ライフ、健康

元気で幸せで暮らすため いい生活習慣を身に付けまましょう

Permanent Solution for Emergency Restoration

2017-02-23 14:21:57 | 日記
Imagine standing in a swamp with knee-deep mud, rain pouring down and mosquitoes swarming on a hot muggy day in July. You are watching a 500-kV tower — destroyed by a tornado the night before — being hauled away so a temporary structure can be placed into the line and power can be restored. Now imagine it is three months later, the swamp still has knee-deep mud, mosquitoes are still swarming, and it is a bright and sunny humid day. The temporary structure installed in the 500-kV line is being dissembled and replaced with a permanent structure.
In an effort to avoid this scenario, Dominion’s transmission lines group has adopted a strategy of restoration called permanent emergency. For all emergencies, whether minor or major, the restoration practice from 69-kV to 500-kV lines is to use materials, towers and poles in inventory to replace or restore the damaged parts of the line with permanent replacements. Simply put, the motto for emergencies is to “do it once and walk away.”
The Dominion transmission system consists of 6500 miles (10,461 km) of 69-kV, 115-kV, 138-kV, 230-kV and 500-kV lines covering most of Virginia and eastern North Carolina, U.S. Dominion placed the first 500-kV line into service in 1966 and then expanded the system from that line to cover most of its service territory. Because of their age and the demand for more power, most of the original lines have been rebuilt or are in the process of being rebuilt. As of June 2016, more than 5000 500-kV towers make up Dominion’s 500-kV system and 85% of these towers are tangent towers. In terms of operations, there are five major families of towers: 5, 5V, 5-2, F and 93 series.
Structural Background
Developing a functional strategy requires looking at both the design and historical events on the system. Prior to 1999, Dominion did not experience many structural failures on the 500-kV system. These failures were addressed with two temporary, in-house-designed, multidimensional aluminum H-frame structures. These structures were used once or twice in the early 1970s and then set aside. Spare structures consisted of extra towers and parts ordered for a project. They were not inventoried and were dumped on a back lot.
In 1999, an articulated mowing machine knocked a guyed V-tower off its foundation, resulting in a slight buckling of the two legs. The structural engineering group designed a temporary direct-buried guyed H-frame structure composed of an old steel tubular tower. This was later replaced by a lattice self-supporting tower identified from surplus.
In 2001, another guyed tower — located on a mountainside in West Virginia — failed as a result of a broken guy grip, most likely during a wind event. This was ironic because guy grips on towers in the adjacent valley, locally known as Hurricane Alley, had been inspected the previous month to determine whether a guy grip replacement program was needed. Early the next morning, engineers took a helicopter to the remote site, arriving before any construction personnel. The tower had fallen in the transverse direction into the tree line. It was readily apparent the foundation and anchors were intact. If — and that was a big if — a replacement tower was available, the new tower could be erected on the same site.
The only available option was the temporary H-frame previously described. After blasting holes in the rock to direct bury the legs, setting the longitudinal guys and erecting the structure, the line was energized five days later. A permanent self-supporting tower was ordered and installed months later, requiring another seven-day outage. The total cost of the restoration was US$1.1 million, and the restoration required two outages and 12 days.
A meeting was held for management, construction and transmission operations to discuss lessons learned and what could be improved. It was noted the two recent incidents involved the same tower type with no damage to the foundations and anchors. Considering the number and age of this tower type, as well as the time it took to install the temporary structure, Dominion decided to order two spare guyed V-towers.


Blister Packaging Testing Methods

2017-02-23 14:12:11 | 日記
Introduction
Blister packaging or press through packaging (PTP) is a widely used packaging technique in the pharmaceuticals industry, especially for the mechanized packaging of solid medicines. It represents 30% of the worldwide market for pharmaceutical packaging. The following are the key benefits of blister packaging:
Allows medicine to be stored in stable and reliable condition
Facilitates minor amount and serial packaging
Provides convenient, portable, hygienic, and safe packaging
More versatile and allows for long-term storage
Features functions such as counter forgery and identification
Testing Specifications for Blister Packaging
Blister packaging is mainly used for solid drugs, preventing the drugs from exposure to microorganism, foreign matter, moisture, and air and avoiding the leakage, release, or evaporation of the APIs present in the drugs.

Material testing is essential due to the possibility of the direct contact of the drugs with blister packaging materials such as PVC/PVDC laminated sheets, PVC sheets, and PTP aluminum foil. The testing parameters include barrier property, appearance, hygiene indexes, and mechanical properties such as impact resistance strength, tensile strength, thermal tensile ratio and much more. This article discusses the testing of key characteristics of blister packages.
Barrier Property Testing
Barrier property testing includes testing of oxygen transmission rate and water vapor transmission rate. The testing procedure for oxygen transmission rate in aluminum foil packaging is not described in the standards. However, if the number of pinholes meets the specifications outlined in the standards, it can be taken as a measure of the oxygen transmission rate requirement for a specific packaging. High precision instruments must be used for testing due to the high barrier properties of PVC and aluminum.
It is not possible to test the entire blister package on the current whole package testing fixtures, due to the small sizes of the package. The values obtained from the film barrier property testing significantly differ from the actual water vapor transmission rate and oxygen transmission rate of the packaging materials due to force of the aluminum foil, thermal tensile ratios of the materials, and the uniformity of the adhesives.
For that reason, a specially designed fixture is used for blister sample preparation to test the whole blister’s barrier property (Figure 1). Testing of rates of water vapor transmission and oxygen transmission is performed using sensor method and equal pressure method, respectively. The flow velocity is carefully adjusted during the testing to prevent the impact on the sample status caused by the change in the gas quantity and the subsequent change in the pressure inside the blister.

