Trump is trying to prevent America from going bankrupt due to the trade deficit with

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

June 15, 2025 (Sunday edition)
Trump tariffs are "resurrected." The federal appeals court "stayed" the "injunction." Spokesperson: "The judge tried to strip the president of his power." The "deep state" is still lurking in the United States.

Trump tariffs are back. On the 29th, the U.S. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals (high court) "ruled to reinstate" President Trump's "wide-ranging tariffs" for the "period of review." Go Trump!

In April 2025, 12 states, including New York and Arizona, filed a lawsuit against President Trump and others at the U.S. Court of International Trade. This is what a Democratic-strong electoral district did.

They filed a lawsuit at the International Trade Court, claiming that the high tariff policy introduced by the Trump administration is illegal, and sought an injunction against the tariff policy based on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). However.

Do they "hate" the "strong America" enough to file a lawsuit at the International Trade Court? If America does not block imports with "tariffs", the trade deficit will only grow.

Trump is trying to prevent America from going bankrupt due to the trade deficit with the Trump tariffs. Do they really think that the trade deficit is a "good thing" enough to file a lawsuit in the International Trade Court?

The Trump administration is asking that tariffs not be added to sales prices. However, they are "concerned" that the Trump tariffs will raise the "price of imported goods".

I believe that we should create a tariff system where exporters to the United States can have "zero tariffs" if they make an effort. We should encourage the export of American products.

That is "balanced countervailing duties". Balanced countervailing duties are a Trump tariff system that is levied on the difference between the amount of exports to the United States and the amount of imports from the United States.

In other words, if an exporter exports $1 trillion to the United States and imports $1 trillion from the United States, the actual tariff will be zero, even if the Trump tariff is 50%.

Also, if an exporter exports $1 trillion to the United States and imports $80 million from the United States, a tariff will be imposed on the taxable $20 million.

President Trump's goal is to eliminate the trade deficit. Instead of restricting imports with tariffs, the United States needs to make an effort to export more than it imports.

President Trump has instructed Walmart not to "top up" tariffs. This is difficult, but if Walmart exports to exporters the same amount as it imports, the tariff will be zero.

If the "cooperatives and trading companies" in China and other countries that export to "Walmart" balance their "export and import amounts" with the United States, then "zero tariffs" is zero.

For example, if a Chinese exporter exports "clothing and miscellaneous goods" to Walmart and imports the same amount of "beef and pork" from Walmart, this will result in "trade balance."

"Walmart" should not only import from Chinese exporters, but also export from "Walmart" to Chinese exporters. Chinese "exporters" import and sell in China.

President Trump should say that "expanding world trade" requires efforts to "balance" each country's "import and export amounts." He should demonstrate this with "balanced countervailing duties."

American importers should "demand" that exporters to the U.S. import the same amount of U.S. products as the U.S. imports.

President Trump says that "iPhones" should be manufactured in the U.S., but there are "no" "factory zones" in the U.S. where "low-wage workers" live.

If that is the case, we should create a "special zone on the Mexican border," accept "illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants," and employ them as "low-wage workers." Everyone, please agree!

Part 1 References
Trump tariffs "resurrected": Spokesman: "The judge tried to take away the president's authority"... Federal appeals court blocks injunction
https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20250530-OYT1T50065/

I'll write again tomorrow.
facebook.com/mike.bloomberg.fanpage.2025

Part 2: Immigration Law Violation Cases, Sunday Edition

Chapter 7: When I was released from prison after completing my sentence, I read the newspaper and found out that a similar incident had occurred at the Philippine Embassy.

❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

Philippine diplomats, embassy staff, and Filipino drivers have suffered the same damage as me.

I have also filed a criminal accusation against this case.

I and the Chinese in the 2010 immigration law violation case, and the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomats in 2013, were punished for the same reason.

I have submitted my complaint and the complaints of the Chinese and Filipinos to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, and the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office.

However, all of them were rejected. If the prosecutor accepts and rejects the case, I can request the Prosecutor's Review Board to prosecute, but I have no way to oppose the rejection.

I also appealed to political parties and Diet members. But they were all ignored.

A city council member accompanied me to the Democratic Party's legal advisor. However, the advisor's answer was that if the "principal offense" is found guilty, then the "crime of aiding and abetting" is established. Is he really a lawyer?

The Democratic Party's legal advisor says that all those who graduated from the Legal Training and Research Institute have the same answer. This is proof that Japan is not "governed under the law".

I asked the Japan Bar Association for support. They said that the JFBA does not have the "power" to solve the problem. Japan's "judicial system" is crazy.

I have "emailed" "political parties and Diet members", as well as "the Prime Minister's Office and the Human Rights Bureau" on "Facebook and (X)", but they are still ignoring me.

This case is an arbitrary misapplication of the law by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. (It is an illegal act).

The charges are "Abuse of the authority of a special public official" and "Crimes of False Complaints".

In my "personal opinion," the prosecutors "concealed" the "criminal complaint" and "criminal accusation" by their "authority." Therefore, the "statute of limitations" has been suspended.

"Chapter 8." This case is "legally" an "error in the application of law."
"Errors in the application of law" are not subject to "requests for retrial" under the "Criminal Procedure Law."

However, if the "crime of the inspectors and police officers involved in the case" is "proven," a request for retrial can be made.

1. The charge against the "special public officials" in this case is "abuse of the authority of special public officials."
They "arrested" us even though there was "no suspicion of a crime." And they even "detained" us. (There is a precedent for grand jury decisions.)
2. And it is "the crime of false accusation." It is a fact that they "indicted" us and even found us guilty in a "trial" in order to make us criminals.

Requests for retrial can be made by us or by the prosecutors.
I believe that the prosecution should admit guilt and make a request for a retrial.

I will not give up. It has been 15 years since the incident.

The only country that can resolve this case is the United States.
When Trump was the former president, he promised me.

He replied with a signed letter saying, "I will resolve this in a way that satisfies you."

I hope that this time he will keep his promise.

President Trump, let's work together to "revive the Rust Belt" and create a "special zone on the Mexican border."

And let's cross the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean in two hours with the "American Linear Canal Railway," a freight train dedicated to containers that will replenish the Panama Canal.

People around the world, please support us.

Part 3. Construction of a special zone. It's a new business model.
No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Part 4. "US-Russia-China" three-nation military alliance and war show
No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/
No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

Part 5. Ukraine War
No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/
No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

Part 6. Japan's infamous judicial system and human rights violations
No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/
No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

Part 7. Development of virus detectors for coronavirus and other viruses
https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

Part 8. North Korea's abduction and missile issues
https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

Part 9. One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicle Promotion
https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

Part 10. Nagano Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant: CO2 Free & SDGs
https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp