As a result of the Opium War, Hong Kong's 99-year lease tied between the UK and Qing Dynasty

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
Meaning of promises among nations
International common sense is that it is not permissible to break treaties and conventions exchanged between states.
As stipulated in Article 27 of the Vienna Treaty Convention adopted by the United Nations that states cannot invoke domestic laws of their country as a basis for justifying the breach of the treaty (Article 27) It is strictly forbidden to tread over the obligation to comply with treaties, etc., by the law, that is, in the circumstances of their own country. 
As a result of the Opium War, Hong Kong's 99-year lease tied between the UK and Qing Dynasty also claimed that ‘It is ineffective because it was connected by losing the war’, afterwards both the Republic of China and the People's Republic of China Never, never did.
Japan never said that the Meiji government had signed the treaty of inequality, ‘That is invalid’, etc., raised national strength, negotiated repeatedly, and finally brought it to the revision at the end of sweat blood. 
Also, the Japanese archipelago was taken as a scorched land, the Japanese never said not whatever happens, which the Potsdam Declaration accepted at the end of dropping two atomic bombs 'That is invalid because it was accepted in a disastrous state'.
It is because Japan knows that the national promise is so heavy. 
That international common sense does not exist in Korea.
However, of all things, it is a political party in Japan ...,
Japan Communist Party's Chairman Kazuo Shii in December last year as a member of the Korea-Japan Federation, visited the president of Moon Jae-in, ‘The Japanese government has also officially announced that it will not extinguish individual claim rights of victims. Both governments agree on this point. In order to obtain a positive solution toward the recovery of the honor and dignity of the victims, cool discussion is important', he said. (By the report of ‘Shimbun Akahata’). 
It is unbelievable that Japanese political parties will support Korea, which is trying to reverse the conventions between nations, a Japan-Korea Claim Agreement that was the basis of Japan-Korea Basic Treaty.
This will be a thing that Japanese citizens must keep in mind as strict. 
It is not a few in Japan that believed in without evidence 'being moved forcibly', which is not a fact at all and had supported the issue of comfort women still seeking apologies.
In addition, young people who dreamed of the Japan Dream and responded to the company's ‘free recruitment’ pretending to be 'drafting worker', which have only six months since September 1944 prevailed in court,
Some political parties support it as mentioned above.
It is strange for me that there are Japanese politicians and person in the speech community that follow Korea, accusing Japan by saying black as white, white as black as not based on facts.
While being a Japanese, to support South Korea that overturn national promises and treaties regardless of facts ...,
What on earth are people with background?
And why are the opposition parties developing criticism of the regime so never speaking up to Korean tyranny? 
The Japanese should carefully think about that.
This draft continues.