琉球國臨時政府／Ryukyu Country provisional government／류큐 국 임시 정부さんがCounter Current Newsさんの動画をシェアしました。
5分前 ·
https://www.facebook.com/motomura.yasuhiko/posts/1349520861783355
寛彦（KuanYan）本村安彦
“美國和美國的盟友是”粗俗的“。” 圍繞敘利亞和中東地區的問題被用盡了一個字，就是“惡”。（“美国和美国的盟友是”粗俗的“。” 围绕叙利亚和中东地区的问题被用尽了一个字，就是“恶”。）“美國和盟國的美國，”低“”。這敘利亞以及圍繞中東問題歸結為“”低“”一個字。（“美国和盟国的美国，”低“”。这叙利亚以及围绕中东问题归结为“”低“”一个字。）／"The allies of the United States and the United States are" vulgar "." The problem surrounding Syria and the Middle East is exhausted as one word of "vile".／«Союзники Соединенных Штатов и Соединенных Штатов« вульгарны »». Проблема, связанная с Сирией и Ближним Востоком, исчерпана как одно из слов «мерзкого».（«Соединенные Штаты и Соединенные Штаты союзников,» кроткий «». Это Сирия и вопросы, связанные с Ближним Востоком сводятся к одному слову «» кротким «».）／"미국과 미국의 동맹국은"미천 한 "" 이 시리아와 중동을 둘러싼 문제는 ""미천 한 ""의 한마디.（"미국과 미국의 동맹국은"저속하다 " 시리아와 중동을 둘러싼 문제는 '사악한'한 단어로 고갈되고있다）／"Các đồng minh của Hoa Kỳ và Hoa Kỳ là" thô tục "." Vấn đề xung quanh Syria và Trung Đông đã cạn kiệt như một từ "vô nghĩa".（"Hoa Kỳ và Hoa Kỳ đồng minh," tầm thường "". Đây Syria và các vấn đề xung quanh khu vực Trung Đông đi xuống đến một lời "" tầm thường "".）／"Ang mga kaalyado ng Estados Unidos at ang Estados Unidos ay" bulgar "." Ang problema na pumapalibot Syria at ang Gitnang Silangan naubos na bilang isang salita ng "kasuklam-suklam".（"Estados Unidos at ang Estados Unidos ng mga kaalyado," bulgar "". Ito Syria at mga isyu na pumapalibot sa Gitnang Silangan ay dumating down sa isang salita ng "" bulgar "".）／
"الولايات المتحدة والولايات المتحدة من حلفائها،" المتواضع "". هذه سوريا والقضايا المحيطة الشرق الأوسط يأتي الى كلمة واحدة من "" المتواضع "".
（
واضاف "ان حلفاء الولايات المتحدة والولايات المتحدة" مبتذلة ". إن المشكلة المحيطة بسوريا والشرق الأوسط تستنفد ككلمة واحدة "خبيثة".
）
／／／「米国と米国の同盟国は、”卑しい”」。このシリアや中東を巡る問題は「”卑しい”」の一言に尽きる。
從反媒體
＞＞如果您是美國或美國盟友，化學武器顯然可以用於平民（如果您是美国或美国盟友，化学武器显然可以用于平民。）如果你是美國公民或國家的美國盟友，你們認為美國是使用化學武器對平民顯然是OK。（如果你是美国公民或国家的美国盟友，你们认为美国是使用化学武器对平民显然是OK。）／From The Anti Media
＞＞Chemical weapons are apparently OK to use on civilians if you are the US or US allies／От Антивируса
＞＞Химическое оружие, по-видимому, нормально использовать для гражданских лиц, если вы являетесь союзниками США или США（Если вы человек, США или американские союзники нации, вы, ребята, что Соединенные Штаты использовать химическое оружие против мирных жителей, по-видимому ОК.）／안티 미디어보다
＞＞만약 당신이 미국인이나 미국의 동맹국의 국민이라면 미국이 민간인에 화학 무기를 사용하게 당신들은 분명히 OK입니다.（화학 무기는 미국이나 미국의 동맹국이라면 민간인에게 사용하는 것이 좋습니다.）／Từ The Anti Media
＞＞Vũ khí hóa học dường như là OK để sử dụng cho thường dân nếu bạn là đồng minh Mỹ hoặc Hoa Kỳ（Nếu bạn là một người Mỹ hoặc các đồng minh Mỹ của dân tộc, các bạn rằng Hoa Kỳ là sử dụng vũ khí hóa học chống lại dân thường là rõ ràng OK.）／Mula sa The Anti Media
＞＞Chemical armas ay tila ang OK upang gamitin sa mga sibilyan kung ikaw ay sa US o US mga kaalyado（Kung ikaw ay isang US tao o US mga kaalyado ng bansa, ka guys na ang Estados Unidos ay ang paggamit ng mga armas kemikal laban sa populasyong sibil ay tila OK.）／من مكافحة وسائل الإعلام
＞＞
إذا كنت الشخص الأمريكي أو حلفاء الولايات المتحدة للأمة، يا رفاق أن الولايات المتحدة لاستخدام الأسلحة الكيميائية ضد المدنيين على ما يبدو موافق.
（
الأسلحة الكيميائية على ما يبدو موافق على استخدامها على المدنيين إذا كنت الولايات المتحدة أو حلفاء الولايات المتحدة
）／／／／／アンチメディアより
＞＞もしあなたが米国人または米国の同盟国の国民ならば、米国が民間人に対して化学兵器を使用することにあなた達は明らかにOKです。
http://countercurrentnews.com/2017/06/us-backed-forces-enter-raqqa-as-coalition-drops-white-phosphorus-bombs/
＞＞Counter Current News
＞＞6月12日 11:30 ·
https://www.facebook.com/countercurrentnews/videos/1094481590696620/?fref=mentions
..
＞＞Chemical weapons are apparently OK to use on civilians if you are the US or US allies
＞＞Follow >> (y) Counter Current News for the latest
Read more here: https://goo.gl/fm43Ll
http://countercurrentnews.com/2017/06/us-backed-forces-enter-raqqa-as-coalition-drops-white-phosphorus-bombs/
US-Backed Forces Enter Raqqa as Coalition Drops White Phosphorus Bombs
News
June 9, 2017 12:52 am
Update: Footage published on Al-Masdar News moments ago appears to show white phosphorus or cluster bombs falling over Raqqa, which are both banned internationally if used on residential areas.
In what some speculate may be the beginning of the end for Daesh (ISIS), the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) entered Raqqa – Daesh’s Syrian stronghold – for the first time on Tuesday. SDF commander Rojda Felat told the AFP news agency that the group is “fighting street battles inside Raqqa now, and we have experience in urban warfare.” The advance came after heavy airstrikes by the U.S.-led coalition, which killed more than 20 civilians trying to flee the offensive by boat.
（写真US-White Phosphorus Bombs）
Julian Röpcke
✔ @JulianRoepcke
#BRK
This #ISIS video shows what is raining down on #Raqqa tonight.
Not only on the terrorists, but also on 1000s of stuck women & children.
6:24 AM - 9 Jun 2017
249 249 Retweets
102 102 likes
Airwars @airwars
Why we need to pay attention to Raqqa. In May alone, we tracked a minimum of 220 likely civilian deaths around city http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/isis-raqqa-syria-campaign-begins-civilian-casualties-air-strikes-mosul-iraq-a7775896.html …
11:14 PM - 7 Jun 2017
Photo published for Fears for civilians caught up in US-led air strikes are growing as Raqqa assault begins
（写真Why we need ）
Fears for civilians caught up in US-led air strikes are growing as Raqqa assault begins
At least 21 civilians have reportedly died fleeing intense US-led bombing and artillery fire as the battle for the capital of Isis’s so-called caliphate finally begins.
independent.co.uk
The push for the U.S.-backed SDF to claim Raqqa from Daesh has been in the works for over seven months, having only been made possible by U.S.-led coalition air support, thousands of military advisers and deliveries of heavy weapons. While the U.S.-led coalition, particularly the U.S. itself, claims that this support is all for the common cause of eradicating Daesh, their plans for Raqqa following a Daesh defeat could make the future goal of a united Syria all but impossible to achieve.
In April, the SDF announced that they would give control of post-Daesh Raqqa to a “civilian council” instead of the Syrian government. This council would be supported by more than 3,000 U.S. ground troops. General Joseph Votel – the head of U.S. Central Command – stated that these ground troops would stay in Raqqa long after a Daesh defeat in order to help “America’s allies” stabilize the region and aid them in establishing “Syrian-led peacekeeping efforts.” In other words, U.S. ground forces will support U.S.-backed opposition forces in establishing what would essentially be an independent state within Syria.
There is little chance that the Syrian government, led by President Bashar al-Assad, and its allies will allow this to happen, suggesting that the possibility of the Syrian conflict spilling beyond the country’s borders will come after Daesh’s defeat in Raqqa. However, recent events suggest that this may happen even sooner.
