goo blog　サービス終了のお知らせ　

カトリック情報

katorikku jyohou

でも、この人には退任してほしい、でも、そうなると次はもっとやばい　←「バチカンに巣食う頑迷右派VS世間常識的民衆の改革派」というのは左派の作ったシナリオ図式だよ

2020-01-15 | F1　フランシス一世

https://spinou.exblog.jp/30667401/

それでも、「ドイツ人教皇」には限界があり、ヴァティカンの壁は厚かった。

不器用な「失言」が取りざたされ、頑迷な守旧派だと見なされることもあった。

フランシスコ教皇はカトリック右派から攻撃されまくるくらいに、それを敢行した。

カトリック右派の攻撃に屈したからではない。

昨年末には、信頼して後を託せる人として、福音宣教省の新長官に、マニラ大司教のタグレ枢機卿を任命した。ヨーロッパの司教でもなく、アメリカ大陸の司教ですらなく、アジアのフィリピンの大司教だ。

1991 年のアメリカでのタグレ師の神学博士論文のテーマは、第二ヴァティカン公会議の精神と共振する「司教による合議制」の概念についてのものだった。

カトリックのような巨大な機構は、ヴァティカンのような一極的な集権ではもはや正常に維持できない、合議的なシステムが必要だというのは「改革派」のテーマであり続けた。

タグレ師は、1997年に、まさにラッツィンガ―のもとで国際神学委員会のメンバーに選出されている。その後フィリピンに戻り、ヨハネ＝パウロ二世から司教に、ベネディクト16世となったラッツィンガーからマニラ大司教に叙階された。

 ポーランド人、ドイツ人、アルゼンチン人の歴代教皇から信頼されてきたタグレ師が、赤衣の教皇という異名を持つ福音宣教省長官となったわけで、ヴァティカンの改革路線が固まってきたことのシンボルでもある。


「伝統は静的なものではなく動的なものである」は代々断罪されてきた異端言説

2020-01-01 | F1　フランシス一世

He made clear that his reform of the Curia “never had the presumption of being done as if nothing existed before. On the contrary, it has aimed to valorize all that is good that has been done in the complex history of the church.” But, he said, “to appeal to memory does not mean to anchor oneself in self-conservation…. Memory is not static, it is dynamic. By nature, it implies movement. Tradition is not static, it is dynamic. It is the guarantee of the future, not the custodian of ashes.”

https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2019/12/21/pope-francis-tells-roman-curia-do-not-fear-change-it-nature-missionary-church

Anyone who stands against Bergoglio's plans to turn Newchurch into an anti-Catholic secular institution directed toward the goals of Marxism and even Communism, he told the Newroman Curial officials on December 21, 2019, is "mentally deranged." He capped his statements with outright heresy: "Tradition is not static, it is dynamic." This is a classic expression of the Modernist heresy, which was condemned outright by Pope Pius IX, Pope Leo XIII, and especially Pope St. Pius X, who denounced it as "summa omnium heresum," the synthesis of all heresies and excommunicated from the Catholic Church those clergy who taught such heresy.


f1　聖母が共贖者と称されたことなんて決してない。ノー。そんなのバカげてる。ナンセンス。←こういう発言をごまんとしてる人の来日集会に行くなんてバカげてる。ナンセンス。

2019-12-14 | F1　フランシス一世

In his homily for the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe, Jorge Bergoglio (stage name,”Francis”) made news by saying of the Blessed Virgin, “She never introduced herself as co-redemptrix. No. Disciple,”

He went on to provide the headline that seems to be getting the most play this morning when he labeled  efforts to dogmatically define Mary as Co-Redemptrix “nonsense,” or otherwise translated from the Spanish as “foolishness.”

This from the man who treats all dogma as if it precisely that! Not that Jorge puts any stock in such things, but…

The title “Co-Redemtprix” was first employed by the Holy See in reference to Our Lady during the reign of Pope St. Pius X. She was directly invoked under this title by Pope Pius XI, first in 1933, and again in 1935. Even the Great Ecumenist, John Paul II, did so.

https://akacatholic.com/bergoglio-reveals-reverend-ms-lesbo-coming-soon/


教会はベルゴグリオのものじゃない！　←わかりやすいフレーズ。f1否定か教皇制否定にもとれちゃうぞ。

2019-09-22 | F1　フランシス一世
“The Church doesn’t belong to Bergoglio but to Christ. Certainly, I’m worried” says the well-known Catholic journalist, Vittorio Messori, fine intellectual, author of a historic, John Paul II interview, at the time when interviewing a pope was not the done thing by newspapers.

