There are hundreds of thousands of victims around the world, including Filipinos and

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

August 5, 2025
The Chinese government has sentenced a Japanese man to prison for "violating the Anti-Espionage Act". I believe this is "retaliation" for the "illegal arrest" of "many Chinese" for violating the Immigration Control Act in 2010.

The world should understand the "background" behind the Chinese govern-ment's arrest of a Japanese man for "violating the Anti-Espionage Act". The cause of this incident lies with the Japanese government. The number of "Chi-nese victims" exceeds tens of thousands.

The Japanese government is calling on the Chinese government to release the detained Japanese, including this man, as soon as possible. Before that, the Japanese government should apologize to "me and the many Chinese victims" who are victims of violations of the Immigration Control Act, and restore their honor.

The Japanese government is violating the Constitution and the Immigration Control Act and arbitrarily making Chinese people into criminals. The victims are not only Chinese. The world should know the facts.

There are "hundreds of thousands" of victims in the world, including "Filipinos and Koreans". President Trump should speak out against Japan's "human rights violations".

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigra-tion Control Act" by "activities outside the status of residence". After their arrest, in June 2010, I and the Chinese recruiter (KingGungaku) were also arrested.

The reason for this is that the "issuance of documents" to the Chinese was ille-gally "fabricated" as "aiding and abetting violation of Article 70 of the Immigra-tion Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution "fabricated" the fact that "I and KingGungaku" "concluded" a "false employment contract" with the Chinese. It is "completely unreasonable" for the prosecution to say that this constitutes "the crime of aiding and abet-ting" of "illegal employment" under the Criminal Code.

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act". If a person obtains a "status of residence" by submit-ting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke that "status of resi-dence" at his "discretion." (Provision of innocence)

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act. The "reason for the crime" in the in-dictment cannot be a crime. My argument is...

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice can re-voke the act of a foreigner who obtained a status of residence by submitting false documents through "administrative measures" (cancellation of status of residence). "Administrative measures" are not laws, so they are not guilty.

"2": Even if a Chinese person engages in "illegal employment activities," he is not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for "aiding and abetting illegal employment." Therefore, in light of the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese person is not guilty.

There are many Japanese people on the Internet who say that "the world is China risk," but their claims are "off the mark." How pitiful they are.

Part 1 References
[Anti-espionage law violation] Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs: "Judicial au-thorities will deal strictly with the matter in accordance with the law" Astellas Pharma employee sentenced to prison
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb4IWiUcKzg

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano