I am re-disseminating the chapter that I sent out on October 30, 2020, titled "Su Zhiliang...Attending various UN-related committees as a representative of China.
This chapter clarifies why the Western (and arguably under Chinese and Korean manipulation) press labels Naoki Hyakuta, who is doing the best work of his time, as "right-wing" and other ridiculous labels.
The following is from Sakurai Yoshiko's official blog, which I saw online.
It's from https://yoshiko-sakurai.jp/2016/04/28/6348.
Ms. Yoshiko Sakurai is a "national treasure," as defined by Saicho.
She is also a supreme "national treasure."
One thing made sense to me for the first time after reading this genuine paper.
A few years ago, Haruki Murakami wrote a ridiculous article in his new book saying that the number of comfort women was 400,000.
Unlike Haruki Murakami's mind is made up of the editorials in the Asahi Shimbun newspaper, Naoki Hyakuta, a man of natural intelligence, vehemently refuted this.
What Haruki Murakami "heard" was, it seems, a story by Professor Su Zhiliang of Shanghai Normal University, in other words, Chinese propaganda.
What a man. What kind of Japanese is this Murakami Haruki?
The 400,000 Chinese Comfort Women Theory Spreading Around the World
Weekly Shincho, April 28, 2016
Japanese Renaissance #702
China's new anti-Japanese propaganda has begun to take hold.
They have produced documents to convince Western society that there were 400,000 comfort women, not 200,000 and that the real victims were Chinese comfort women.
＊When I learned of this fact, I realized again that China is a country of abysmal evil and plausible lies.＊
Shiro Takahashi, a professor at Meisei University, spoke on April 15 on the Internet-delivered "Discourse T.V." program.
Takahashi introduced an article published in the Chinese media on December 16, 2014, called FOCUS-ASIA.
In it, statistics from the Chinese Comfort Women's Research Center stated that "about 300,000 women, equivalent to the number of victims of the Nanking Massacre, died after being overrun by the Japanese military, which is 75 percent of the total number of victims.
If 300,000 women were killed, which is 75% of the total, the total number of comfort women would be 400,000.
'The overall number of 400,000, 300,000 dead, and 200,000 Chinese comfort women is a complete fiction and one of the pillars of the historical war against Japan. This fiction has been given an academic guise to lend credence to the earlier Chinese Comfort Women's Studies Center. The center is located at Shanghai Normal University, and its central figure is Professor Su Zhiliang. Dr. Su published a book in English called CHINESE COMFORT WOMEN in 2002. Since then, he has represented China on various UN-related committees.'
*Haruki Murakami played a role in the Chinese adulteration scheme; instead, he was probably a target of Chinese manipulation*.
It is still fresh in our minds that it inscribed the Nanking Massacre on UNESCO's Memory of the World list on October 10 last year.
The International Advisory Committee decided on the Registration, and Mr. Su also participated in that meeting as a representative of China.
His book, Chinese Comfort Women, is a collection of oral histories of twelve women.
After reading the book repeatedly, Mr. Takahashi found that its content is unsupported and uses unreliable hearsay in Japan, if any as if it were a significant piece of evidence.
Although the book is, in conclusion, completely unreliable, Takahashi says it is a means of escape.
The Rape Center.
'It says oral history, oral history collection. Even if there is a slight misremembering, it must have been calculated to be within acceptable limits. They cleverly touted these poor women's hardships, and Western society took it as a legitimate complaint! '
Su Chiliang's book is cloaked in the garb of authority in that its publisher is Oxford University.
There is a letter of recommendation from McDougall, one of the leading authorities on the comfort women issue, on the book's back cover.
Mr. McDougall was the author of the 1998 report on the comfort women issue as the U.N. Special Rapporteur.
Mr. McDougall's report, which followed Ms. Coomaraswamy's, was even more severe and emotional than the report by Ms. Coomaraswamy, referring to the comfort stations as 'rape centers.'
Mr. Takahashi pointed out.
In his endorsement of Su Zhiliang's book, McDougall wrote, 'It is deeply distressing to read the testimonies of Chinese women survivors who were brutally treated at Japanese comfort stations. But this story must be told and retold. It makes a tremendous contribution to understanding the victims of the terrible abuses that took place in Japanese military-controlled areas during World War II.'
After increasing his authority through Oxford University Press and the United Nations Special Rapporteur endorsement, Su Zhiliang made his presence known to the international community and appeared on CNN last December 31.
The program responded to the December 28 agreement between the Japanese and South Korean governments on comfort women.
Mr. Takahashi said he oversaw the program.
The program included a commentary by Su Zhiliang, a professor at Shanghai Normal University, which stressed that there were 400,000 comfort women in total, half of whom were Chinese and forced into prostitution without pay.
On January 3, the first day of the year, it reported an equally awful story in a local Canadian newspaper, the Ottawa Citizen.
Based on the 400,000 theory by Su Zhiliang and others, the number of comfort women is estimated at 410,000.
Many of the victims were girls between the ages of 14 and 18; the Japanese military's goal was virgins, it killed resisting family members in some cases, and there were only 46 survivors, which is bullshit.
The lies of China's historical war against Japan are spreading to North America via the English language media.
Essentially, the Japan-Korea agreement has nothing to do with Chinese comfort women, but China has undoubtedly brought Su Zhiliang to the world.
It is no secret that China is preparing to register comfort women with UNESCO's Memory of the World Programme, a follow-up to last year's Nanjing Massacre.
Can the Japanese government prevent this from happening?
The reality is chilling.
Six months have already passed since it inscribed the Nanjing Massacre on the list, and the Japanese government has only seen the inventory.
Even if Japan demands it, China has only produced the inventory.
The Memory of the World Programme aims to preserve necessary historical materials in a form that allows anyone to access them.
Nevertheless, China's action of only issuing a catalog after six months contradicts UNESCO's purpose.
*It reveals just how much China uses the U.N. as a propaganda tool for the CCP.
The reality is that the propaganda of China and South Korea is all there to it, and the truth is that it's a totalitarian state.
Or Left-Wing" Communism, which calls itself an NGO: An Infantile Disorder Patients, has also revealed the fact that they use the U.N.
The U.N. has proven to be such a corny, disgusting, and incompetent organization*.
Furthermore, the Nanjing case was reviewed by UNESCO's 14-member International Advisory Committee, of which none of them saw the documents.
The Sub-Committee conducted the substantive deliberations on Registration, a sub-organization of the International Advisory Committee, but only one of its members saw the documents submitted by China.
Again, Mr. Takahashi said, "There are no history experts in the subcommittee or the International Advisory Committee, the upper body, who have even the slightest knowledge of the Nanking incident. They are archivists," he said.
This article continues.
