おすすめブログ
@goo_blog
You cannot explane Michelson-Morley's experiment if you assume Schwarzshild metric
which is not isotropic in the solor system.
For the orbit of light,
c2(1-a/r)(dt)2-(1-a/r)-1(dr)2-r²(dθ)²-r²sin²θ(dφ)²=0.
For the ray from the sun, dθ=dφ=0.
c2(1-a/r)(dt)2-(1-a/r)-1)(dr)2=0. For the light velocity c1, (c1)2=(dr)2/(dt)2=c2(1-a/r)2.
For the ray which is perpendicular to the above ray,
dr=0. c2(1-a/r)(dt)2-r2(dθ)2-r2sin2θ(dφ)2=0.
For the light velocity c2, (c2)2=(r2(dθ)2+r2sin2θ(dφ)2)/(dt)2=c2(1-a/r).
(c2)2-(c1)2=c2(1-a/r)a/r≠0. This difference must be obserbed. The fact is not so.
Students of general relativity must admit Copenhagen interpretation. You have obserbed
Minkowski metric for Michelson-Morley's experiment and have observed Schwarzshild
metric for observation of the orbit of the planets. The metrics don't exist from the first
without observation.
Hilbert's equation Rμν=0 is common to any obserbers and does not includes quantity
decided by observation. (1993)
which is not isotropic in the solor system.
For the orbit of light,
c2(1-a/r)(dt)2-(1-a/r)-1(dr)2-r²(dθ)²-r²sin²θ(dφ)²=0.
For the ray from the sun, dθ=dφ=0.
c2(1-a/r)(dt)2-(1-a/r)-1)(dr)2=0. For the light velocity c1, (c1)2=(dr)2/(dt)2=c2(1-a/r)2.
For the ray which is perpendicular to the above ray,
dr=0. c2(1-a/r)(dt)2-r2(dθ)2-r2sin2θ(dφ)2=0.
For the light velocity c2, (c2)2=(r2(dθ)2+r2sin2θ(dφ)2)/(dt)2=c2(1-a/r).
(c2)2-(c1)2=c2(1-a/r)a/r≠0. This difference must be obserbed. The fact is not so.
Students of general relativity must admit Copenhagen interpretation. You have obserbed
Minkowski metric for Michelson-Morley's experiment and have observed Schwarzshild
metric for observation of the orbit of the planets. The metrics don't exist from the first
without observation.
Hilbert's equation Rμν=0 is common to any obserbers and does not includes quantity
decided by observation. (1993)