The following is from a paper by Koji Matsumoto published in the September issue of the monthly magazine WiLL titled 'Confront Korean lies. Why does Korea continue 'anti-Japan'? Detect historical truth, reveal Korean fiction.'
It is a must-read paper not only for Japanese citizens but also for people around the world.
Without reading this paper, the history of the Far East after the war is entirely unknown.
Alexis Dudden, a Korean agent, and incredibly low intelligence dominate the American Historical Society.
The same goes for the United Nations.
The time has come for the international community to be ashamed of knowing their ignorance and inefficiency.
Above all, there are South Korea and China, the land of abysmal evil and plausible lies.
In South Korea for 74 years after the war, China started Jiang Zemin to distract people from the Tiananmen incident.
The fact that the international community overlooked Nazism, called anti-Japanese education, has created a volatile and dangerous world.
China's grow impudent, South Korea's madness (Korean peninsula's madness), Putin's raise impudent, all of which result from the international community's continued neglect of Nazism that China and the Korean peninsula continue to do.
The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
'Is there no Japanese material?'
I don't know what it is now, but as far as I studied from the 1980s to the 90s, the legal book's text was very similar.
For example, let's compare the Japanese trade union law, which was revised in 1949, with the Korean trade union law created four years later in 1953.
◆ In this law, a labor union refers to an organization or its affiliated organization organized mainly to maintain and improve working conditions and voluntarily improve economic status. Under this law, a worker means a person who lives on wages, salary, or other similar income, regardless of their occupation. (Japan)
◆ Under this law, the labor union aims to unite voluntarily by workers, maintain and improve working conditions, improve workers' welfare, and improve economic and social status as an organization organized by or federation.
Under this law, a worker means a person who lives based on wages, salary, or other similar income, regardless of occupation type. (Korea) Korea is a little longer, but it is very similar.
Then, the Article 1 "Purpose" of the Japanese Law on Temporary Measures for the Promotion of Electronic Industry, enacted in 1957, and the Korean Law on Promotion of Electronic Industry, passed in 1969, are almost identical in their text.
◆ This law aims to contribute to the modernization of industrial equipment and technology and other healthy developments of the national economy by promoting the electronics industry. (Japan)
◆ This law aims to contribute to the modernization of industrial equipment and technology and the national economy's development by promoting the electronics industry. (Korea)
Not all articles can be cited, but in short, many Korean laws are like translations of Japanese laws. Such similarity cannot happen by chance.
As a practice, it often used the term 'Japanese material' in Korea.
When thinking about policies at the government office, when the draft comes up from below, the director asks, 'I understand it, but are there no Japanese materials?'
When planning and enacting new policies or laws, the above people always request Japanese materials.
If they follow that, they will be relieved.
When making something new, it was customary to send a survey team to Japan, investigate it, and become a new Korean policy or law.
In Korea, it transferred the Japanese rule laws from the late 1950s to the early 1960s.
'Transfer' is a legal term, which means that foreign law is regarded as the law of your home country and applied as it is. Of course, some young lawyers were not able to speak Japanese, so it translated them.
Since basic laws such as criminal law, civil law, and commercial law have been inherited since the Japanese rule, new Japanese legislation after World War II is well adapted to Korean society.
A Korean history textbook says, 'Japanese policies have had a huge hindrance to the modernization and development of Korea and have not helped our people.' you can see it is a perception that is completely separated from reality in this example.
President Park Chung-hee put an end to 'Transfer' and switched to Korea's law, but then Japanese law was inherited. 'Inherit' means to develop based on the customary law, and there were also regulations unique to Korea, such as adultery. Still, the legal structure of the Japanese rule is sliding as it is.
I think that it hasn't changed even now so much.
Perhaps the structure of towns and underground malls can be explained analytically by experts such as architecture and urban engineering that this part of Japan is incorporated in this way.
Why is it so similar to Japan even though it is an anti-Japan country?
It is not a form of inheritance or relics that have disappeared and has consistently tried to entrench Japan after the war.
Isn't it different from what you say in your mouth? Somewhere strange.
I felt there was something big that it didn't tell.
This article continues.