How to select an air handling unit

2017-02-23 09:22:38 | 日記
Air handling units come in all shapes and sizes. Learn to balance and prioritize all of the choices related to performance, efficiency, maintainability, and space constraints.
Learning Objectives
1. Know the different types of ahu coils, and their basic anatomy
2. Understand the codes and standards that govern AHU specification
3. Learn about how energy can be saved in HVAC systems that use AHUs.
A basic definition of an air handling unit (AHU) might be “a box with a fan, coils, and filters.” From there it gets considerably more complicated. Proper selection of an air handler requires answering myriad questions ranging from “what capabilities are required?” to “will it fit?” Only after establishing these basic project constraints can the art of evaluating and selecting an AHU begin.
Before starting this process, it’s important to realize that there will not be a “perfect” selection for any AHU as many competing criteria, not the least being cost, will force compromises. It is the engineer’s job to balance and prioritize all of the decisions related to performance, efficiency, maintainability, and space constraints to select a unit that has the lowest lifecycle cost for a given application.
This article provides general information and guidance on the selection of various ahu heat exchanger components, starting with a brief description of the major categories of AHUs. While much of the discussion in the remainder of the article relates primarily to large AHUs, the general considerations can be applied to any size.

THE BENEFITS OF HARVESTING HVAC CONDENSATION

2017-02-23 09:11:39 | 日記
It is a typical, muggy August afternoon in Houston, but Erik Knezevich, P.E., is feeling super-chilled. The former Rice University facilities project manager is standing inside the massive air conditioning unit that cools Brockman Hall for Physics on the north end of campus. The incoming air registers a toasty 88 degrees, but in the instant it takes for it to blow through water-chilled air conditioner (A/C) coils and reach him, it is decreased more than 30 degrees — cold enough to travel inside the building’s ductwork and keep labs, classrooms and offices comfortable.
Anyone who knows Houston understands that high temperatures are just part of the reason air conditioners run feverishly nearly year-round. Couple an average August thermometer reading of 94 degrees with an average relative humidity of 75 percent, and it is easy to see why “air you can wear” is not just a meteorologist’s fanciful turn of phrase for residents of the Bayou City. Under those combined conditions, sweat drenches people, and condensation nearly pours off A/C coils. On a hot, humid day, the amount of condensate produced from the Brockman Hall A/C system equals an astonishing 15 gallons per minute.
In many Houston buildings, HVAC condensate is discarded, simply sent down the sewer. However, at Rice University, a long history of environmental stewardship makes that kind of waste unacceptable.
Instead, the condensate from Brockman Hall and six other buildings is captured and pumped back for reuse on campus, primarily as makeup water for the central plant’s cooling towers. Knezevich figures that Rice recovers about 14 million gallons of water per year, and that is probably a conservative estimate. That means that instead of buying 14 million gallons of treated, potable water from the city to replenish its cooling towers or tapping the university’s own well, Rice saves a precious resource and a considerable amount of money.
According to Knezevich, HVAC condensate recovery has been underway at Rice for about eight years. Some of the buildings were retrofitted to make the process possible; for newer buildings, including Brockman Hall and the BioScience Research Collaborative Building, condensate recovery was incorporated into the design. Knezevich admits that retrofitting is not always economically viable. Of 12 campus buildings considered for HVAC condensate recovery, it only made sense for seven.
“If you have a pipe going from the attic to the basement in an existing building, you’re going to rip up too much of the structure to justify the return on investment,” he says.
In addition, the reused condensate does not totally replace the water required by the cooling towers. Some fresh water will still be needed. According to a report by the San Antonio, Texas, cooling water system, the figure typically ranges from as little as 5 percent to as much as 45 percent with the latter figure reflecting a high-ventilation building such as a laboratory.1 At Rice, the total cooling tower makeup water for the university is about 68 million gallons per year, so the recycled amount represents about 20 percent.
Knezevich, who now operates Galaxy Consulting Engineers, expects that as construction continues on campus, condensate harvesting will be part of the plan. Water recovery, he explains, is part of Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) certification — which is administered by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), the benchmark in green building — and Rice is aiming for the LEED Silver level.
As he notes in a YouTube video that promotes Rice University’s condensate recovery efforts, using HVAC condensate instead of potable water in cooling towers is, “putting good water to good use.”