A question I am often asked about my "proposal" for the "special zone" is, "Why would

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

Weekday Edition April 30, 2025
A question I am often asked about my "proposal" for the "special zone" is, "Why would hiring illegal immigrants increase employment in existing factories?"

Factories in the "special zone" will hire illegal immigrants as low-wage workers, in-troduce the latest "factory equipment," and invite production engineers from over-seas, including China.

This will allow them to manufacture "products" at a lower cost than in China. Prod-ucts manufactured in the "special zone" will surpass Chinese products in both quali-ty and price, and sales will increase dramatically.

In principle, the "raw materials and parts" for products manufactured in factories in the "special zone" will be sourced from factories "outside the special zone." This is stipulated in the "Special Zone Supply Chain Law."

If sales increase through shipments from existing factories to the "special zone," it is natural that employment will increase and wages will rise.

This week I am writing about the "special zone on the Mexican border" as an exam-ple, but the same is true for the "special zones" in Algeria and the Philippines.

In the "special zone" in Algeria operated by "European countries including Italy", sales (exports) of materials and parts from "countries" including Italy will increase, and employment of "Italian workers, etc." will increase.

The main role of the "special zone" is the assembly of labor-intensive products such as smartphones. And in industrial sectors that workers in their home countries do not like, such as shipbuilding.

Therefore, employing illegal immigrants as temporary residents or low-wage work-ers will lead to increased employment of workers in their home countries.

The manufacturing (assembly) base for iPhones is China, but Japanese-made parts are also used. The proportion of Chinese-made parts in the 2020 iPhone 12 was 4.7%.

It seems that Apple will move iPhone manufacturing to India. Chinese factories will stop producing iPhones and turn into subcontractors for EV manufacturer "BYD".

President Trump wants Apple to produce iPhones in the United States, but at pre-sent there is no factory land in the United States where low-wage workers can live.

The United States is also losing to China in the production of AI robots. Even if US manufacturers want to move their factories from China or Canada to the US main-land, they cannot do so because there are no low-wage workers.

If they are forced to move their factories from overseas to the US, not only will the rising wage costs increase the price of their products, but rising wages will also lead to inflation.

Therefore, the only way to solve this problem is to use Trump's wall to create a "special zone" on the Mexican border.

I call this a "special zone" because this factory site will be "prescribed" by a "spe-cial law." The White House staff should understand this quickly.

Part 1 References
Smartphone exclusion is "temporary," Trump tariffs are changing, new tariffs "with-in 2 months"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gvkmhj5PEb4

I'll write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp