To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
2025-04-07: Weekday edition,
There can be no ceasefire as long as both sides have "offensive weapons". Presi-dent Trump probably thinks Zelensky is a "troublemaker".
A few hours after "reaching an agreement with President Trump" on a limited ceasefire in Ukraine, Russia and Ukraine "accused each other" of "airstrikes causing fires and damaging infrastructure". "Do what you want!"
The White House announced that "in a phone call" President Trump told them that U.S. ownership of Ukraine's nuclear power plants is the best way to support the energy infrastructure.
However, President Zelensky denied that "I have never discussed the issue of nu-clear power plant ownership with President Trump". He says Trump is a liar.
President Zelensky later stated that he has no intention of transferring ownership of Ukraine's nuclear power plants to another country. Trump would like to say, "Then let Europe protect the nuclear power plants!", but leaving it to Europe will lead to "World War III".
On March 24, the US will hold separate "consultations" with "Russia and Ukraine" in Saudi Arabia, but I think the next "consultations" will be "much more difficult." (This article is scheduled to be published on April 7)
I think Ukraine wants a "ceasefire." Putin also wants a ceasefire, but Putin has the upper hand now. So I think Putin will demand the "lifting of economic sanctions" in exchange for a ceasefire.
If the Trump administration stops all "military support for Ukraine," "Ukraine's un-conditional surrender" will be certain. I think Russia will make the "lifting of eco-nomic sanctions" a "condition for a ceasefire."
It seems that "about half of the people in Europe and the US" want "war with Rus-sia." However, "right-wing/conservatives" are "against war" with Russia. Opinions are divided even in Europe.
The worst thing is that Europe has a historical "anti-Russian culture," so I think an-ti-Russians will "come together" to support Ukraine and oppose the "lifting of eco-nomic sanctions." Supporting Ukraine means a war between "Europe" and "Russia".
No matter who thinks the outcome of the war will be, "Russia" will win. However, "Europe" will go to war with Russia. The "crazy people" who have been brain-washed by Biden can no longer be stopped.
The "EU" is holding an "EU summit". However, the "dispatch" of troops to the "peacekeeping forces" cannot be "resolved" due to Hungary's opposition. Support for Ukraine cannot be "resolved" either.
In the end, I think the EU will split up. The Pope has been discharged from the hos-pital. He will have to recuperate for a while, but I hope he gets better soon.
When the Ukraine war began, the Pope "lamented". The "Pope" said that this war was "someone" who "forced" Russia to invade Ukraine. President Trump knows "someone" and "who".
I think President Trump will "strongly decide" to "end the war". That is the lifting of economic sanctions against Russia. President Trump. Good luck!
Part 1 Citations and References
Russia and Ukraine accuse each other of infrastructure attacks after US-Russia summit
https://jp.reuters.com/world/ukraine/EVIOKKKX5FOH5LZUZ7C7HKET4A-2025-03-18/
[Details] Russia invades Ukraine (movements on March 21)
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20250321/k10014733441000.html
I'll write again tomorrow
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp