The following is from the serial column of Masayuki Takayama, who brings the weekly Shincho released today to a successful conclusion.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the post-war world.
This article is the best of all.
A False Textbook
Forced to flee before the enemy, MacArthur's battle to retake Manila began on February 5, 1945.
The day before the battle, the Japanese had made a humanitarian offer.
It housed 3,700 British and American civilians on the old Santo Tomas University campus in northern Manila City.
It detained them as enemy civilians during Manila's occupation, and if urban warfare continues, it will catch them in the crossfire.
It held discussions between the two sides, and it evacuated the 65 Japanese guards to the rear, and it released the detainees.
When the city was down to just two battalions of Japanese troops and 700,000 locals, the U.S. military began firing tremendous gunfire the next day.
Prior to that, it dropped 7,000 tons of bombs on the Peleliu and Saipan captures, but far more bombs fell on Manila's city.
It reduced the city to rubble, it killed many civilians, and the Japanese military's resistance ended after two weeks.
It overran Manila.
The Japanese surrendered six months later on August 15.
On September 15, GHQ had Japanese newspapers write that "the Japanese army killed 100,000 civilians during the battle for Manila".
The Asahi Shimbun, which was sane at the time, said, "We have both living witnesses and prisoners of war, so why don't we verify that lie? Let's verify that lie." The paper was immediately ordered to cease publication.
The Asahi was allowed to become a dog of the U.S. to this day.
But GHQ's argument is still terrible.
The U.S. military had killed 400,000 locals half a century earlier and turned them into colonies.
I don't think they would have hesitated to bombard them with artillery this time, either.
When innocent civilians have died, they have blamed it squarely on the Japanese.
If they are right, two Japanese battalions fought fiercely against American troops and still raped and killed 10,000 civilians every day.
The lie is so evident that they recently admitted that 40% of them were killed by U.S. bombardment and discounted the rest to the point where they "slaughtered 60,000".
Quirino, the second post-war Chinese president, was also opposed to this discounting.
It killed his wife and children in U.S. military bombardment.
Come to think of it; he lost his family and property all because of the Japanese invasion.
His resentment ran deep.
He spread the rumor that a Japanese sniper had shot his wife and child to death and that his second daughter had been thrown up by a Japanese soldier and stabbed to death with a bayonet.
In 1948, when he was sworn in as president, he celebrated by having three Class B.C. war criminals tied to the Montemporpa executed.
The following year, Kilino thrust the Japanese government with an $8 billion demand for absurd reparations. When negotiations dragged on, in January 1951, he had fourteen prisoners on death row executed overnight.
If the Japanese side was reluctant to do so, he threatened to hang the remaining prisoners on death row one by one.
The U.S. responded to a typical Chinese approach by dispatching Dulles to stop the blackmail of the death penalty.
If the threats didn't work, there was no reason to keep war criminals around.
Quirino freed all B.C. class war criminals in 1953.
NHK's Seiichi Nakata turned this Unforgivable President into a glorified story of "President Quirino extends amnesty to treasonous war criminal who killed his wife and children" and played it on your NHK.
After the war, NHK continued to broadcast the GHQ's Japanese self-tormenting program, "The Truth is thus."
They also aired the story of Kirino.
It's impossible, to tell the truth now.
They thought, 'Let them fool us!'
Seventy years have passed since Nakata's lie.
The other day, the Asahi Shimbun reported on the front page of its evening edition that "Kirino's good news story will appear in a textbook for junior high school students at the Teikoku Shoin,"
Shinta Namima wrote the article.
A memorandum he attached to the article stated that it executed seventeen people before the pardon.
It does not say that Quirino ordered the executions and that he executed them as a card in negotiations with Japan.
If he wrote that, it wouldn't be a beautiful story.
Even Junji Ogushi, a professor at Shinshu University, is quoted as saying, "BC-class war criminals are evil sinners.
Ethnic Chinese ran the local war tribunals.
It sentenced Japanese generals who had not even been to Cebu Island to death for killing the island's residents.
What's wrong with them?
In the prisoners on death row: 'Don't give in to the threat of vast sums of money. We are willing to die for it.'
Their words remain, too.
Seventy years later, these professors and newspapers are still trying to falsify history.
