The following is a continuation of the previous chapter.
In Chapter 1, we begin by explaining how corrupt American politics has become since the legalization of bribery between powerful industrial groups and giant corporations and politicians in the immediate aftermath of World War II.
Then, we will show how Donald Trump's victory in the presidential election in 2016, when the world was complete "all about money," was a huge upset.
In Chapter 2, the two significant policies of the Trump administration continued the struggle to overturn both the consensus between the Democratic liberals and the Republican conservative mainstream: the perpetual war to support military interests and the appeasement policy against China. Show that it was.
It also describes how the "inner circle" that controlled the world political economy, such as the World Economic Forum (Davos Conference) and the Council on Foreign Relations of the United States, cleverly tamed the major media, including newspapers and television.
At the end of the chapter, I also noted that although Trump had been consistent in his hard-line policy toward China, the selection of his final pardons during his presidency raised questions about whether he was really a "right-wing anti-war president.
In the end, perhaps we should appreciate that Trump was a clown who failed to become a tragic hero.
In Chapter 3, I wrote that the "1 percent versus 99 percent" economic disparity in the U.S. has become even more severe. Now, the top 0.1 percent of the 1 percent versus the remaining 0.9 percent are seriously divided along lines. I point out that a conflict has arisen.
Furthermore, unlike the giant oligopolies of manufacturing's heyday, modern Internet-based oligopolies such as Amazon, Facebook, and Google are not inevitably large to increase their efficiency and strengthen their advantage over their peers; instead are giant companies with fragile economic foundations.
Chapter 4 considers the implications of the fact that the current U.S. stock market is even more concentrated on the popularity of "high-tech" stocks than when the U.S. stock market collapsed spectacularly in 2000-02.
Spectacular bull markets have always ended in a massive crash due to an overconcentration of popularity in a particular sector.
There is no reason to think that this time alone will end differently.
The majority of today's popular high-tech stocks are a group of companies that, although they carry the sign of high-tech, are low-tech in practice.
And while consumers are happy to receive convenient services for free, the truth is that they are often operated by compiling big data on consumers and selling it to other companies and, in some cases, governments at high prices.
Robinhood, a fast-growing no-commission Internet stock brokerage firm, was caught and fined so much money that it was forced to pay a substantial fine because of its poor business practices.
The only difference is that Google and Facebook have not blatantly done it.
The "high-tech" giants, being fragile giants, try to protect their vested interests by tying up with the political powers of the moment and getting them to create a legal system favorable to their interests.
The politicians, who receive substantial lobbying fees, welcome this scheme.
In Chapter 5, we will solve the mystery of why politicians worldwide are competing with each other to implement as strong a lockdown as possible, even though lockdowns (city blockades and curfews) are largely ineffective and harmful a measure against the new coronas.
The answer is simple: what we, as consumers, see as harmful is desirable for those who dream of establishing a one-world government.
It is, for example, the inability to buy goods and services when and where we want them. Small, medium and micro-businesses with weak financial strength are increasingly dropping out of the market, leaving only chain stores run by significant capital.
The "disorderly and disorganized" market structure of small and micro businesses is a significant obstacle to controlling the consumer masses worldwide.
That is why they are implementing a "lockdown to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus" as an excuse to wipe out small and micro businesses from the market.
And in the final chapter, Chapter 6, we reveal that "zero carbon emissions to stop global warming" is also their original goal, even though it would be a waste of enormous capital investment funds from our point of view.
An economy in which a giant oligopoly of one-twist capital dominates consumption behavior in markets worldwide is the desired situation for them.
Chapter 6 also expands on the peculiar mentality of millionaires born after the 1960s, when Jeff Bezos, the founding CEO of Amazon, became the oldest person.
They have begun to wield power as an entirely different influential person from the old-style millionaires, such as Bill Gates and George Soros, who were explicitly greedy for power.
Unlike the old generation, which had the appearance of power-hungry older men, their outward appearance is calm.
However, despite their calm appearance, they do not even see the masses as objects to be persuaded by argument.
They see them as dupes to be preyed upon or as human beings to be used as pawns.
As a student at Harvard University, Mark Zuckerberg started the predecessor to Facebook as an Internet site for boys to screen girls and girls to screen boys and ask them out on dates.
Convinced that this would be good business, he solicited Internet addresses from students, teachers, and alumni.
When many Harvard people readily gave him their addresses without asking what they were using them for, he famously spat out, "Dump Facks.
However, it is not so well known why he started this online dating service.
When he asked a beautiful female student who was well known on campus for a date, he was elbowed in the face and told, "Who would date a nerd like you?
As revenge, he scattered her picture and e-mail address all over.
This insidious revenge was surprisingly well-received, and Zuckerberg launched an online dating service as an on-campus venture.
The new Biden administration will start with the full support of those convinced that, rather than this kind of self-centeredness, "everyone is on their own no matter how they take advantage of anyone but themselves," and who has made a fortune from this attitude. But, yes, readers may have thought I was talking about Trump, but the worst president ever is Joe Biden.