“I have seen many people worried, even desperately. As a believer, nonetheless, I keep in mind that  the Church is not a business, a multinational or a state. In a word, it cannot fail. Certainly, there are plenty of reasons for alarm. I’m thinking, for instance, of the upcoming Synod on the Amazon and its related equivocations; I don’t know what they want to attain – probably the married priesthood.   So, I’m worried, but not desperate because the Church does not belong to Bergoglio or the bishops, but to Christ alone and He governs it with wisdom. The forces of evil will not prevail,”


シュナイダー司教　←対話するだけ無駄　←記事にするだけ無駄

2019-03-10 | F1　フランシス一世

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/bishop-schneider-extracts-clarification-on-diversity-of-religions-from-pope-francis-brands-abuse-summit-a-failure?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=bf556bfaee-Daily%2520Headlines%2520-%2520U.S._COPY_225&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-bf556bfaee-404002701&fbclid=IwAR2rIntCeR1rKt1LJsln4_pMcRGipAAmVBvIS4YOQBdYjqEsgVni4lQvyPc

↓

https://akacatholic.com/elusive-bishop-schneider-wins-obfuscation-from-francis/

↓

https://novusordowatch.org/2019/03/francis-lies-to-athanasius-schneider/

↓

https://onepeterfive.com/bishop-schneider-obtains-entirely-unhelpful-peronist-response-from-francis-on-diversity-of-religions/

↓

https://voxcantor.blogspot.com/2019/03/oh-so-now-we-are-to-believe-that.html


1774　教会博士聖アルフォンソ・リゴリオ　245年前、教会が堕落しているので神のために働かず神が助けない教皇が出る可能性に言及　←今そうなってまあーす

2019-02-18 | F1　フランシス一世

1774年＝245年前

教会はたるみと混乱、ほとんどの司教は霊魂への熱意なし、ほとんどの修道会はたるんでる、従順は過去のもの、教区はもっと悪い

現時点で全聖職者と教会の改善がなされなければ、信者の道徳の大崩壊が起きる

不幸にして神の栄光でなく自らの目的を求める教皇がでるかもしれず、主は教皇を全く助けない

https://unamsanctamcatholicam.blogspot.com/2019/02/st-alphonsus-letter-on-state-of-church.html

The following letter of St. Alphonsus Ligouri has been making the rounds on Catholic Twitter this weekend. What is especially remarkable is the degree of candor we see from saintly Ligouri on the real possibility of a pope "that does not have the glory of God for his sole purpose" and warnings that, if such a man were elected, "things from their present condition would go from bad to worse." Today, such language from a theologian would get him accused of fomenting a "coup against the pope" or being branded "the great accuser." At any rate it demonstrates that even centuries ago in a supposed age of burgeoning ultramontanism, it was not remiss for a theologian—and a sainted one at that—to speak candidly about the scandalous state of affairs in the Church and to consider the realistic possibility of a worldly pope whose priorities are not the salvaton of souls but his own "human respect." Let us look at the pertinent section of this remarkable letter:

24 October 1774
You Excellency my dear friend and Lord,
As regards my opinions concerning the present state of the Church with relation to the election of the new Pope, what opinion of any weight could a miserable, ignorant, and unspiritual person like myself possibly give? There is need for prayer and much prayer. All the human science and prudence that there is cannot extricate the Church from the present state of relaxation and confusion in which every section finds itself; the all-powerful arm of God is necessary. As regards the bishops, very few of them possess genuine zeal for souls. Almost all religious communities—and one could omit the "almost"—are relaxed. As a result of the present state of general confusion, observance has collapsed and obedience is a thing of the past. The state of the secular clergy is still worse; so, in a word, there is a need for a general reform of all clerics and ecclesiastics if there is to be any improvement in the present great corruption of morals among the laity.
So we have to pray to Jesus Christ that He would give us as head of the Church one possessed of more spirit and zeal for the glory of God than of learning and human prudence. He should be free of all party attachments and devoid of human respect. If, by chance, for our great misfortune, we should get a Pope that does not have the glory of God as his sole purpose, the Lord will not help him greatly and things from their present condition will go from bad to worse. However, prayer, which can provide a remedy for so many present ills, will move the Lord to put His hand to the problem and remedy the situation. 
St. Alphonsus Ligouri to Don Traiano Trabisonda (Letter #791)
 

今までは「神さえいなきゃ丸く収まる＝無神論」と神を排除していたが、これからは「神のお望み多様性」と神を後ろ盾にした新宗教に格上げした

2019-02-06 | F1　フランシス一世

https://voxcantor.blogspot.com/2019/02/it-is-full-apostasy.html

The pluralism and the diversity of religions, color, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings. This divine wisdom is the source from which the right to freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives.

