President Trump is working hard to avoid "World War III." French President

To everyone in the world's media　

I will provide the missing materials so please request by email.

2025-04-09: Weekday edition,
President Trump is working hard to avoid "World War III". French President Macron says that his unpopularity has been reversed by the "conflict with the United States" over Ukraine. The French people should make an effort to avoid "World War III".

France "broke the Minsk Agreement" and helped Ukraine prepare for war. In the presidential election, Zelensky appealed to "take back territory through war". Have the French forgotten "news"?

Zelensky attacked "Russian residential areas" in the east with "weapons". The resi-dents are "Russian-Ukrainians". He is a despicable man who killed his "own people" with weapons!

Western countries criticized China for the "Tiananmen Square incident". However, "Chinese soldiers in tanks" stopped their tanks and "did not run over" the "civilians" standing in front of them. The French people should "praise" the Chinese military.

President Zelensky killed a Russian Ukrainian with a weapon. France supports Zelensky. The French people should normalize their awareness of human rights.

Biden and Zelensky "provoked" Russia until it invaded Ukraine. We think "Russia held out well." Putin knew what the international community would say if Russian troops invaded Ukraine.

The Minsk Agreement was a promise not to send "soldiers or weapons" to Ukraine from abroad. The Minsk Agreement is an international treaty that reports to the United Nations.

On September 20, the year before the war began, Biden conducted a large-scale military exercise in Ukraine by a multinational force of 15 countries, including Ukraine. This is the "threat" that Putin hates the most.

On October 23, Biden deployed 180 anti-tank missile systems (Shabelin) in Ukraine. This is a "weapon." It was openly deployed to intimidate Russia.

On December 7, Biden forcibly proposed a meeting with Putin, and after the meet-ing, he expressed a negative view that he was "not considering" sending US troops to Ukraine to prevent Russian invasion.

And before the war, Russian troops gathered on the "border" of "Belarus" and set up "positions," and Russia threatened Ukraine.

"In response," Biden made a big fuss about Russia's invasion of Ukraine and started a "countdown" in front of the TV every day.

It was as if Biden was "luring" the Russian army to invade Ukraine. "Come on, ba-by." Putin was furious at "Biden's luring" and ordered the Russian army to invade Ukraine.

As former Chancellor Merkel said, Kiev's defense was fully "battle-ready." Russia underestimated Ukraine's defense. When the Minsk Agreement began, Ukraine re-ceived military equipment from various countries and was ready for war.

Russia trusted the Minsk Agreement too much. Putin was deceived. This war is Putin's war of "grudges." I think only President Trump can stop it.

Part 1 Citations and References
French President Macron's popularity soars, leadership praised over Ukraine, un-popularity reverses, "conflict with the US" pointed out
https://www.sankei.com/article/20250322-N2TVWRKHJNIKPGSERKHARMXZO4/

I'll write again tomorrow

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/