It's a sad story.
This article also proves that he is the one and only journalist in the post-war world.
This article is the best of all.
A False Textbook
Forced to flee before the enemy, MacArthur's battle to retake Manila began on February 5, 1945.
The day before the battle, the Japanese had made a humanitarian offer.
It housed 3,700 British and American civilians on the old Santo Tomas University campus in northern Manila City.
It detained them as enemy civilians during Manila's occupation, and if urban warfare continues, it will catch them in the crossfire.
It held discussions between the two sides, and it evacuated the 65 Japanese guards to the rear, and it released the detainees.
When the city was down to just two battalions of Japanese troops and 700,000 locals, the U.S. military began firing tremendous gunfire the next day.
Prior to that, it dropped 7,000 tons of bombs on the Peleliu and Saipan captures, but far more bombs fell on Manila's city.
It reduced the city to rubble, it killed many civilians, and the Japanese military's resistance ended after two weeks.
It overran Manila.
The Japanese surrendered six months later on August 15.
On September 15, GHQ had Japanese newspapers write that "the Japanese army killed 100,000 civilians during the battle for Manila".
The Asahi Shimbun, which was sane at the time, said, "We have both living witnesses and prisoners of war, so why don't we verify that lie? Let's verify that lie." The paper was immediately ordered to cease publication.
The Asahi was allowed to become a dog of the U.S. to this day.
But GHQ's argument is still terrible.
The U.S. military had killed 400,000 locals half a century earlier and turned them into colonies.
I don't think they would have hesitated to bombard them with artillery this time, either.
When innocent civilians have died, they have blamed it squarely on the Japanese.
If they are right, two Japanese battalions fought fiercely against American troops and still raped and killed 10,000 civilians every day.
The lie is so evident that they recently admitted that 40% of them were killed by U.S. bombardment and discounted the rest to the point where they "slaughtered 60,000".
Quirino, the second post-war Chinese president, was also opposed to this discounting.
It killed his wife and children in U.S. military bombardment.
Come to think of it; he lost his family and property all because of the Japanese invasion.
His resentment ran deep.
He spread the rumor that a Japanese sniper had shot his wife and child to death and that his second daughter had been thrown up by a Japanese soldier and stabbed to death with a bayonet.
In 1948, when he was sworn in as president, he celebrated by having three Class B.C. war criminals tied to the Montemporpa executed.
The following year, Kilino thrust the Japanese government with an $8 billion demand for absurd reparations. When negotiations dragged on, in January 1951, he had fourteen prisoners on death row executed overnight.
If the Japanese side was reluctant to do so, he threatened to hang the remaining prisoners on death row one by one.
The U.S. responded to a typical Chinese approach by dispatching Dulles to stop the blackmail of the death penalty.
If the threats didn't work, there was no reason to keep war criminals around.
Quirino freed all B.C. class war criminals in 1953.
NHK's Seiichi Nakata turned this Unforgivable President into a glorified story of "President Quirino extends amnesty to treasonous war criminal who killed his wife and children" and played it on your NHK.
After the war, NHK continued to broadcast the GHQ's Japanese self-tormenting program, "The Truth is thus."
They also aired the story of Kirino.
It's impossible, to tell the truth now.
They thought, 'Let them fool us!'
Seventy years have passed since Nakata's lie.
The other day, the Asahi Shimbun reported on the front page of its evening edition that "Kirino's good news story will appear in a textbook for junior high school students at the Teikoku Shoin,"
Shinta Namima wrote the article.
A memorandum he attached to the article stated that it executed seventeen people before the pardon.
It does not say that Quirino ordered the executions and that he executed them as a card in negotiations with Japan.
If he wrote that, it wouldn't be a beautiful story.
Even Junji Ogushi, a professor at Shinshu University, is quoted as saying, "BC-class war criminals are evil sinners.
Ethnic Chinese ran the local war tribunals.
It sentenced Japanese generals who had not even been to Cebu Island to death for killing the island's residents.
What's wrong with them?
In the prisoners on death row: 'Don't give in to the threat of vast sums of money. We are willing to die for it.'
Their words remain, too.
Seventy years later, these professors and newspapers are still trying to falsify history.
It's a sad story.
