The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
● International society not interested in the history of the Far East
Abiru
There is no doubt that the Chinese National Party and America at that time were very closely attached.
Should it be said that it is a well-known fact.
Takayama
Critic Birei Kin says, but all the aides of Chiang Kai-shek are experienced studying in the United States.
In short, Chinese intellectuals of Fulbright (haha).
Their training was also managed by CPI, and the cost was allocated for reparations from China, which was rolled up by the United States by Boxer Rebellion.
It became a big problem a long time ago.
Abiru
In case of Nanjing case, it spread a propaganda effort first, I certainly think that it is the Chinese National Party who received American assistance, but it became a big problem a long time ago.
After all, it is after Honda Katsuichi's ‘Travel in China’ (Asahi Shimbun, 1972).
Takayama
Even in the Tokyo trial, it calls Maggie or other expressly to testify.
Abiru
But at that time, it did not become that hot topic.
Takayama
Yeah.
It is also true that GHQ, which also manages the Tokyo Trial, has written the Nanjing Incident made by the US Committee on Public Information as if there was anything using the Asahi Newspaper.
Abiru
The issue of prime minister's visit to Yasukuni Shrine is also disseminated to the world by Asahi Shimbun, no, it was to let on.
By the way, Korean government complains about Yasukuni.
This is strange.
If China says, for argument's sake, let's assume that you should not really say it, you probably have circumstances, so I will forgive you if you say, it will also be said that, while, why does South Korea say, about it.
It is because there is no war with Japan.
About a story I heard from an acquaintance diplomat, the ministerial level people complained about the first time at the time of Roh Moo-hyun administration about Yasukuni problem that it only told underling until then.
When he asks the other diplomatic authorities ‘Why does Korea say this problem’, the answer is ‘No, as China is saying a lot, we think that we must say something’ (Lol).
It is not reasonable.
As a characteristic of that ethnic group, once they mention it starts to work up.
Takayama
The same is true for Rising Sun Flag.
That's why you are pretext for a quarrel on the flag of the Japanese Navy that has never fought.
Abiru
In international society, they do not know anything about the history of the Far East.
This is also the story I heard from the diplomat, but the next year when the second Abe administration started, he went to the east coast and exchanged opinions with various people such as US senior officials.
Then, the senior US official said that it did not know that Japan never fought with Korea.
Even if we call a senior government official, it is about that degree.
President Trump also did not know that Japan and Korea are not fighting until Prime Minister Abe taught.
It must teach from here.
In fact, the story is shallow root.
Even if the story is shallow root, like the Moritomo · Kake problem, forcibly set out to make it a big problem.
This draft continues.
