the Asahi controlled Japanese intellectuals, the public, and other media.

The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
I am emphasizing the sentence except for the headline.
The limit of the supporter of the current Constitution
It is nothing other than brainwashing (mind control) by America = GHQ that continues in Japan.
GHQ glossed over American war crimes such as dropping the atomic bombs, forcing the Japanese to embrace the feelings of guilt to the past.
Constitution Article 9 is also the result.
And the Asahi newspaper served as its agent, so to speak, he controlled Japanese intellectuals, the public, and other media.
Most people have not recognized the facts; more than seventy years have passed since the war.
The best evidence that the brainwashing still cannot be solved is a constitution that has never been revised yet.
Even though there are differences in opinion about the contents of the Constitutional amendment, there are no countries that are retroactive to the amendment itself.
Even Germany has been revised 60 times.
In 1993, when the Yomiuri Shimbun made the Constitutional Problem Study Group with the president Tsuneo Watanabe (then) as a flag director, researchers at each department level and in-house think tank gathered, and I was also named at the end.
The following year, when we announced the draft proposal of the Constitution in the paper, we got a significant criticism from a supporter of the current Constitution as expected.
However, unless someone indicates a starting point for the discussion, both Constitution revisionists and supporters of the current Constitution end up merely by unilaterally arguing their views.
While the Yomiuri Shimbun announced the proposal three times to advance constructive discussions, the Asahi Shimbun has reached today without a draft proposal.
An article titled ‘Constitutionalism Constitution revisionist theory’ quiet indications’ was published in the Asahi Shimbun morning paper on June 4 this year.
There was a ‘Constitution revisionist theory’ with the criticism of the Abe government by the representative Yukio Edano of the Constitutional Democratic Party. Still, there is not any convincing reality there.
It seems to be an alibi making that ‘supporter of the current Constitution is not necessarily not considering Constitution.’
To them, there is a consciousness that the Constitution should not be changed one word in a word, but this is the limit of a supporter of the current Constitution.
This draft continues.