attend to patients instead of paperwork. Of course, in any system cost-saving regulations can expand cost-producing bureaucracies, and no system will work well without moral and virtue rules that instill a compassionate and responsible attitude on the part of health care providers.

There is no doubt whatsoever that the cost of health care in the US would diminish dramatically if the US had a socialized health care system in which there is no profit, no paperwork, only health care. And this is why it will not happen.

In the US system, health care is profitable to private interests. They are concerned with their profits, not with the cost of health care to people. It is profitable to all the fraud prevention, public and private, bureaucracies. It is profitable to the members of the US Senate and House of Representatives, as private health care companies are major donors.

If you doubt this, consider that Democrats, or many of them, say that they are for a single payer health care system, by which they mean a socialized health care system in which there is no profit and no regulatory cost. But they are not really in favor of such a system as the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi’s health policy aide made clear to private insurance company executives. Pelosi’s health care adviser, Wendell Primus, pledged Democratic Party support to the insurance industry in the fight against single-payer health care. https://theintercept.com/2019/02/05/nancy-pelosi-medicare-for-all/?utm_source=The+Intercept+Newsletter&utm_campaign=0df09bdfa1-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_02_09&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_e00a5122d3-0df09bdfa1-131966649

Pelosi’s plan is to achieve “universal coverage” via the Obama Affordable Care Act. This misnamed legislation achieves health coverage for Americans by mandating that they purchase private insurance policies for their health insurance. Many Americans have not, because the premium, together with the deductible and co-pays are so high that few can afford to use the policy. The perfect deal for a health insurance company is to collect a premium on a policy whose deductibles and copays make it too expensive to use.

What we need to ask outselves is: Why can’t we Americans get affordable health care? A socialized system could pay high salaries to doctors and nurses to guarantee their commitment. Their education could be subsidized. Pharmaceutical companies can be nationalized. Scientists dedicated to finding cures don’t care who they work for. The entrepreneural argument is a red herring.

The answer is that government does not serve the citizens. Government is just another private business that serves those whose campaign contributions put senators, representatives, and presidents in office. What liberals, conservatives, and libertarians do not understand is that government is a private activity like a capitalist business, not a public organization.

Government is just another privatized sector. It serves those who pay. As people needing health care can seldom pay, the system is in the hands of the private insurance companies.
The only “health care reform” that America will ever have is the reform that drives the cost of healthcare even higher.

Pelosi’s sellout to the insurance companies is more evidence that the concept of “public goods,” that is, the government’s provision of goods and services to citizens, needs rethinking. For example, consider national defense. In what sense is the massive US military/security complex budget a public good as contrasted with taxpayer-provided profit to a small number of subsidy-seeking private corporations? In what sense does US foreign policy serve the public as opposed to the armaments corporations, oil companies, and Israel Lobby? It is impossible to look at the US government budget and not see that it feeds private interest groups with strong lobbies.

Consider the symbiotic relationship between foreign policy and the military/security budget. The massive Pentagon budget and the massive power of the CIA and NSA require a dangerous enemy. Thus, US foreign policy creates the “Russian threat,” the “Chinese threat,” the “Iranian threat,” the “Al Qaeda threat,” the “ISIS threat,” the “Saddam Hussein threat,” the “Gaddafi threat,” the “Assad threat,” and now the “Maduro threat.” In order to maximize profits, the military/security complex increases the risks of war. In other words, the profits come at an expense greater than the budget imposed on taxpayers. In the case of war with Russia, the cost is the destruction of life on earth.

Propaganda serves the same role in democracies as it does in dictatorships. The public have to be deceived in order for citizens to accept an agenda that serves others than themselves. The public’s patriotism and gullibility pave the way for propaganda’s success. Currently Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Adviser John Bolton are preparing the public for US military intervention in Venezuela with false claims that Cuba has taken control of Venezuela’s security apparatus, and Hezbollah and Iran have active cells operating in Venezuela. This alleged risk to America has “to be taken down” in Venezuela and “all across the globe.”
https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/70923/pompeo-attempts-to-link-iran-hezbollah-to-crisis-in.html

All over the Western world the public has been sold out by government; yet only in France is there effective protest.

 

Share this page

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/02/14/who-does-government-serve/