Pro-government forces are also actively fighting Daesh within the Raqqa province and the U.S. already bombed other pro-government forces directly when they entered a deconfliction zone around a facility where U.S. military advisers are training SDF troops in al Tanf. According to a statement from U.S. Central Command, “the Coalition destroyed additional pro-Syrian regime forces that advanced inside the well-established deconfliction zone in southern Syria.”
However, the Syrian and Russian governments do not recognize those deconfliction zones established without Syrian government approval, especially those unilaterally set up within Syria by the U.S. Essentially, the U.S. is now setting up deconfliction zones in order to criminalize the presence of Syrian forces in order to protect the independent state it seeks create. Now, a military alliance fighting in support of Assad said it may target U.S. positions in Syria, warning that its “self-restraint” regarding U.S. airstrikes on government forces will end if Washington crosses “red lines.”
A divided Syria – separated by sectarianism
The endgame here is clearly the eventual division of Syria. The U.S. plan to partition Syria is nothing new and was touted numerous times by former Secretary of State John Kerry, along with journalists and prominent U.S. academics, as the “necessary” solution to the Syrian conflict. According to this plan, Syria would be divided along sectarian lines, with autonomous regions created for Alawites, the Druze/Christians, Kurds and Sunni Muslims.
（写真US strike on Syrian ）
Russian Embassy, UK2認証済みアカウント
@RussianEmbassy
https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy
MFA: US strike on Syrian army in de-escalation zone is unacceptable
https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy/status/872461397262610433/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcountercurrentnews.com%2F2017%2F06%2Fus-backed-forces-enter-raqqa-as-coalition-drops-white-phosphorus-bombs%2F
james spencer
@elgae669
返信先: @RussianEmbassyさん
As they are finding it difficult to overthrow Syria directly, they are now trying to partition the Country.
https://twitter.com/elgae669/status/872465583568302080?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcountercurrentnews.com%2F2017%2F06%2Fus-backed-forces-enter-raqqa-as-coalition-drops-white-phosphorus-bombs%2F
https://twitter.com/RussianEmbassy?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fcountercurrentnews.com%2F2017%2F06%2Fus-backed-forces-enter-raqqa-as-coalition-drops-white-phosphorus-bombs%2F
Steffan Wyn-Jones
@swjiwji
Partition is Becoming Legitimate: Al-Ghab Fences to Normalize Territory Division in Syria
（写真Partition is Becoming）
Partition is Becoming Legitimate: Al-Ghab Fences to Normalize Territory Division in Syria
http://english.enabbaladi.net/archives/2017/05/partition-becoming-legitimate-al-ghab-fences-normalize-territory-division-syria/
https://twitter.com/swjiwji
The plan, which was not drafted by the Syrians, would allow the U.S. to draw dividing lines across the entire nation and redistribute key oil and gas resources within Syria to the sectarian group of its choosing. In addition, the plan would give the majority of Syrian territory to Sunni Muslims, a region that would likely be governed by a “council” comprising U.S.-backed Sunni militant groups, nearly all of which have the stated intention of creating a radical Wahhabi theocracy that would likely end up waging new conflicts with the other autonomous regions.
Partition-style “nation-building” is not a new tactic, having previously been used by Western imperial powers in Africa to weaken the continent through the use of internal conflict caused by manufactured sectarianism and subsequently making Africa’s rich resources more exploitable. Syria is no exception, as the conflict itself, far from being a “revolution,” has been about weakening Syria and dividing it along sectarian lines to make its own oil and gas reserves – as well as its strategic position – more exploitable.
The same occurred in Iraq and Libya, where sectarianism was manufactured after U.S.-led invasions. Plans for their partitioning have also been proposed. Indeed, Syria is symptomatic of the Western and Zionist neo-colonial plan to restructure the entire Middle East, with nations that have long championed secularism bound to suffer as a result.
To accomplish this plan, the U.S. must first weaken Assad. The situation in Raqqa may provide the justification by allowing the U.S. government to argue that U.S. troops in the area are in danger, regardless of the fact that their presence there is technically illegal. This reasoning has been used by the U.S. before to justify unilateral invasions or coups in other nations. Perhaps the removal of Daesh from Raqqa will trigger the “final phase” of the Syrian conflict, as has been suggested – and it could easily prove to be the most dangerous phase yet.
From The Anti Media
＞＞Dawn SylviaさんがMichael John Sumさんの投稿をシェアしました。
＞＞昨日 4:25
..
＞＞Michael John SumさんがCounter Current Newsさんの動画をシェアしました。
6月12日 14:23
https://www.facebook.com/countercurrentnews/videos/1094481590696620/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/UScrime/permalink/1258239120971283/