These two sentences include at least three heretical teachings:

  1. that pluralism is willed by God, whereas in fact it is diversity that is the consequence of the sin introduced by man into creation, as Sacred Scripture, including Genesis, the account of the Tower of Babel, and the Epistles of St. Paul make clear
  2. that God is the source of error and erroneous beliefs
  3. the Heresy of Oecumenism, introduced by Josef Ratzinger and the Vatican II Anti-council, that "all religions are equally true" and that "we all worship the same gods".

http://www.traditio.com/comment/com1902.htm#190208

https://tradcatknight.blogspot.com/2019/02/new-special-guest-podcast-is-up_42.html


f1背教新次元「宗教多元性多様性は神の御旨」←すべての宗教や性的志向が仲良く共生するにはこの自由と多様性の理論しかない。キリスト教はムリ

2019-02-06 | F1　フランシス一世
The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings.
 

Freedom is a right of every person: each individual enjoys the freedom of belief, thought, expression and action. The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings. This divine wisdom is the source from which the right to freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives.

(Antipope Francis and Grand Imam Ahmad Al-Tayyib, A Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together, Vatican.va, Jan. 4, 2019; underlining added.)

This is blasphemy! This is apostasy!

This takes Modernist “papal” apostasy to a whole new level. Until today, none of the Novus Ordo “popes” ever dared to utter this heresy and blasphemy directly. The closest the Vatican II Sect ever came was during the time of “St.” John Paul II, when his Lenten preacher delivered a sermon during the Vatican’s Good Friday liturgy in 2002. Fr. Raniero Cantalamessa, OFM Cap., blasphemously claimed that false religions “are not merely tolerated by God … but positively willed by Him as an expression of the inexhaustible richness of His grace and His will for everyone to be saved” (Sermon of March 29, 2002; English taken from here).

Cantalamessa was never disciplined for this clear endorsement of apostasy, nor was there any outrage. And why should there be, considering that this is essentially what they all believe in Novus Ordo Land anyway, the proof of which we saw today in Abu Dhabi. It will come as no surprise, therefore, that Fr. Cantalamessa still holds the position of preacher of the “papal” household to this very day.

This apostate statement Francis signed today represents the latest stage of development of Novus Ordo teaching, which has its origin in “St.” John XXIII’s 1963 encyclical Pacem in Terris (n. 14) and Vatican II’s 1965 declaration Dignitatis Humanae (n. 2). Although freedom of religion was proclaimed there, this freedom was declared to be rooted in man’s dignity (which is false, too), whereas Francis has now announced its origin as being the Divine Wisdom Itself — and this will be taken as “doctrinal development”. It is a frightful blasphemy of staggering audacity!

Francis’ assertion that religious diversity is willed by God is a landmark development, the importance and consequences of which cannot be overestimated. Of course there will be some of the usual suspects trying to spin this manifest heresy into a statement still within the bounds of orthodoxy — we are thinking of people like Robert Fastiggi and Jimmy Akin — but everyone else will get the message.

https://novusordowatch.org/2019/02/apostasy-francis-diversity-of-religions/


未来永劫罪に定められてしもうた人たちもぎょうさんおるんとよ！

2018-04-06 | F1　フランシス一世
あるフォーラムの中で、ある人が指摘していたことですが、教皇フランシスコの「愛のよろこび」の項目番号２９７に、非常に深刻なフレーズがあります。
 
「未来永劫、罪に定められる人はいません。それは福音の論理ではないからです。」
（日本での、「愛のよろこび」カトリック中央協議会　２５３ページ）
　英語では次のようになるようです。
 「No one can be condemned for ever, because that is not the logic of the Gospel!」
 
　これは、「地獄はない」と教皇が言っただろうことを間接的に支持する論理的内容となります。未来永劫罪に定められる人とは地獄との関係でどのようになるのか、この教皇の場合はさらに別の複雑な言い方があるのかもしれません。しかし、普通に読めば、いままで地獄行きとみられている状態にある人のことを指すと読めるものです。
 
　しかし、前回書きましたが、教皇の主張は聖書でイエズスが述べた福音ではありません。