The paper by Ms. Yoshiko Sakurai posted on the front page of the Sankei Newspaper is a paper that all Japanese citizens who can read the type should read.
Ms. Sakurai Yoshiko is not only a person who is true for the national honor prize but also a person who is not an exaggeration to say that it is a treasure of Japan.
All the Japanese citizens who read this paper are supposed to have a true patriot here, it is a woman, and should think that it is our seniors and will bow your head.
I am emphasizing the sentence except the headline and * ~ * is me.
The policy about the nuclear power generation in now, it is two peas in a pod of the policy of Naoto Kan administration in the Democratic Party administration times.
Depending on the region, in abnormal heat exceeding 41 ° C, the government decided at the Cabinet on July 5th the Fifth Energy Basic Plan (Fifth Plan) with a view to 2030 and 2050.
The Japan-U.S. Nuclear power agreement with 30 years' maturity has also been automatically extended.
Under such circumstances, the Atomic Energy Commission of the country announced that it will ‘reduce the holding amount of plutonium’ with new guidelines, and chairman Yoshiaki Oka showed concern about plutonium which currently holds more than 47 tons.
It is an incomprehensible matter to the public, but it is a very important thing in the sense that Japan can continue to provide a stable supply of electricity, which is the root of rich and secure living.
Looking at the energy policy, surprising is highlighted.
The policies of the Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito regime overlap with the policies of the former Democratic party's Naoto Kan government.
The Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito administration took over the basic course of the Kan administration completely today.
Rather than the national interests and the well-being of national life, the policy of the Kan government energy policy under the anti-nuclear ideology itself and the Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito regime are two peas in a pod has already failed.
The fifth plan itself of this time that should have considered the future of our country is impossible to realize.
To meet the two requirements of economically self-reliance without national aid and preferential treatment and becoming a trump card for decarbonization, renewable energy by sunlight and wind power will be converted from 22 to 24 %, And the 5th plan says it will be the main power supply.
Today, electricity derived from sunlight is 4.4% of the total and wind power is 0.6%.
Renewable energy is important as a main power source for the future, and I think that one should emphasize R & D (research and development) as one of the pillars of the national strategy.
However, it is extremely difficult from the viewpoint of meteorology and economics to set power supply that fluctuates like sunlight and wind power as the main power source in the near future.
Can you open the prospect in about 10 more years?
Expert opinion is negative.
* On the contrary, if we continued with such foolishness for another ten years, we may have lost the land itself of the Japanese archipelago due to abnormal weather. *
Renewable energy should be positioned as a further goal.
On the other hand, there is nuclear power in the power supply that can be supplied immediately.
However, the fifth plan does not face the front.
What percentage of nuclear power plants do you want to keep just by describing that it will be restarted after improving safety while reducing nuclear dependence as much as possible?
The target of 20 to 22% that was shown at the draft stage was deleted.
Considering this together with the above-mentioned plutonium reduction policy, Japan will have to go increasingly to depend on fossil fuels such as coal to compensate for unstable renewable energy.
China declared to construct a miniature module furnace (SMR) of 200,000 kW nuclear power generation at 143 places to drastically reduce the regional heat supply by coal, in addition to the 200 most advanced nuclear power plants in the world.
With China and the world struggling to build a country based on a higher level of nuclear energy, will only Japan drop off completely?
This draft continues.
