The following is the continuation of the previous chapter.
This chapter was submitted entitled Compared to the correctness of Kubota Councilor, on earth, which country's newspaper is the Asahi Shimbun?
Japan said that the independence of South Korea before the entry into force of the Peace Treaty was a violation of international law.
Japan said that it is a violation of international law that the Japanese were barely returned from Korea after the end of the war.
Japan said that the United States and South Korea are in violation of international law concerning claims.
Japan said that the slavery status of the Cairo Declaration was written in an excited state.
Kubota Councilor, Korean independence is unusual in terms of Japan but is not a question of international law violation,
I did not say that Japanese repatriation is not a violation of international law,
The military government of the United States does not necessarily commit an international law violation,
The effect of the Cairo Declaration was written in an excited state during the war.
Korea's governance seemed to have had a bad side, but also said that there was a good side.
Kim representative repeated only the same thing as ‘the remarks of the Japanese delegate are destructive’.
In a meeting on October 21, 1953, the Korean side said that if Japan withdrew Kubota's remarks and admitted that it was bad, it would be impossible to continue the talks.
Kubota Councilor, Korea says that Japan is non-constructive, Korea forced the Syngman Rhee line declaration just before the 1952 Japan-South Korea talks, seized the Japanese fishing boat, deteriorated the atmosphere, this is an international Law violation, saying that it is in principle to file a lawsuit against the International Court of Justice, it is natural to publish a view at an international conference, it is not appropriate to promote to foreign countries as if Japan had violated, I did not withdraw and said that he did not think the remark was wrong.
Although the Korean side cannot attend the meeting in the future, Korean side said that this is totally responsible for Japan, the meeting ended, South Korea set the Syngman Rhee line as retaliation for ‘Kubota reckless remark’, and occupied Takeshima.
Kubota Councilor in the House of Councilors on October 27, the Korean side is under the illusion that it is 'the victorious country' to Japan, and, ‘Since a new international law of independence of the oppressed ethnic group was made, it is all subordinate to it ‘, Because it is, although there is recognition that Korea is a darling in the international community, both have answered ‘There is no grounds.’
In addition, Kubota Kanichiro Councilor of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Korea on the secret public document ‘Japan-ROK talks Measures to resolve after the crackdown’ dated October 26, 1953,
‘There is no solution unless Korea gets down from the get conceited clouds’
After analyzing that the Korean people's temperament is ‘It yields to the strong person and with the weak person, it is tyrannical.’
Leaving the recommendation that the Syngman Rhee administration should start overthrowing,
The Asahi Shimbun who reported the existence of this official document on June 15, 2013 caused it to cause the Japan-ROK negotiations to break down on Kubota's remarks.
Kubota's remarks were withdrawn at a meeting between December 31, 1957 Foreign Minister Fujiyama Aiichiro and Ambassador Kim Yuteku.
This draft continues.
