So I keep calling it Wuhan fever with conviction.

The following is a continuation of the paper by Aoyama Shigeharu, a member of the House of Councilors, a writer, a visiting professor at Kinki University, and a lecturer at the University of Tokyo Free Research Seminar, published in the monthly magazine Hanada, a must-read for people from all over the world, not just Japanese.
Continue to call it Wuhan fever with conviction
Unconfirmed information is that the processing of the remains of experimental animals used at the Wuhan Disease and Toxicological Laboratory has been outsourced to a contractor, and low-income earners handle the actual disposal. There is information that it may have been sold as wild meat.
Please do not misunderstand. 
It is just unconfirmed information. 
It's just speculation.
At the same time, rats, snakes, Masked palm civet, bats, rabbits, and foxes have been eaten as valuable protein sources not only in Wuhan but also in the interior of China for over 1000 years in some places. There is evidence that pathogens such as the virus did not seem to have emerged and spread.
The informal explanation, 'Is the virus out of the wild game market?' Asks the question, 'Why now?'
Also, those mentioned above (1) The difference in incubation period is strangely large (2) there is a threat that exploits the characteristics of existing viruses for one's own advantage.
This mystery is easy to explain if it were caused by accident described above.
Omitting
After that, I named this virus "Wuhan fever" first and worked.
Why.
I believe that the crisis was created by China's current idiosyncratic dictatorship, which is free of prejudice and discrimination.
It is an objective and essential risk hedging for the expert (preventing unwanted elements of future concern).
As mentioned earlier, I expected that the WHO would be named in such a way as to obliterate it as a Chinese virus in the future.
As expected, it was made a name not to understand the essence or anything of COVID19 any more.
The dictatorship that Xi Jinping chairman is rush to change to the Constitution is not an ordinary dictatorship also for the Chinese Communist Party.
A dictatorship is imitating the Mao Zedong chairman.
Mao Zedong was an unusual dictatorship that killed tens of millions of his people using children who gave rise to the Cultural Revolution and gave them the name of the Red Guard to regain their own power. The number of dead was still uncertain.
Xi chairman has not cultivated the Cultural Revolution but has buried all his political opponents in the name of corrupt purge members.
The fact that the mayor of Wuhan was afraid of this center and did not report the truth of the Wuhan fever was not merely a matter of the mayor's character. Still, it was the responsibility of the Xi system that made yes-man the mayor in the first place.
Moreover, it is not the responsibility of Xi chairman alone, but rather the matter of the Chinese Communist Party's system that still has a transfigured giant face of Mao Zedong on Tiananmen Square.
What if Prime Minister Abe killed even one person in Japan?
It is the Wuhan fever virus if dealt with at the time of its outbreak, would never have caused the world to suffer so much.
This time, obfuscating China's peculiar responsibilities will force its descendants to face a new virus threat again.
So I keep calling it Wuhan fever with conviction.
It was the essence of crisis management that he continued to speak at the Liberal Democratic Party's House of Representatives and at the party's headquarters in hopes of reaching the government.
It is not about managing the crisis.
You lose if you shrink yourself, whether it's an infectious disease or terrorism.
Management is a way to stay ahead.
When I first entered Jerusalem, I stayed at the hospice in the old town where the Lord carried the cross and learned that no terrorism took place here.
Conversely, as I walked through the new town, I saw the blood that could not be wiped down on the floor of any restaurant.
The restaurant is full every night.
The Israeli people told me, "I can't afford to eat at home or go out in the old town alone."
I listen to the Palestinians.
We are not defending Israel.
It is not the only factor in reducing terrorism.
But that's one of the reasons.
This article continues.