To everyone in the world's media
I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.
April 23, 2025: Weekday Edition
This is a continuation of yesterday's "Stupider than a bag of bricks". Who is stupid-er? This will determine the fate of MAGA. President Trump will expel Musk. Musk does not understand President Trump's true intentions.
President Trump is aiming to revive "manufacturing". However, this is not "manu-facturing that procures parts and assembles them". It is "manufacturing that manu-factures all parts in the United States and "assembles" them at low cost.
I "anticipated" President Trump's ideas and proposed "restoring the Rust Belt" and "special zones on the Mexican border". I have written about this many times. Be-fore that, let's go back to the topic of "cars".
"Hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicles" are the same as "gasoline internal combustion engine vehicles". Instead of compressing and exploding gasoline, inter-nal combustion engines obtain propulsion by compressing and exploding hydrogen, so they are composed of many parts.
Because there are few "general-purpose parts" for "hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicles," new entrants to the automobile industry must "develop parts from scratch" and mass-produce them in order to beat "first-time entrant manufactur-ers."
It will take much longer for Chinese companies to acquire the "know-how" of "in-ternal combustion engine vehicles." However, I think this is because a person stu-pider than a bag of bricks "preached" the "conspiracy theory" that "EVs" are "CO2-free."
I think Biden was a "conspiracy theorist" who promoted "EVs." "Western automak-ers" are being swayed by "Chinese-made EVs" and are facing a "survival crisis."
If Americans talk about "patriotism," I would like to say that people who buy "EVs" are "patriots stupider than a bag of bricks." President Trump should provide subsi-dies for the completion of hydrogen internal combustion engine vehicles.
President Trump should "remake" American manufacturing with the "make every-thing from scratch" spirit of the analog era. "Made in America" should "say" "prod-ucts assembled in America" using American parts.
That's why I say that the "Special Zone" is a factory where products are assembled. The parts and materials for the products are supplied from the United States, which is "outside the Special Zone", through the supply chain.
Many of the factory workers in the "Special Zone" are "low-wage workers" who are cheaper than those in Mexico. Therefore, "American products" can be produced more cheaply than in China.
My argument is that the "logic" is that "products superior to Chinese products" pro-duced in the "Special Zone" will be "sold", and "employment will increase" in areas outside the Special Zone.
I would like to say that people who cannot understand this logic are "stupider than a bag of bricks". The "Special Zone" is not only a low-wage factory, but also the most advanced factory in the world.
The main role of the factory equipment here is "AI robots (manufacturing equip-ment)". These "AI robots" are produced in the "Rust Belt" and supplied to the "Spe-cial Zone". More tomorrow.
Part 1 References
Musk openly criticizes tariff advisers as "really stupid"
https://mainichi.jp/articles/20250409/k00/00m/030/052000c
I'll write again tomorrow.
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
